“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This paper will examine the “Apostles-Only View” and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will continue to provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. In Part One, we examined theologians’ perspectives on the initial recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit, ranging from the early church to the Reformation Era. In Part Two, we explored theological viewpoints on this topic up until the eighteenth century. Part Three focused on the nineteenth century, highlighting the beginnings of the Apostles-Only Position. In Part Four, we addressed the twentieth century, which saw numerous divisions regarding this issue. Finally, in Part Five, we turn our attention to the twenty-first century, where the controversy continues to persist, including on social media. Let’s proceed to Part Five.
Exploring the Historical Background (Part Four)
~ The Debate Continues ~
This section continues the ongoing discussion about who the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit were on the Day of Pentecost. Although John Chrysostom raised the question of who received the Holy Spirit in the fourth century, to my knowledge, there is no evidence that any theologian taught that only the Twelve Apostles received the Holy Spirit when the Spirit descended until the nineteenth century. Most of the nineteenth-century scholars we investigated concluded that 120 or more disciples received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. In the nineteenth century, a new perspective emerged that ignited the ongoing modern controversy: the Apostles-Only position. Now, in the twenty-first century, the differences between these positions have become more pronounced.
Twenty-first Century (2000 – ?)
As we look ahead, we will begin by exploring the perspectives of Charismatic Theologian Craig Keener.
Craig S. Keener (1960 – )
Craig S. Keener is an American New Testament scholar whose work has had a significant impact on the study of the Gospels, Luke-Acts, and biblical background; his emphasis on “spirit hermeneutics” has also made him one of the leading voices within the Pentecostal/charismatic tradition. Dr. Keener was educated at Central Bible College (B.A.), Assemblies of God Theological Seminary (M.Div.), and Duke University (Ph.D., 1991), and has served as professor at Hood Theological Seminary, Palmer Theological Seminary of Eastern University, and since 2011 as the F.M. & Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary. In addition to numerous scholarly articles, Dr. Keener has written several major books, including The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament, A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew, The Gospel of John, the four-volume Acts: An Exegetical Commentary, Miracles, Spirit Hermeneutics, and Christobiography.1 In his commentary, he writes
“The promise applies to all believers (2:39) … The ‘all’ of 2:1 must include the Twelve (1:13, 26; cf. 2:14), the women, and Jesus’s bothers (1:14), and presumably some others as well.”2
I agree with Craig Keener on this matter.
Let’s take a moment to consider a quote from the Baptist scholar L. Scott Kellum.
L. Scott Kellum (1964 – )
L. Scott Kellum (b. Jan 31, 1964) is a well-known U.S. Baptist scholar and educator whose research focuses primarily on the study of Greek exegesis, Johannine studies, the development of the NT canon, and Biblical hermeneutics. Mr. Kellum was born in Gulfport, MS. Mr. Kellum received his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Miss., Master of Divinity degree from New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, and his Doctorate of Philosophy in NT Studies from Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary in 2002. He began teaching at Southeastern in 2003. Dr. Kellum serves as Senior Professor of NT/Greek. In addition to his work in academia, Mr. Kellum has also been involved in local church ministries. Specifically, he has pastored churches in both Mississippi and North Carolina. Some notable writings by Dr. Kellum are “The Unity of the Farewell Discourse,” “Preaching the Farewell Discourse,” and “Acts” for the Exegetical Guide to the Greek NT Series. Also, Dr. Kellum is listed as an author of “The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown” and collaborated with Charles L. Quarles on “40 Questions About the Text and Canon of the NT.” All of these endeavors have positioned Dr. Kellum among many other prominent evangelical Baptist scholars who currently seek to integrate their scholarly pursuits with their church-based expository instruction.3 He simply states that
“The antecedent of αὐτοῖς [them in Acts 2:3] is the 120.”4
This quote indicates that L. Scott Kellum recognizes that the initial infilling of the Holy Spirit included 120 people, not just 12.
Next, let’s read what Keven L. Moore, a Restorationist theologian, has to say.
Kevin L. Moore (c. 1967 – )
Kevin L. Moore is a writer/teacher/missionary for the Churches of Christ with a focus on missions, Bible studies, and instructional education for churches. Kevin writes that he was born in West TN, moved to New Zealand in 1987, and served as an Evangelist for Churches of Christ in Wellington (1987-1994) & Whanganui (1996-2003), then in Porirua (2010-2012). He now serves as Professor of Bible & Missions and Director of Studies of Missions at Freed-Hardeman University. According to the Public Faculty/Catalog of Freed-Hardeman University, Kevin earned the following degrees: BS from Freed-Hardeman College (1983); Two-Year Certificate in Preaching from the East Tenn. School of Preaching (1986); Additional Study at ACU (1987); MA from FHU (1996); PhD from VU (2005). Additionally, Kevin is the author of books including “Getting to Know the Bible” and “The Single Missionary”, while continuing to write articles on Bible and Theology issues for publications like Journal of Language, Culture & Religion and Forthright. Thus, he remains a well-known figure among writers in Bible education and among missionaries in the Churches of Christ.5 On his blog site, he writes
Between Christ’s ascension and the Day of Pentecost the apostles did assemble with 120 disciples (Acts 1:15), yet several days elapsed from the apostles’ return to Jerusalem to the outpouring of the Spirit (1:5). Seeing that Pentecost was fifty days after the Passover (Lev. 23:15-16), and from Christ’s resurrection to his ascension was forty days (Matt. 28:1; Acts 1:3), over a week stood between the Lord’s ascension and Pentecost. Since the temple was the regular assembling place for larger groups (Acts 2:46; 5:42), it is interesting to note that their prayer meetings were in the temple (Luke 24:53), not in the upper room where the apostles were residing. When Luke records that “they” were in one place (Acts 2:1), the nearest antecedent is the “apostles” (1:26). In order to assert that the Holy Spirit was poured out on 120 men and women, one has to skip back over eleven verses and ignore the immediate context. Furthermore, the apostles are the only ones recorded in Acts 2 as speaking from God, and the masculine pronoun houtoi (“these”) in verses 7 and 15 (literally “these men”) clearly has reference to them. Finally, the baptism of the Holy Spirit was never promised to all disciples but specifically “to the apostles whom he had chosen” (Acts 1:2-5; cf. 2:43; 5:12).6
He largely echoes what other apostles and advocates have said. I look forward to addressing his points soon.
Let us examine Kyle Butt’s views, an American apologist for the Churches of Christ, on this matter.
Kyle Butt (1976 – )
Kyle Butt is an American apologist for the Churches of Christ who teaches and writes about Christian Evidences, Biblical Authority, and Popular Apologetics. Kyle Butt’s work is identified by Apologetics Press as Associate Director of the organization since 2000. The website states that he holds a B.A. in Bible & Communications, M.A. in New Testament Studies, M.Div. in Apologetics, and a D.Min. All of the above are earned at Freed-Hardeman University. Also stated on the website is that he is the Author/Co-Author of over forty books and has participated in numerous debates against Atheist Interlocutors. These three primary sources collectively demonstrate that Kyle Butt is a church-based apologist, a prolific publisher/writer of popular-level content, who has had impact through publications, debating, video teaching, and a nearly two-decade association with Apologetics Press; NOT through a traditional university faculty position.7
“Some assume that the events in Acts 2:1-4 must go all the way back to Acts 1:15. If we remove the chapter division, however, this problem is easily resolved. Acts 1:26 and 2:1, without the division, read as follows: ‘And they cast their lots, and the lot fell on Matthias. And he was numbered with the eleven apostles. Now when the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.’ When these verses are combined, as they are in the original text, it is easy to see that the ones who were ‘with one accord in one place” were the apostles. The pronoun ‘they’ in Acts 2:1 does not refer to the 120 disciples but to the immediate antecedent—the apostles.”8
Bradley S. Cobb (1978 – )
Bradley S. Cobb is an author and a Churches of Christ Minister who publishes, edits, and writes books focused primarily on expositional preaching/teaching and on practical church/individual studies. On “The Cobb Six” website (www.thecobb6.com), he is identified as the author of “The Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts.” Additionally, the same source distinguishes Jesse Cobb as his spouse, which supports attributing the book to Bradley rather than to Jesse. Published by Cobb Publishing in 2015, this book presents a passage-by-passage examination of all references to the Holy Spirit found throughout the book of Acts. This publication fits into a larger collection of commentaries, sermons, and other study tools published by Cobb via his ministry platform. Since most biographical information about Cobb can be found on his personal website (rather than independently verified by universities or scholarly institutions), he may be considered a contemporary ministerial author/publisher rather than simply someone with an established academic background.9 In an article he wrote for Apologetics Press, he states,
Some argue that this event [being filled with the Spirit and speaking in tongues] happened to the entire 120 who were mentioned in 1:15… We… state that verse one shows this is a different day, and then says “they were all with one accord in one place.” The last group of people mentioned [in Acts 1:26](and therefore the most likely antecedent of “they”) is the apostles, just four verses earlier in 1:26. We will also point out that in verse 14, Luke says Peter stood up “with the eleven,” not “with the one hundred and nineteen.”10
He merely reflects the views of those who hold the apostles-only position that we have read previously.
I have decided to include Corey Minor, as he is gaining influence on topics like this.
Corey Minor (1972 – )
Corey Minor is a modern-day Christian media professor/online theologian; he is best known as the head of Smart Christians, an internet-based ministry that aims to develop students of Scripture (Christian and non-Christian alike) using Smart study techniques for all levels of Bible students. The Smart Christians webpage presents the organization’s goal as providing a means for Christians and non-Christians to gain a deeper understanding of Scripture through Smart Christian study methods. His podcast appearances also establish him as the “voice” of the “Smart Christians Channel,” particularly when discussing some of the most controversial doctrines today (such as the Gifts of the Holy Spirit). Lastly, a recent Faithlife product description establishes him as associated with discerning study of the Word of God, stating that the Smart Christians Study Bundle was developed out of Corey Minor’s desire to live as a “Smart Christian.” Overall, it can be said that while Minor may not be considered a traditional, academically trained scholar, he is a contemporary digital-age Bible professor who uses digital media, open public theological discussions, and curated studies to impact others.11 In one video, Corey states,
He does not appear to offer any new insights into the apostles-only position. However, it is noteworthy that he is one of the few evangelicals who maintain this belief. We have also identified another prominent evangelical who shares the same view – Norman Geisler. From an evangelical perspective, both Corey Minor and Norman Geisler represent a minority view. While this does not necessarily mean they are incorrect, it is simply a matter of fact. I find their position does not align with sound hermeneutics or exegetical principles, as the scriptural record indicates otherwise.
Mike Glover, a Restorationist English Bible teacher, agrees with Corey Minor.
Mike Glover (1979 – )
Mike Glover is an English Bible Teacher & Author; he works for “The Scriptures UK” – creating (in addition to) a vast array of topical studies, Book Commentaries, Sermon Materials & Small Group Lessons. On the site’s “Books of the Bible” webpage, Glover describes himself as a graduate of the British Bible School and states he has worked for many years among different churches, both by way of being their preacher/teacher and by leading adult and child education programs in which God’s Word was taught. Additionally, Glover mentions that most of his studies have been developed using input from other teachers, specifically Frank Worgan and tutors at the British Bible School. With a wealth of knowledge available through his writings, including topics like the Holy Spirit, Baptism, Church Questions, and many others related to the Old and New Testaments, it would be fair to describe Mike Glover primarily as a Bible Study Writer & Teacher who serves local churches.13 In an article, he wrote,
“We find these promises, which were made only to the apostles, recorded in… [He then quotes John 14:26; John 16:13; Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4-5] … It’s a mistake of major proportions, both textually and contextually, to assign these promises to ALL disciples. When we read carefully, we will see that only the apostles were addressed.”14
He is simply repeating teachings that only other apostles promote. I will address these arguments in future sections of this article.
Justin Childress is another evangelical who adheres to the apostles-only position.
Justin Childress (c. 1989 – )
Justin Childress is a contemporary Christian author, Bible teacher, and online theological instructor best known as the founder of “The Spirit Searches,” a website that provides information on biblical interpretation, doctrine, and practical instruction for lay readers. Based on his publicly displayed bio, he claims to have believed in Jesus Christ since 2005; he was raised in Pentecostal Churches, currently attends a non-denominational church named Christian Chapel, and occasionally leads Sunday School classes there. He defines his beliefs concerning doctrine as partial preterism, cessationism, credo-baptism (partly Reformed), and postmillennialism. Additionally, the majority of his writings and teaching resources address speaking in tongues, eschatology, salvation, and biblical exegesis. Although there are no records of him holding an official position in academia or of holding an advanced degree in theology, he has established a discernible online ministry through blogging and Bible teaching to defend what he considers the purity of biblical doctrine and to challenge practices/traditions he believes contradict scripture.15 Justin writes that
“The apostles alone were to be Jesus’ witnesses. In Acts 1:8 Jesus says to them, ‘You will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.’… “The promise of the Holy Spirit was made exclusively to the apostles on multiple occasions.” [He then quotes John 14:16-17, 26; 15:26; 16:7, 13; Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4-5, 8].”16
While there are passages where Jesus promises the Holy Spirit to the Apostles, there are also passages that indicate this promise extends to other disciples. Proof-texting is not an effective approach to solid, persuasive exegesis. I will delve into this issue in more detail later in this article.
After Justin Childress states in his article that the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit was promised exclusively to the apostles, he continues with the discussion.
“Of course, the Spirit was not to be given to them [the apostles] alone. John the Baptist said that the Spirit would be given in a more general sense when he said to the crowds attending his baptism that Jesus would baptize them with the Holy Spirit and fire (Matt 3:11). This wouldn’t occur, however, until the Spirit was dispensed upon the apostles who, through the laying on of their hands, imparted it unto other believers”17
Without providing a full explanation just yet, I want to point out that I see Justin trying to resolve the contradictions in his own interpretation. The key fact is this: the Holy Spirit was initially given to many disciples on the Day of Pentecost, not just to the Twelve.
In his video, he adds
“‘They’ of Acts chapter 1 more often refers to the apostles than it does to the hundred and twenty, and so if our understanding of who they were is based on who it refers to more often in the previous chapter, it would have to be the apostles in Acts 1 the apostles are referenced 28 times in contrast to the 120 who were only referenced eight times.”18
Upon thoughtful reflection, I find the quote to lack clarity and depth. It’s important to distinguish between meaningful interpretation and mere word counting. Let’s strive for genuine exegesis!
His video quote continues…
“We don’t have anything directly tying anyone other than the apostles to the day of Pentecost we know that Jesus’s mother and his brothers were part of the 120, and yet we don’t see them in Acts chapter 2. in fact we don’t see anyone But apostles being mentioned in Acts chapter 2.”19
This quote illustrates a person’s incomplete homework, revealing a lack of critical engagement with the material. Though I have not yet presented my case, one should at least recognize that strong contextual evidence shows that both women and men were directly promised to wait for the promised Gift of the Holy Spirit, which was to be poured out on Pentecost. Luke’s use of “they” extends beyond the twelve disciples, as indicated in Luke 24:33-36. I encourage all those reading this article to carefully read Luke 24:33 to the end. Though it is not hard to identify all those who have been promised the Spirit within the text, in the exegesis section, I will go through this in detail.
Historical View Summary
This article provides a historical overview of the teachings of Christian authors, teachers, and theologians regarding who initially received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost. I acknowledge that I have not covered every possible writer on this topic, but I believe I have included a comprehensive overview for those interested in theological discussions. Three main views have emerged on this matter: 1. Only the Twelve Apostles initially received the Holy Spirit. 2. 120 disciples initially received the Holy Spirit. 3. More than 120 disciples initially received the Holy Spirit. For those who love visuals, I have created the picture to the left to illustrate the perspectives.
Since this article is intended as a critique of the Apostles-only position, I will focus on that perspective for the remainder of the discussion. In the upcoming section, I will present a comprehensive, in-depth examination of the arguments supporting the apostles-only position. This will include a thorough analysis of the various perspectives and rationale put forth by its proponents, as well as a careful consideration of the implications and consequences of this viewpoint. Let’s get started.
“Keener, Craig S. 1960–,” Encyclopedia.com, accessed April 6, 2026; Asbury Theological Seminary, “Dr. Craig S. Keener,” accessed April 6, 2026; Asbury Seminary, “Dr. Craig Keener: Miracles Today,” accessed April 6, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “Craig S. Keener,” accessed April 6, 2026; Eerdmans, “Craig S. Keener,” accessed April 6, 2026; Craig Keener, “About Craig Keener,” Bible Background, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
Craig S. Keener, Acts: An Exegetical Commentary, vol. 1, 4 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Publishing Group, 2012), 795. ↩︎
L. Scott Kellum, “Curriculum Vitae,” Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, accessed April 7, 2026; “L. Scott Kellum,” Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary faculty profile, accessed April 7, 2026; L. Scott Kellum, The Unity of the Farewell Discourse: The Literary Integrity of John 13:31–16:33 (London: T&T Clark, 2004); L. Scott Kellum, Preaching the Farewell Discourse: An Expository Walk-Through of John 13:31–17:26 (Nashville: B&H, 2014); L. Scott Kellum, Acts, Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament (Nashville: B&H, 2020); Andreas J. Köstenberger, L. Scott Kellum, and Charles L. Quarles, The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown: An Introduction to the New Testament, 2nd ed. (Nashville: B&H, 2016); Charles L. Quarles and L. Scott Kellum, 40 Questions About the Text and Canon of the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2023). ↩︎
L. Scott Kellum, Acts, ed. Andreas J. Köstenberger and Robert W. Yarbrough, Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2020), 30. ↩︎
Kevin L. Moore, “More about Kevin L. Moore,” Moore Perspective, accessed April 6, 2026; Freed-Hardeman University Undergraduate Catalog, 2013–2014 (Henderson, TN: Freed-Hardeman University, 2013), faculty listing for Kevin L. Moore; Freed-Hardeman University Academic Catalog, 2015–2016 (Henderson, TN: Freed-Hardeman University, 2015), faculty listing for Kevin L. Moore; World Evangelism Media Store, “Moore, Kevin,” author page, accessed April 6, 2026; 21st Century Christian, “The Single Missionary,” accessed April 6, 2026; Kevin L. Moore, “The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth: Deciphering Meaning through Layers of Context,” Journal of Language, Culture, and Religion 3, no. 2 (2022); Kevin L. Moore, “Earl Edwards evangelizes up to the last day,” Forthright, October 12, 2025 ↩︎
Apologetics Press, “Kyle Butt,” author profile, accessed April 7, 2026; Apologetics Press, “Authors,” accessed April 7, 2026; Eric Lyons, “AP Staff Spotlight: Dr. Kyle Butt, Associate Director of Apologetics Press,” Apologetics Press, June 30, 2025; Kyle Butt, Baptist Book (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2005), Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data; Kyle Butt and Eric Lyons, Behold! The Lamb of God (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2006), Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data; “About the Authors,” The Joy of Generosity, accessed April 7, 2026. ↩︎
Bradley Cobb, “Welcome to TheCobbSix.com!,” The Cobb Six, March 23, 2014; Bradley S. Cobb, The Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts (Charleston, AR: Cobb Publishing, 2015); Bradley Cobb, “The Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts,” The Cobb Six, February 2015; Bradley Cobb, “The Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts,” Cobb Publishing, accessed April 7, 2026; Bradley Cobb, “We Are Moving,” The Cobb Six, March 10, 2017; Bradley Cobb, “We Have Accepted a New Work,” The Cobb Six, May 8, 2017; Bradley Cobb, “The Quarterly,” The Cobb Six, accessed April 7, 2026; Bradley Cobb, “The Bradley S. Cobb Commentary Collection (MySword),” The Cobb Six, accessed April 7, 2026. ↩︎
Bradley S. Cobb, The Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts (McLoud, OK: Cobb Publishing, 2015), 28. ↩︎
Smart Christians, “Home,” Smart Christians, accessed April 7, 2026; Smart Christians, “About,” Smart Christians, accessed April 7, 2026; The Remnant Radio’s Podcast, “Interview with Corey Minor, Smart Christian #theologypodcast #theologydiscussion,” December 19, 2023; Faithlife, “Smart Christians Study Bundle,” accessed April 7, 2026. ↩︎
Mike Glover, “Books of the Bible,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; “Sermon Series,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; “Small Group Studies,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; Glover, “Books of the Bible”; British Bible School, “Teaching staff,” accessed April 7, 2026; Glover, “Books of the Bible.”; Mike Glover, “The Holy Spirit,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; Mike Glover, “Baptism,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; Mike Glover, “Church,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; Mike Glover, “Old Testament Studies,” The Scriptures UK, accessed April 7, 2026; British Bible School, “Teaching staff.” ↩︎
Justin Childress, 12 or 120? Who Spoke in Tongues on the Day of Pentecost? (Teaching Presentation), 2023, accessed September 21, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=desX_Li2HKY&t=208s., video times 2:31-3:13, video recording April 28, 2023. . ↩︎
“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the “Apostles-Only View” and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will continue to provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. In Part One, we investigated theologians’ perspectives on the first recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit, spanning from the inception of the church through the Reformation Era. In Part Two, our exploration continued as we considered insights from the eighteenth century to the nineteenth century. As we move into Part Three, which covers the nineteenth century, we discover the origins of the Apostles-Only Position. Now, in Part Four, we will examine twentieth-century viewpoints about who first received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost. Let’s eagerly move on to this next chapter!
Exploring the Historical Background (Part Four)
~ The Debate Continues ~
This section continues the ongoing discussion about who the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit were on the Day of Pentecost. Although John Chrysostom raised the question of who received the Holy Spirit in the fourth century, to my knowledge, there is no evidence that any theologian taught that only the Twelve Apostles received the Holy Spirit when the Spirit descended until the nineteenth century. Most of the nineteenth-century scholars we investigated concluded that 120 or more disciples received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. However, a new perspective emerged in the nineteenth century that sparked the ongoing modern controversy: the Apostles-Only position.
Twentieth Century (1900-1999)
As we explore the twentieth century, the diverse theological perspectives on our original topic come into focus. Let’s eagerly embark on this journey, beginning with E. M. Zerr!
E. M. Zerr (1877-1960)
E. M. Zerr — also known as Edward Michael Zerr — was born in Strasburg, Illinois. As a child, he lived in Missouri. At 17, he was baptized. During the late 1800s, he became involved in some local church work. For many years, Zerr conducted “Bible Readings” for churches of Christ throughout this country; he wrote articles for Christian journals and spent over 7 years writing his bible commentary. His most lasting contributions have been through his verse-by-verse study of the entire Bible, along with several hymns and smaller doctrinal studies. His influence has endured even after his passing on February 22, 1960.1 In his commentary on Acts 1:5, Zerr posits that…
“When John predicted the baptism of the Holy Spirit (Mat 3:11), he also included that of fire. But he was talking to a mixed multitude, in which were some whom John knew would live and die in sin and finally be cast into the lake of fire. And there also were some in his audience who were destined to become apostles, and hence would receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit. John’s speech was addressed to the multitude as a whole. But when Jesus uttered the promise of this verse, he was talking to his apostles only, so it was unnecessary to say anything about the baptism of fire…”2
There is much to be said in response to Zerr’s quote, but I will save that for later in the article. However, I do want to highlight that, exegetically speaking, E. M. Zerr is speculating beyond the text. If you and I were examining Matthew 3 alone, it would be unlikely that we would conclude from verse 11 that John was secretly distinguishing between future apostles and those who would be condemned. Why is that? Because nothing in the passage explicitly states, “Some of you will receive fire” or “Some of you will receive the Holy Spirit.” This interpretation is not based on a careful analysis of the text; instead, it appears to be his reconstruction imposed on it.
In Acts 2:1, he mentions that…
“They is a pronoun that stands for the ‘apostles,’ the last word of the preceding chapter.”3
Is it true that all pronouns automatically refer back to the last noun mentioned? Zerr suggests that Luke must be following the common Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement rule, which states that a pronoun should refer directly back to the last noun or noun phrase, known as its antecedent. Is this an absolute rule in English or Greek grammar? Do Luke and the other authors of the New Testament prove this to be true? These questions will be explored in detail later in this article. More importantly, even if this rule is being practiced, does it provide sufficient evidence to support the apostles-only paradigm? From my perspective, the evidence still does not support it.
Our next theologian, Thomas Walker, disagrees with Zerr’s interpretation of these passages and supports a more traditional understanding of the texts relevant to this issue.
Thomas Walker (1881-1950)
The 20th-century Christian Biblical Writer/Commentator Thomas Walker (1881-1950) demonstrated a continuing interest in NT Interpretation, particularly in Acts and the Gospels, through his published writings. In theological bibliography, he is listed as the author of “The Acts of the Apostles” in the “Indian Church Commentaries Series,” Madras, 1910; and “Is Not This the Son of Joseph?”, A Study of the Infancy Narratives, London, 1937. The two works indicate that Walker was writing for both an ecclesiastical and educational audience by combining Exegetical Exposition with Historical/Jewish Background. Thomas Walker was a 20th-century Biblical Commentator who produced written commentaries/expositions concerning the NT, and is best known for these contributions.4 In his commentary on Acts 1:15, he writes:
“This verse shews very clearly that the Pentecostal baptism was by no means confined to the apostles. A considerable number of others, both men and women, shared it with them.”5
Additionally, he highlights the same point in Acts 2:1. The term “all” refers to…
“All the disciples assembled in Jerusalem (1:15), men and women, and not the apostles only. Notice the frequent reiteration of the word in this chapter (vv. 4, 7, 12, 14, 17, 21, 32, 36, 39, 43, 44, 45).”6
He holds a broader perspective beyond the apostles-only view, but doesn’t specify whether the total includes the 120 or more who initially received the Holy Spirit.
James Coffman, a Restorationist, offers further insights into the belief that only the apostles originally received the Gift of the Holy Spirit.
James Burton Coffman (1905–2006)
James Burton Coffman was a pastor/teacher/commentator in the Churches of Christ who had a long preaching career and an enormous commentary project, which earned him recognition as one of the most prominent Restoration Movement Bible Expositors of the twentieth century. In 1927, Coffman earned his Bachelor’s degree in History and Music from Abilene Christian University. Before becoming a full-time preacher in 1930, Coffman worked in education. Over more than 60 years of ministry, he preached regularly in congregations across Texas, Oklahoma, Washington, D.C., and New York City. He also led hundreds of Gospel Meetings. He is best remembered for leading churches in both Houston and Manhattan. Following retirement in 1971, he dedicated the remainder of his life to completing his commentary series on the complete Bible, which consisted of 37 volumes. The commentaries were completed by 1992 and are now published through ACU Press, but have been available for many years via online academic platforms. Today, these remain popular resources among conservative Churches of Christ Bible Study.7 Coffman presented a compelling argument that only the twelve apostles initially received the Holy Spirit.
“They were all together … Who were the ‘they’? Scholars disagree radically about this, but the conviction here is that the reference is to the Twelve. They were the only ones to whom Jesus had promised such an outpouring of the Spirit. Furthermore, Peter’s words (Acts 2:32) that ‘we are all witnesses’ of Christ’s resurrection can refer only to the Twelve because only two disciples were found among the whole one hundred and twenty who were eligible to join them as ‘witnesses.’ What the word ‘all’ surely means in Acts 2:32 must, therefore, be the meaning here. ‘We … all,’ as used by Peter, identifies the ‘they … all,’ as used here by Luke. Also, ‘numbered with the eleven apostles,’ as it stands at the end of Acts 1, requires ‘eleven apostles’ to be understood as the antecedent of ‘they’ in Acts 2:1…Another consideration is that the apostles had undergone a long preparation for the events of Pentecost, and there is no indication that the entire one hundred and twenty were thus prepared. The implications against understanding ‘they’ in this verse as inclusive of the one hundred and twenty are too formidable to be set aside.”8
While Coffman’s arguments are compelling, they lack important information, giving the impression that the argument is settled when, in reality, it relies on selective evidence. It leans heavily on one antecedent argument, overstates the exclusivity of the promise, treats Acts 2:32 as a controlling key when it may not be, confuses apostolic-office criteria with resurrection witness more broadly, and does not do full justice to Luke’s emphasis on the larger praying community or to Peter’s Joel citation about sons, daughters, and both male and female servants. I will explain this in great detail later.
Interestingly, Jacques Dupont, a Catholic exegete and Benedictine monk, supports a position similar to that of Coffman, Zerr, and McGarvey.
Jacques Dupont (1915–1998)
The work of Belgian Benedictine monk Jacques Dupont, Roman Catholic exegete and New Testament scholar, made him one of the most important twentieth-century interpreters of both the Synoptic tradition and the book of Acts/Luke. A monk at Saint-André de Clerlande in Belgium, he obtained his doctorate in theology from Louvain University in 1946. His major scholarly contribution was becoming one of the leading specialists in the Acts of the Apostles. In addition, Dupont participated in the preparation of the Bible de Jérusalem and authored numerous studies on the Beatitudes, the speeches in Acts, and the theological significance of the Gentile mission. Dupont’s contribution to biblical scholarship will be remembered for demonstrating how a deep concern for theological interpretation can be combined with a strong commitment to close, careful textual and literary analysis. One of the first notable modern discussions of the salvation of the Gentiles in Acts/Luke that provided this model was Dupont’s study “Le Salut des Gentils et la signification théologique du livre des Actes.”9 In this document, he mentions that…
“Luke has announced the Pentecost event ahead of time and reiterated the promise that is to be fulfilled when Pentecost comes (Luke 24:49; Acs 1:4-5, 8). But this promise is addressed only to the apostles.”10
Here, he clearly states that the promise of the Spirit was addressed solely to the apostles. Can this withstand exegetical scrutiny? No, it cannot.
Going forward, the Restorationist minister, Donald F. DeWelt, expresses a viewpoint that is similar to Dupont’s.
Donald F. DeWelt (1919-1991)
Donald F. DeWelt was an influential American Restoration Movement pastor, teacher, publisher, and Bible commentator who had an impact on mid-20th-century independent Christian Church and Church of Christ denominations. From 1957 until 1985, he taught at Ozark Bible College. He began publishing College Press in 1959 and developed a national reputation with the Bible Study Textbook series and other works, including Acts Made Actual and The Power of the Holy Spirit. Later accounts by those familiar with him describe him as particularly remembered for his role as a Bible teacher, writer/publisher, and leader in Christian higher education through classroom teaching, printing ministries, and academic leadership.11 In his work Acts Made Actual, he explains that
“The fact that the antecedent of any pronoun is found by referring back to the nearest noun (or pronoun) with which it agrees in number, etc., clinches the argument of the baptism of only the apostles in the Holy Spirit.”12
This argument appears to be the most compelling evidence for the apostles-only perspective among its supporters. However, from this author’s viewpoint, it not only overlooks the broader understanding of the pronoun-antecedent grammar rule but also violates several principles of hermeneutics. We will explore this issue in detail in some future segments.
Now, let’s evaluate what Roy E. Gingrich taught on this topic.
Roy E. Gingrich (1920 – 2005)
The work of Roy E. Gingrich was that of a well-known Evangelical Pastor, Professor of Bible at several Bible Colleges, and Author who wrote over 100 “Outline” Commentaries on the Bible. Mr. Gingrich was born in Ozark, Illinois, and received a call into the Christian Ministry in 1941. He served as a Pastor in Mount Vernon, IL, then in Indianapolis, IN, before becoming the long-time Pastor of Faith Bible Church in Memphis, TN. It appears from other sources related to his writings that he earned his degree, magna cum laude, in 1963 from Crichton College and shortly thereafter began teaching there. He would serve as Pastor of Faith Bible Church in Memphis for nearly 40 years, while also serving as a Professor of Bible at Crichton College in Memphis. His most notable contributions were hundreds of books of commentary, including surveys and theological studies such as The New Testament Survey and Introduction to Theology. These works were written directly and concisely, using an outline format for Pastors, Teachers, and serious lay readers. As a result of serving as a Pastor for many years, teaching in a classroom setting, and writing extensively, Gingrich has become a recognized conservative dispensationalist voice in popular Bible Exposition.13 In his work, The Book of Acts, he discusses Acts 2:1 and writes about its significance.
“The disciples (the 120 spoken of in 1:15) were gathered with one accord in one place (probably in the upper room mentioned in 1:13) on the Day of Pentecost.”14
While I agree with the viewpoint that does not support the apostles’ only perspective, I understand Scripture to show that more than 120 initially received the Spirit on Pentecost.
Let’s see what Albert Garner has to say.
Albert Garner (1920-2007)
Albert Garner was a well-known Missionary Baptist minister, theologian, writer, and educator who became a significant figure within the Landmark and Missionary Baptist movements in America from the mid-twentieth century until his death. Born to John and Alice (née Wilson) Garner in Cross County, AR, on Aug. 1, 1920, Garner received his Christian education within the Missionary Baptist Church. Garner’s identity emerged through his work as a pastor, through public theological debate, and through an impressive output of written materials. According to various Arkansas histories, he was among the first graduates of Missionary Baptist Seminary and also founded Florida Baptist Schools. In addition to being identified as a notable participant in public debates, holding to a more conservative Baptist stand. In addition to writing the multivolume Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary, he is most remembered for his role as a teacher, debater, and representative of conservative Baptist denominations.15 In his commentary, Garner explains who was to receive the baptism in the Holy Spirit.
“‘But you all will be baptized in (the) Holy Spirit;’ both with and in the Holy Spirit. This points to the overwhelming, empowering, immersing with and in the Holy Spirit of promise that came on Pentecost, as prophesied and promised, by John the Baptist and by Jesus, Matthew 3:11; Luke 3:16; Luke 24:49; John 14:16-17. The ‘ye’ refers not to the Apostles restrictedly, but to the church as an Institution that was baptized, immersed, endued once for all, for her world-wide and age-long work, beginning at Jerusalem.”16
Albert Garner is the first to articulate the “Institutional” argument. If this argument were the only explanation for the events of the Day of Pentecost, there would be little reason for Luke to recount instances of individuals receiving the Holy Spirit in other passages of the Book of Acts, as that would be redundant. A more refined perspective suggests that while the Holy Spirit descended upon the first gathering of the Church, it does not mean that every person who joins the Church automatically receives the Holy Spirit. Instead, this initial event indicates that the Holy Spirit is now available to all members of the Church. Just as the first disciples had to wait to receive the Gift of the Holy Spirit, so do all others. Therefore, this gift should not be understood as a one-time occurrence for the Church, but rather as a free gift that is accessible to individual believers in every generation since Pentecost.
Our next theologian, John Stott, is well-known in Evangelical circles. Let’s explore his perspective.
John R. W. Stott (1921–2011)
John R. W. Stott was an Anglican pastor, evangelist, theologian, and writer who was one of the most important voices for modern-day global evangelicalism through his writings, sermons, and organizational leadership throughout the last century. John R. W. Stott was born in England, educated at Rugby School and Trinity College, Cambridge; Ridley Hall, Cambridge; and was ordained as a deacon in 1945. He served as the Assistant Curate at All Souls, Langham Place in London from 1945-50, and then as the rector from 1950-75. After serving as rector, Stott continued as the rector emeritus at All Souls, Langham Place until his death. In addition to his local parish ministry, John R. W. Stott emerged as a prominent figure in international evangelicalism by establishing Langham Partnership and by helping draft and organize the 1974 Lausanne Congress. At this congress, he led the drafting committee for the Lausanne Covenant and is frequently referred to as its primary architect. John R. W. Stott wrote over 50 books on Christian theology and practice, such as Basic Christianity and The Cross of Christ. Through his roles as preacher, teacher/expositor, and statesman, John R. W. Stott established himself as one of the leaders of contemporary evangelicalism, a figure who will continue to be heard across both academic institutions and churches.17 John Stott succinctly speaks against the Apostles-Only position here:
“For they must not imagine that the Pentecostal gift was for the apostles alone, or for the 120 disciples who had waited ten days for the Spirit to come, or for any élitist group, or even for that nation or that generation alone. God had placed no such limitations on his offer and gift.”18
I wholeheartedly agree with John Stott’s insightful observation that the Holy Spirit’s gift extends beyond the apostles’ generation. It’s truly inspiring to recognize this ongoing blessing! Yes, indeed, let us celebrate this profound truth together!
Our next theologian is well known within Evangelicalism as well and may be the first evangelical to advocate the apostles-only position – Norman Geisler. Until now, most teachers of the apostles-only paradigm have come from the Restorationist theological stream.
Joe Jackson Hisle (1922–2009)
Joe Jackson Hisle was an evangelist in the Church of Christ, a preacher and author of sermons, and a Bible commentator. His public service focused primarily on congregational preaching and gospel meetings rather than on holding a formal professorship. He grew up in Allen, Oklahoma, attended school in Ada, graduated from high school there, studied for three years at East Central College, was drafted into the U.S. Army Air Corps during WWII, and ran his brother’s equipment company. For over thirty years, he had remained a long-time member of the church where he attended college. Among other things, within restoration movement circles, he is well known for a commentary on the Acts of the Apostles that he authored in 2002 and published by Contending for the Faith Publications, as well as for the sermon collection Let No Man Despise Thy Youth. The publisher refers to him as one of the most sought-after gospel-meeting evangelists in the United States and as having preached the gospel for nearly 50 years. His sermons are still widely available today on archived pages of the church where he studied, as well as on Let the Bible Speak.19 In reference to the “they” mentioned in Acts 2:1, he wrote,
“They were all with one accord: It is important to determine who “they” are because these are the ones who will receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit.” There are at least three different ideas as to who “they” might be. Some would say “they,” who receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, include the apostles, the 120 disciples, plus several thousand Jews who become involved in this event. Others tell us “they” are the apostles plus the 120 disciples who are waiting in the upper room. Neither of these ideas is correct. To determine who “they” are, all one must do is to back up to the last verse of chapter one and read through the first verse of chapter two. And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the Eleven Apostles. And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place (emphasis mine-J H). From this reading it is plain to see that “they” refers to Matthias, the new apostle, and the eleven original apostles. After all, the apostles are the ones to whom the Holy Spirit is promised. It should also be remembered the original manuscript is not divided into chapters and verses; therefore, there would have been no confusion to early readers of Luke’s account (see notes on 1:8.).”20
The issue of whether all pronouns refer back to the last-mentioned noun is a key point for advocates of Apostles-Only belief. Again, is this an absolute rule in English or Greek grammar? Do Luke and the other authors of the New Testament support this claim? These questions will be explored in detail later in this article.
In the notes on Acts 1:8, he states…
“But ye shall: This phrase tells us who is to receive “power.” This verse is often used by charismatic preachers to teach that “power” and the “Holy Ghost” are promised to all believers today. This idea is a misapplication of scripture and contrary to what is taught. “Ye” is a pronoun; for it to have value, it must have a noun for which it stands. All we have to do to determine to whom “ye” refers is to review the preceding verses. We find the noun for which “ye” stands in verse 2. The “ye” who “shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you, ” are the apostles.”21
Hisle presents a pronoun-antecedent argument that initially seems strong. In this article, we will conduct a thorough analysis of this argument to ensure readers are not misled again. For now, let’s proceed with the historical material.
Our next theologian, Jay E. Adams, the originator of nousthetic counseling, addresses the recipients of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.
Jay E. Adams (1929–2020)
Jay E. Adams was an American Reformed theologian, minister, seminary professor, and author, best known as the originator of nouthetic counseling. Nouthetic counseling is a type of Pastoral Care based on the idea that Scripture is sufficient for all things in life, unlike many other forms of counseling, which are grounded in secular psychological theories. E. Adams was born in Baltimore, MD. While teaching homiletics, pastoral theology, and biblical counseling at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, he would go on to help develop the Doctor of Ministry in Homiletics program at Westminster Theological Seminary in California. He co-founded several organizations, including the Christian Counseling & Education Foundation (CCEF), the National Association of Nouthetic Counselors (NANC, now known as the Association of Certified Biblical Counselors or ACBC), and the Institute for Nouthetic Studies. In 1970, he wrote “Competent to Counsel,” which has been widely regarded as the primary source that began the modern biblical counseling movement. Throughout the remainder of his ministry, he wrote over 100 books on counseling, preaching, theology, and living as a Christian.22
“The tongues of fire were the sign of the power with which [the Spirit’s descent was enduing them]. This was the reception of the power mentioned in 1:8. The filling of the Spirit was universal; all 120 received it.”23
I agree with him that the filling of the Spirit was universal. It was not just for the Apostles.
Our next theologian is well known and may be the first evangelical to advocate the apostles-only position: Norman Geisler. Until now, most advocates have come from the Restorationist theological camp.
Norman Geisler (1932-2019)
Norman L. Geisler was a renowned American evangelistic theologian, philosopher, apologist, and educator who was the most productive and influential defender of biblically based classical Christian apologeticism and conservative Protestant advocacy of inerrant scripture from the late twentieth century through the early twenty-first century. Geisler was born on July 21, 1932, in Warren, Michigan. He studied theology and philosophy at Wheaton College and William Tyndale College and earned his PhD from Loyola University Chicago. Throughout his career, Geisler taught at several institutions, including Detroit Bible College, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Trinity College, and Dallas Theological Seminary; he also co-founded both Southern Evangelical Seminary and Veritas Evangelical Seminary. He is perhaps best known for defending Christianity’s fundamental tenets, which include theism, the historic Christian faith, and the complete authority of scripture through publications such as Christian Apologetics, Systematic Theology, and I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist (co-authored with Frank Turek); additionally, he was instrumental in drafting the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. As a teacher, debater, and author of numerous books, Geisler has had a profound impact on evangelical theology, apologetics, and conservative exegesis.24 For our purposes, we refer to what he wrote in appendix one, titled “Only the Apostles Spoke in Tongues at Pentecost,” of his Systematic Theology. He states that…
“At Pentecost, the gift of tongues apparently was given only to the twelve apostles, not to all the disciples. This is supported by the following evidence. First, only apostles were promised before Pentecost: ‘You will be baptized with the Holy Spirit’ (Acts 1: 5). It is clear from the context that ‘you’ refers to ‘the apostles’ (v. 2). Second, the ‘they’ (2: 1) on whom the Holy Spirit fell refers back to the previous verse, namely, the ‘apostles’ (1: 26). Third, likewise, “they” and ‘them’ (2:3) on whom tongues of fire fell refer to the same ‘apostles.’”25
I was quite surprised when I read his article about presenting his case for the apostles-only position. From my perspective, he completely overlooks standard exegetical and hermeneutical principles. His points are easily addressed, and I plan to respond to them in detail—leaving no stone unturned in future exegetical segments of this article.
For the first time in history, a Calvinist has a positive view of the apostles’ only position. Let’s explore what Presbyterian theologian Francis Nigel Lee suggests.
Francis Nigel Lee (1934–2011)
Francis Nigel Lee was a British-born minister, theologian, teacher, and writer who wrote on the subjects of Theology, Philosophy, Church History, Apologetics, and Eschatology. Lee was born in Kendal, Westmorland, in 1934. At a young age, he moved to South Africa and received his education there. Lee became a Protestant Christian in 1957. After completing degrees at the University of Cape Town, the University of Stellenbosch, and the University of the Free State, he worked in South Africa, the USA, and Australia in pastoral, academic, and editing capacities. He was primarily recognized for his involvement in Confessional Reformed Theology, Historicist Eschatology, and Postmillennialism, as well as for publishing and/or writing an enormous number of works, both published and unpublished. Sources for the Archives and Obituaries report that Lee served in the Presbyterian Church in America, taught at multiple educational institutions, and worked in Queensland, where he exerted significant influence on Conservative Reformed circles.26
Although I cannot find a direct quote, the author implies this perspective in his book, Calvinism on the Holy Spirit: John Calvin on the Constant Need to Keep on Being Filled with the Spirit, where he mentions that only the disciples initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.27
Although his position is not discussed in depth, it seems to have opened the door for those who adhere to the apostles-only position, particularly in the Calvinistic camp.
The next theologian to join this discussion is the Scottish theologian I. Howard Marshall.
I. Howard Marshall(1934–2015)
Howard Marshall was a Scottish New Testament Scholar. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential evangelical scholars of the latter half of the 20th Century in the interpretation of the New Testament. Marshall’s education took place at Cambridge University and at the University of Aberdeen. Following this, he worked as a lecturer in New Testament at Aberdeen from 1964 until 1999, when he retired. After retiring, Marshall received two professorial appointments: Emeritus Professor of New Testament Exegesis and Honorary Research Professor. Marshall concentrated his scholarly endeavors primarily around three areas: Luke-Acts, the Pastorals, and New Testament Theology. In addition to these specific areas, Marshall also provided broad academic leadership through involvement as Chair of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical and Theological Research; President of the British New Testament Society; and Chairman of the Fellowship of European Evangelical Theologians. Marshall achieved prominence within academia and the Church through major publications, including The Gospel of Luke, Acts, Luke: Historian and Theologian, and New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel.28 In reference to the “all” in Acts 2:1, he states
“The whole company of 120 people is doubtless meant, and not just the reconstituted twelve apostles.”29
Next, we have another advocate for the apostles-only paradigm: Richard H. Snell.
Richard H. Snell (1934-2014)
Richard H. Snell was an internet writer and Bible teacher for the Church of Christ, with articles on the Lexington Church of Christ website. The articles included “Who Were Baptized In The Holy Spirit On The Day Of Pentecost?” and “The Veil of the Tabernacle and the Great Controversy as Taught by E. G. White and the Seventh Day Adventists.” Those articles show Snell to be a conservative restorationist author writing on topics such as biblical exposition, doctrinal controversy, and close argument from scripture. He is a well-known twentieth-century religious writer in the Church of Christ who wrote apologetic and exegetical essays to defend the faith and explain doctrine, rather than being known for a large public profile in academia or church government.30 While he has written extensively on this topic, other theologians have presented similar arguments previously. So, I will focus on his claim that only the apostles were promised the Holy Spirit here. He posits that
“The promise made by John the baptizer quite likely was directed to the future apostles of Christ who were in his audience.”31
While it is likely that the future apostles were present in the audience of John the Baptizer, this does not imply that they were the only ones to whom John directed his message. Adding to his thoughts, he writes…
“The more specific promise was made by Jesus Himself. Made two separate times, this promise of the baptism in the Holy Spirit was given to only the apostles.“32
Let’s consider an important question: Does Acts one encompass the entire narrative of Scripture for this period? If not, could it be that selective passages are being chosen to support a preconceived idea? As we’ll explore, this viewpoint seems to contrast sharply with the clear teachings of the New Testament.
Carl A. Allen, another Restorationist, conveys the same teachings as Snell.
Carl A. Allen (1935 – 2022)
Carl A. Allen, a Churches of Christ evangelist, writer, and Bible teacher, has developed his public ministry through speaking, debating, and conservative, expositional biblical teaching. He was raised in Ada, Oklahoma; baptized into the church in 1959; completed high school at Ada High School in 1966; received a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Sociology from East Central University in 1970; and was ordained to the office of Evangelist in 1970 by the Church of Christ in Ada. As an Evangelist, Mr. Allen has been involved in gospel meeting work throughout much of his career; he has frequently participated in Preacher Studies and has written articles on various doctrines and exegesis for publications such as Truth Magazine, LaVista Church of Christ, and other outlets of the Restoration Movement. From his writings made available to the general public, he continues to address areas of controversy, such as baptism by the Holy Ghost, the nature of doctrine, preterism, marriage, and related topics, making him a recognized voice among conservative teachers in Churches of Christ.33 Carl Allen contends that
“In Acts 1:2, the word ‘ apostles’ is used, and the ‘them’ in Acts 1:3 refers to the apostles. So, also, is the pronoun ‘you’ found in Acts 1:4. It is said to the apostles, Acts 1:5, ‘for John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit not many days hence.” This promise is made to the apostles.’”34
I have previously addressed the pronoun-antecedent argument in a mild manner. The details will be coming soon. He continues to express his thoughts.
“I have been told… that the 120 in Acts 1:15 received the ‘Baptism of the Holy Spirit!’ All one has to do is look at the context of Acts 1-6, and he can see clearly that the 120 did not receive the ‘Baptism of the Holy Spirit… In Acts 1:2, the word Apostles is used and the ‘them’ in Acts 1:3 refers to the apostles. So, also, is the pronoun ‘you’ found in Acts 1:4. It is said to the apostles, Acts 1:5, ‘for John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit not many days hence.’ This promise is made to the apostles.35
He further contends,
“I cannot but notice that in Acts 2:14 Peter “standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and “spake” forth unto them.” The ones that “spake” were the ones who were filled with “Holy Spirit,” v. 4 and the ones that “spake” were the “eleven,” (Peter would make twelve): So it was the twelve that “spake” in tongues and it was the twelve that “spake” after the Holy Spirit was given; so we conclude that it was the twelve that received the “Baptism of the Holy Spirit.”36
These arguments are quite similar. Readers will later appreciate a more in-depth answer regarding this point. A significant aspect of Carl A. Allen’s exegetical issue is his neglect of the full context, particularly in Luke 24.
Let’s explore Richard B. Gaffin’s insights on the topic, drawing from his perspective as a Reformed scholar.
Richard B. Gaffin Jr (1936 – )
Richard B. Gaffin Jr. is a prominent Reformed theologian who serves as an Orthodox Presbyterian pastor and professor emeritus. His contributions have helped establish him as a leading representative of Westminster biblical theology since the late 20th century and into the 21st century. As a child of Orthodox Presbyterian missionaries in Peiping (now Beijing), China, Gaffin grew up and attended college at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, MI. After that, he received his Master of Divinity (M.Div.) degree from Westminster Theological Seminary. He then went to Germany, where he received his Ph.D. from the University of Göttingen. Gaffin became a member of the faculty at Westminster Theological Seminary in 1965, after which he taught for many years, ultimately taking the Charles Krahe Chair of Biblical and Systematic Theology. He currently holds the title Professor Emeritus of Biblical and Systematic Theology.37 Richard Gavin asserts that,
“It needs to be stressed that Acts 1: 8 is not addressed indiscriminately to all believers, regardless of time and place, but directly only to the apostles (cf. v. 2 where the “you” of v. 8 is explicitly identified as the apostles).”38
As those quoted earlier do, the apostles-only advocates make the pronoun-antecedent argument a key focus. While it initially appears that Richard Gaffin is employing the context principle to bolster his stance, a comprehensive examination will ultimately reveal its limitations. I look forward to sharing further insights that will clarify this perspective and highlight the need for a more robust argument.
Wayne Jackson, another Restorationist, agrees with Richard Gaffin.
Wayne Jackson (1937 – 2020)
Wayne Jackson, Churches of Christ preacher, apologist, and author/editor, who influenced many in conservative restoration movement circles through the pulpits, publications & writings on biblical apologetics. The public biography indicates he was born in Goodlettsville, Tennessee; worked at the church in Delta, CO; then preached at the East Main Street congregation in Stockton, CA from 1961. According to these same sources, he received an AA degree from Stockton College, a BA from Sacramento Baptist College, and an MA from the Alabama Christian School of Religion. Additionally, Jackson co-founded and served as long-time editor of the Christian Courier. Beginning publication in May 1965. He authored over thirty books on biblical/apologetic/theological subjects, as well as on numerous other topics such as science/creation, prophecy/government, and Acts. In this manner, both by working in a local congregation and by publishing consistently, Jackson has become one of the best-known authors/ministers within churches, with his writing and views spreading far beyond his individual congregation.39
All evidence considered, no, the first application of the prophecy was not just for the apostles alone; it was applied to all the disciples and followers of Christ who were gathered together, waiting and praying for the Gift of the Holy Spirit. This fact will be proven conclusively in a future segment.
The next theologian takes a position diametrically opposed to Wayne Jackson’s views.
John B. Polhill (1939 – )
John B. Polhill is a Baptist New Testament scholar who has taught for many years. His scholarly contributions to the fields of Luke-Acts and Paul have had a considerable impact. Mr. Polhill received his Bachelor’s degree from the University of Richmond and both Master of Divinity and Doctor of Philosophy degrees from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He also attended other graduate schools, including Harvard Divinity School, the University of St. Andrews, Princeton Theological Seminary, and the University of California-Berkeley. He began teaching at Southern Seminary in 1969 and was appointed to the James Buchanan Harrison Chair of New Testament Interpretation. At Southern, he also became Senior Professor of New Testament Interpretation. Dr. Polhill is most well-known nationally for his Acts commentary (New American Commentary) and his book on Paul and His Letters. In addition to these two books, Dr. Polhill has written or edited several reference materials, contributed to denominational publications, and authored numerous articles. As an active participant in both the Society of Biblical Literature and the National Association of Baptist Professors of Religion, Dr. Polhill has practiced what he teaches by serving as a senior pastor for churches in Virginia, Kentucky, and Massachusetts throughout his career.41 He explains his view on this question quite clearly,
“Who were the people gathered in the upper room? On whom did the Spirit descend? Was it the 120 mentioned in 1:15 or only the Twelve Apostles? In 2:14 Luke mentioned only the Twelve, but there it probably was to connect them with Peter’s speech, which appealed to their special role as eyewitnesses to the resurrection (2:32). The presence of the large crowd testifying to the witness of the Spirit-filled Christians (2:6–11) would indicate that the full 120 were involved, as would the text Peter quoted from Joel that refers to women as well as men prophesying (2:17–18)… Perhaps the clearest indication that the entire 120 received the Spirit at Pentecost is Joel’s inclusion of daughters as well as sons—all were prophesying. Joel undoubtedly had seen the Spirit’s outpouring only as a gift to Israel, and perhaps many of those Jewish-Christians at Pentecost saw it the same way. The remainder of Acts clarifies that the promise applies to the Gentiles as well: it is indeed poured out on ‘all people.'”42
I agree with John Polhill that the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit included more than just the apostles.
Ron Graham expresses his viewpoint, which aligns with Wayne Jackson’s.
Ron Graham (c. 1940 – )
Ron Graham is a preacher/teacher/writer for the Churches of Christ; best known as the preacher and webmaster for simplybible.com (also referred to on the website as “Simply Christians Australia”). In addition to describing his role as the author/webmaster, Graham provides information about his ministry in his bio section on the author’s page. He indicates he has been serving for approximately sixty years. Additionally, he states that he became a Christian at a very young age and began preaching by age nineteen. Moreover, he explains that the initial seven years of support were provided to him by the 11th and Birdwell Church of Christ in Big Spring, Texas. Further, the author’s page portrays Graham’s ministry as a combination of both supported preaching and secular employment. Finally, it identifies Graham’s ministry primarily within Australian Churches of Christ, with publications, video-teaching, missionary service in Vanuatu, and pulpit service at the Bundaberg church of Christ. According to Graham, he retired from pulpit service in May 2017 to focus all his time on developing simplybible.com. Graham stated that simplybible.com currently includes over 1,600 Bible study pages and has archived decades of his teachings. As such, his body of published works include: verse-by-verse studies on Acts and topical studies on subjects such as the Holy Spirit, the church, prophecy and Christian living; therefore, he can be most appropriately defined as a church based Bible teacher/study writer who has disseminated his influence via preaching, multiple distributed teaching ministries and an extensive independent online resource for students rather than via traditional academic appointments.43
“Jesus gave orders to the apostles whom he had chosen” (Acts 1:2), and it was to them that he promised the baptism of the Holy Spirit and the consequent power (Acts 1:4-8).”44
This is nothing new to this investigation. My thoughts are clear on the matter.
Windell Gann, a minister of the Church of Christ, supports the apostles-only position.
Windell Gann (1941 – )
Windell Gann is a Bible teacher and a Churches of Christ minister whose mission work has focused on congregational preaching, classroom study, and the production of study materials for Sunday school classes and individual readers. Public information from rogersville church of Christ indicates that he served more than forty years as a pulpit minister to various Sunday schools in Ohio and Alabama; served as the pulpit minister at rogersville church of Christ since 1986; retired from his position at rogersville church of Christ in 2006, but continues to teach bible classes and serve when needed. Information from Rogersville also shows that Gann holds several degrees in biblical studies and has a background in religious education. Windell Gann is also known for providing a substantial amount of free bible study materials, including sermon outlines, bible study lesson sheets, “Walking Through the Bible” resources, PowerPoint sermons, and a verse-by-verse commentary covering Acts through Revelation, which have been available on his website, the resource section of the Rogersville congregation’s website, and StudyLight. A historical account of the Fairfield/Faulkner area of Fairfield Township, Fayette County, Ohio, also notes that he began his preaching work there in 1961, following his graduation from Freed-Hamman College (and his marriage to Mary Ann) in 1963. Together, these sources present Gann as a practical Restoration Movement bible study teacher whose influence will come not so much through formal academic publications but rather through durable church-based bible study tools and commentary.45 According to Windell Gann,
“The proper antecedent of this pronoun is the Apostles, Acts 1:26 the last word (also last word in the Greek) in the previous verse. Some false doctrine have arise believing the entire 120 were speaking in tongues but this does not hold up under a close scrutiny of the scriptures.”46
This is the same main argument presented by all advocates of the apostles-only perspective.
Next, we will explore the brief comment Professor Grant Osborne has to say about this topic.
Grant R. Osborne (1942–2018)
Grant R. Osborne, an American evangelical New Testament scholar, made important contributions to the study of biblical hermeneutics, the Gospels, Revelation, and evangelical commentary. Osborne attended Fort Wayne Bible College, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and the University of Aberdeen. There, Osborne completed his PhD. For many years, he taught at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. As such, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School remembers him as one of its professors. His most notable works are The Hermeneutical Spiral, a widely read book on interpreting Scripture that won the 1993 Christianity Today Critics’ Choice Award, and commentaries on Matthew, Revelation, Romans, 1-3 John, and Hebrews. In addition, Osborne worked with Tyndale’s Bible Translation Committee on the New Living Translation, serving as the senior translator for the Gospels and Acts; this provides further evidence of his scholarly stature. Further proof of his scholarly stature can be found in the 2013 festschrift, On the Writing of New Testament Commentaries. 47
Finally, the promised day (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4) arrives, and the saints (the 120 of 1:15) are still gathered in the upper room awaiting the expected event.48
He suggests that more than the apostles were awaiting the promised Holy Spirit, indicating that he believes additional individuals, beyond just the twelve apostles, received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.
Biblical scholar Lee McDonald concurs.
Lee Martin McDonald (1942 – )
Lee Martin McDonald is an American New Testament scholar whose research on early Christianity and its role in the development of canonical authority and the canonization process has significantly impacted the study of early Christianity and canon formation. Lee M. McDonald received a Ph.D. in New Testament studies from the University of Edinburgh (1976) and later earned a Th.M. from Harvard University. Over the years, Lee McDonald served as President Emeritus and Professor of New Testament Studies at Acadia Divinity College, as Dean of the Faculty of Theology at Acadia University, and as past president of the Institute for Biblical Research. In addition to these positions, Lee McDonald has taught or lectured at many other schools, including Fuller Theological Seminary, Princeton Theological Seminary, and Sioux Falls Seminary. His most notable contributions are through his writing, which include, but are not limited to, The Formation of the Christian Biblical Canon, The Canon Debate, The Origin of the Bible, and Before There Was a Bible. Recent author profiles describe him as having authored or edited more than 30 books with around 160 articles/essays. This extensive scholarship has helped make him one of the most recognized evangelical voices on the origins and formation of the biblical canon.49 Pointing out what is written in Acts 2:1, he writes,
The “all” refers to the whole assembly of 120 rather than only to the Twelve (1:15), and the Holy Spirit came upon all of them.50
I believe that “all” refers to all the disciples of Christ who were gathered, waiting for the promised Holy Spirit.
Next is David Peterson, who also holds the same view as Lee McDonald.
David G. Peterson (1944 – )
David G. Peterson is a theologian who specializes in New Testament studies. He is also an ordained Anglican priest. His research has had a significant influence on the study of Luke-Acts, the book of Hebrews, the theology of St. Paul, the doctrine of Christian holiness (or sanctification), and the biblical theology of worship. Dr. Peterson was an emeritus professor at Moore Theological College in Sydney and still occasionally teaches there. Moore indicates that Dr. Peterson holds the degrees ThL, BA, MA (Sydney), BD (London), ThSchol, and PhD (Manchester). Dr. Peterson was Principal of Oak Hill College in London from 1996 through 2007. His Profile indicates that he has engaged in pastoral ministry in the Dioceses of Sydney, Chester, and London. Dr. Peterson’s most notable scholarly contributions are: The Acts of the Apostles in the Pillars New Testament Commentary Series; Romans in the New Testament. David Peterson shares Lee McDonald’s view. Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary Series: Engaging With God, Possessed By God, Transformed By God, and Hebrews and Perfection. By combining the roles of institutional leader, ordained pastor, and prolific author, Dr. Peterson has established himself as one of the most well-known and respected evangelical scholars, whose scholarship demonstrates both careful attention to detail in textual analysis and a connection to the broader theological concerns of the Church. 51
“Despite the prominence of the Twelve in the preceding chapter, it is likely that those gathered together included the 120 disciples mentioned in 1:15.”52
Again, my conviction is that a clear exegetical analysis of the text supports that “all” refers to all the disciples of Christ who were gathered, waiting for the promised Holy Spirit.
Ben Witherington III shares the same perspective on this issue.
Ben Witherington III (1951 – )
Ben Witherington III is a New Testament scholar who has had a major impact in the study of the historical Jesus, Paul’s writings, and the field of socio-rhetorical exegesis. Dr. Witherington graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (BA), Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (MDiv.), and the University of Durham (PhD., 1981; emphasis was in New Testament Theology) under C.K. Barrett. His teaching experience includes time at High Point College, Duke Divinity School, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, and Ashland Theological Seminary, and he has served as the Jean R. Amos Professor of New Testament for Doctoral Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary since 1995. Dr. Witherington has authored over sixty books. He has authored commentaries for every book in the New Testament. Books like The Jesus Quest and The Paul Quest have established Dr. Witherington as an authority in providing the scholarly community with historically informed, literarily interpreted, and theologically relevant interpretations of scripture that are easily understood by both scholars and those reading in churches.53 He rightly says
“There is no indication that this phenomenon was only experienced by the Twelve as some sort of empowerment for leadership. To the contrary, what follows in Peter’s speech suggests the Spirit empowers the witness of all God’s people, including those of lowest social status. All in the room were filled with the Spirit and began to speak in ‘other tongues’ as the Spirit gave them utterance.”54
In my opinion, Ben Witherington is entirely correct.
In agreement with Geisler, Gaffin, and Snell, another Restorationist, Dave Mille, supports their viewpoint.
Dave Miller (1953 – )
Dave Miller (born 1953) is an apologist, author, and Bible teacher for the Churches of Christ who has been influential among conservative Restoration Movement thinkers regarding evidentialism in Christianity, authority of Scripture, church identity, and contemporary morality. From his Apologetics Press page, it appears that Mr. Miller obtained degrees at the following institutions: Lubbock Christian University, Texas Tech University, Harding School of Theology, and Southern Illinois University (where he earned his doctorate in rhetoric and public address). The same source(s) note that Mr. Miller has worked on a full-time basis for Apologetics Press since 2002, with 18 years as Executive Director from 2005 through 2023. Following his retirement from this position, he remained employed by the organization as a staff writer and consultant. Mr. Miller has authored many booklets, study guides, and other works. Among these are: “The Quran Unveiled”, “What the Bible Says About the Church of Christ”, “Surrendering to His Lordship”, “The Silencing of God”, and “Why People Suffer”.55 He teaches that…
“John [the baptizer] was not addressing a Christian audience. He was speaking to Jews. Nothing in the context allows the interpreter to distinguish John’s intended recipients of the promise of Holy Spirit baptism—whether all humans, all Jews, all Christians, or merely some of those in one or more of these categories. Likewise, the exact recipients of the baptism of fire (i.e., hell) are not specified. However, as is often the case in the Bible, the specific recipients of this promise are clarified in later passages… Jesus specifically and explicitly identified the Holy Spirit baptism that He would administer (in keeping with John’s prediction) would take place within a few days and would be confined to the apostles.”56
While the specific recipients of the promise of the Holy Spirit and the baptism of fire are not specified, there are no passages limiting either of those events to the apostles alone.
Let’s examine what Robert S. Liichow, the leader of Discernment Ministries, says about this topic.
Robert S. Liichow (1956-2014)
The late Robert S. Liichow was an author, speaker, and ministry consultant for discernment ministries. He is probably best known for founding the apologetic/polemical ministry Discernment Ministries International, whose purpose is “to teach Truth and expose Error.” Ministry materials report that Mr. Liichow attended the University of Michigan and then became heavily involved in the Charismatics and related expressions, such as the Word-of-Faith movement, Prophetic, Apostolic, Signs and Wonders, and Discipleship Movements. Those same ministry reports also say that both Mr. Liichow and his wife, Tracy, eventually exited the charismatic extreme movement after attending Michigan Theological Seminary, completing a Master’s Degree. In addition to being described as a prolific writer, church consultant, exit counselor, and a frequent radio guest, other public accounts state that Mr. Liichow later studied at Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne. Criticisms of Charismatic manifestations and revivals are commonly associated with Mr. Liichow’s work through Discernment Ministries International and in two of his writings entitled Blessing or Judgment? The Origins of Manifestations in the Church (2002), and The Two Roots of Today’s Revival (1997). Finally, publicly available documents show that by February 2014, he had passed away when his sister Donna L. Hurlbert posted his name on her obituary as one of several deceased brothers.57 Commenting on Acts 2:1, he states
“The ‘they’ being spoken of are the same ‘they’ Luke referred to in his Gospel account. There is nothing that indicates that the 120 other people gathered in that room were also recipients of that vocal gift. There is nothing stated anywhere in the Book of Acts that states or intimates anyone other than the apostles initially received this spiritual ability.”58
This statement can be quite amusing for those who have studied the relevant passages in depth, but it may also reveal his own bias. It’s important to note that the group referred to as “they” by Luke includes more than just the twelve disciples, as Luke 24:33-36 clearly shows. Why would he ignore the narrative information in the passage? We will explicitly demonstrate this later. Remember to read the text slowly.
Our last theologian for this section is Mark Dunagan, who agrees with Robert Liichow.
Mark Dunagan (c. 1958 – )
Mark Dunagan is a modern-day Bible commentator and teacher in the Churches of Christ who has created extensive free commentaries to assist in the study and teaching of scripture. According to publicly available ministry profiles, Mark has been involved in preaching and teaching since the early 1980’s; additionally, Mark has been associated with the Beaverton Church of Christ in Oregon for many years. The commentaries have been published on his website and at other locations, such as StudyLight and SermonIndex, and are presented as multi-volume works covering the entire Bible. He uses a practical-expositional approach in each volume, combining textual analysis, cross-referencing, and direct applications from the text. In addition to his commentaries, he also offers additional resources through his teaching ministry in audio, video, and online formats. As a result of this effort, Mark has become a recognized figure in conservative circles of the Restoration Movement as an author committed to providing an easy-to-understand, all-encompassing presentation of the Bible.58 In the Acts 2 section of his commentary, he writes,
“Various Charismatic groups try to argue that the ‘they’ of 2:1 includes the 120 mentioned in 1:15. They argue this because it is their contention that every Christian receives the baptism of the Holy Spirit. In response: (a) ‘the grammatical construction of 1:26 and 2:1 points only to the apostles as the recipients of the baptism with the Holy Spirit.’ The ‘they’ of 2:1 naturally refers back to the 12 apostles (the last group mentioned) in 1:26. (b) The only men speaking by inspiration upon this day will be the 12 apostles (2:14). (c) The crowd addressed their question to the apostles–inferring, they were the only ones manifesting that the Spirit had come upon them (2:37). (d) Only the apostles are working miracles (2:43; 3:1-6; 4:33; 5:12); until they lay their hands on others (Acts_6:6; Acts 6:8 ). (e) The assumption that every Christian was baptized in the Holy Spirit, is a false assumption to begin with (Acts 8:12-18; Acts 11:15-17; 1 Cor. 12:28-31).”59
His arguments mirror those of other proponents of the apostles-only position, although he has introduced a few additional points. There is a lot to address here, but I will save my responses for the article’s exegetical section.
Let’s continue this conversation into the twenty-first century, Part Five. This will be the final part of the historical investigation on this matter.
Edward Michael Zerr is identified as born on October 15, 1877, in Strasburg, Illinois, and as dying on February 22, 1960, in memorial records and later biographical notices. These same notices report that he moved with his family to Missouri, was baptized at age seventeen, preached for many years, served as an elder in New Castle, Indiana, and spent more than seven years in full-time labor producing his six-volume Bible Commentary. Retail and publication summaries further describe him as having preached for 58 years, delivered more than 8,000 sermons, and contributed to several religious periodicals. ↩︎
E. M. Zerr, Bible Commentary, vol. 5, Matthew to Revelation (n.p.: Mission Messenger, 1952), comment on Acts 1:5. ↩︎
E. M. Zerr, Bible Commentary, vol. 5, Matthew to Revelation (n.p.: Mission Messenger, 1952), comment on Acts 2:1. ↩︎
Thomas Walker is identified as “Thomas Walker [1881–1950]” in the bibliographic records for The Acts of the Apostles. The Indian Church Commentaries (Madras: SPCK Depository, 1910) and Is Not This The Son of Joseph? An Exposition of the relevant chapters of the Gospels in the Light of Jewish Culture (London: James Clarke & Co., [1937]. ↩︎
T. Walker, The Acts of the Apostles (New York: The MacMillan Co., 1919), 16. ↩︎
James Burton Coffman Biography, ACU Press & Leafwood Publishers, accessed March 29, 2026; “James Burton Coffman Papers, 1901–1990,” finding aid, Center for Restoration Studies Archives, Abilene Christian University, published December 10, 2021; Staff Reports, “Minister Burton Coffman Dies at 101,” The Christian Chronicle, August 1, 2006; “Books Available—Coffman’s Commentaries on the Bible,” StudyLight.org, accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
James Burton Coffman, Coffman Commentaries, vol. 5, 37 vols. (Abilene, TX: Abilene Christian University Press, 1974), notes on Acts 2. ↩︎
“Dupont, Jacques (1915–1998),” Bibliothèque nationale de France, which identifies him as a Benedictine of Saint-André de Clerlande, doctor of theology at Louvain in 1946, an exegete specializing in Acts, and a participant in the translation of the Bible de Jérusalem; see also Persée authority record, “Dupont, Jacques,” giving the same scholarly profile; and Mark Barnes, The Gift of Prophecy in the New Covenant, citing Jacques Dupont’s article “Le Salut des Gentils et la signification théologique du livre des Actes,” New Testament Studies 6 (1959–60): 132–55. ↩︎
Jacques Dupont, The Salvation of the Gentiles: Essays on the Acts of the Apostles. Translated by John R. Keating. New York: Paulist, 1979, 38. ↩︎
Donald F. DeWelt is identified as “Donald F. ‘Don’ DeWelt (1919–1991)” in memorial records, giving his birth and death dates as February 19, 1919, and June 12, 1991. Institutional histories further note that he taught at Ozark Bible College from 1957 to 1985 and founded College Press in 1959. His published works include Acts Made Actual and The Power of the Holy Spirit, the latter identifying him on its title page as “Professor at Ozark Bible College, Joplin, Missouri.” ↩︎
Don DeWelt, Acts Made Actual (Joplin, Missouri: College Press, 1958), p. 35. ↩︎
“Roy Gingrich,” Faithlife author profile, accessed April 6, 2026; “Roy Edward Gingrich Obituary,” Legacy.com (from The Commercial Appeal), published December 2005, accessed April 6, 2026. “Roy Gingrich’s Commentaries in Outline Form (100 vols.),” Logos, accessed April 6, 2026; Roy E. Gingrich, The New Testament Survey, Biblia preview, accessed April 6, 2026; Roy E. Gingrich, Introduction to Theology (Volume One), Biblia preview, accessed April 6, 2026; Roy E. Gingrich, “The Book of Genesis Introduction,” PDF hosted at Roy Gingrich Ministries, accessed April 6, 2026. Roy Gingrich Ministries, homepage, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
Roy E. Gingrich, The Book of Acts (Memphis, TN: Riverside Printing, 2002), 9. ↩︎
“Missionary Baptist Seminary,” Encyclopedia of Arkansas, which identifies Albert Garner as a notable graduate, writer, debater, and founder of Florida Baptist Schools; and The Encyclopedia of Religious Debates, which lists “Albert Garner [Missionary Baptist Church], August 1, 1920 … August 23, 2007” and identifies him within the public debate tradition. ↩︎
Langham Partnership, “About John Stott, Langham Partnership Founder,” accessed March 29, 2026; John Stott, “Life,” johnstott.org, accessed March 29, 2026; David Turner, “The Rev John Stott Obituary,” The Guardian, July 28, 2011; Lausanne Movement, “Story of Lausanne,” accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “John R. W. Stott,” author page, accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “Books by John Stott,” accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
John R. W. Stott, The Message of Acts: The Spirit, the Church & the World, The Bible Speaks Today (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994), 78. ↩︎
“Joe Hisle Obituary,” Legacy Remembers, published December 21, 2009, accessed April 6, 2026; Joe J. Hisle, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles (Yukon, OK: Contending for the Faith Publications, 2002); Let No Man Despise Thy Youth (Sermons by Joe Hisle) (LaGrange, GA: Bible Way Publications), product description, Legacy Music Publishing, accessed April 6, 2026; “Sermons by Joe Hisle,” Ada Church of Christ, accessed April 6, 2026; “Joe Hisle,” Let the Bible Speak, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
Joe J. Hisle, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, Contending for the Faith (Yukon, OK: Contending for the Faith Publications, 2002), notes on Acts 2. ↩︎
Jay E. Adams, “Author Interview with Jay Adams,” P&R Publishing, February 20, 2015; Donn R. Arms, “Dr. Jay E. Adams,” Institute for Nouthetic Studies, August 17, 2023. Westminster Media, “Pastoral Theology,” accessed April 7, 2026; Christian Counseling & Educational Foundation, “Beliefs & History,” accessed April 7, 2026; Jay E. Adams, Competent to Counsel (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1970); Zondervan, “Jay E. Adams,” author page, accessed April 7, 2026d ↩︎
Jay E. Adams, Acts, The Christian Counselor’s Commentary (Cordova, TN: Institute for Nouthetic Studies, 2020), 8. ↩︎
“About – Norman Geisler,” Norman Geisler’s official website, which describes him as a prolific author, professor, philosopher, apologist, evangelist, and theologian; “A Personal Tribute to Dr. Norman Geisler,” Southern Evangelical Seminary, which highlights his institutional leadership and influence in evangelical apologetics; and “Who Was Norman Geisler?” GotQuestions, which summarizes his role as an architect of the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy and his major scholarly emphases. ↩︎
Norman Geisler, “Appendix One: Only the Apostles Spoke in Tongues at Pentecost,” in Systematic Theology: Church, Last Things, vol. 4, 4 vols. (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 2005), locations 17693, Kindle Edition; ↩︎
“Francis Nigel Lee Manuscript Collection – MS#099,” PCA Historical Center, which summarizes Lee’s birth in England, childhood move to South Africa, 1957 conversion, academic degrees, and later ministerial and teaching career; “Dr. Francis Nigel Lee,” Frontline Fellowship memorial notice, December 23, 2011; and “Francis Nigel Lee,” biographical summary. ↩︎
Francis Nigel Lee, “Calvinism on the Holy Spirit: John Calvin on the Constant Need to Keep on Being Filled with the Spirit” (Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Presbyterian Theological College, n.d.), accessed August 20, 2024, https://www.scribd.com/document/109894544/coths, 23. ↩︎
University of Aberdeen, “Rev Prof Howard Marshall,” News, December 17, 2015, accessed March 29, 2026; BiblicalTraining, “I. Howard Marshall,” professor profile, accessed March 29, 2026. Methodist-Wesley Research Centre, “Marshall,” accessed March 29, 2026; Eerdmans Publishing, “I. Howard Marshall,” author page, accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “I. Howard Marshall,” author page, accessed March 29, 2026; Eerdmans Publishing, The Gospel of Luke, book page, accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, Acts, book page, accessed March 29, 2026. Ray Van Neste, “I. Howard Marshall, New Testament Scholar, Dies at 81,” The Gospel Coalition, December 12, 2015. ↩︎
I. Howard Marshall, The Acts of the Apostles: An Introduction and Commentary (India: Inter-Varsity Press, 1980), 68. ↩︎
Richard H. Snell is identified as the author of doctrinal and exegetical articles published by the Lexington Church of Christ, including “Who Were Baptized In The Holy Spirit On The Day Of Pentecost?” and “The Veil of the Tabernacle and the Great Controversy as Taught by E. G. White and the Seventh Day Adventists.” These sources establish him as a Church of Christ writer and Bible teacher. ↩︎
“Truth Magazine Volume 40 – 1996,” Truth Magazine, accessed April 6, 2026; “Truth Magazine Volume 45 – 2001,” Truth Magazine, accessed April 6, 2026; Carl A. Allen, “Did 120 Receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:1-4?,” La Vista Church of Christ, September 19, 2007, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
“Theologian and Churchman Richard B. Gaffin Jr.,” New Horizons (Orthodox Presbyterian Church), which notes his birth in Peiping, China, in 1936, his missionary family background, and his long role in the life of the OPC; “The Rev. Dr. Richard B. Gaffin Jr.,” Ordained Servant (Orthodox Presbyterian Church), on his interwoven ministry with Westminster Theological Seminary and the OPC; and Westminster Theological Seminary media, describing him as Professor Emeritus of Biblical and Systematic Theology. ↩︎
Richard B. Gaffin Jr., Perspectives on Pentecost: Studies in the New Testament Teaching on the Gifts of the Holy Spirit (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1979). ↩︎
Boyd Wayne Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson,” Old Paths Archive, accessed April 7, 2026; “Wayne Jackson and members of the East Main Church of Christ in Stockton, California, launched the Christian Courier in May 1965,” Christian Courier, “About,” accessed April 7, 2026; Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson.” Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson.”; “On the Shelf: New items added to Center for Restoration Studies collections, March 2024,” Abilene Christian University Special Collections, June 11, 2024; Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson.” ↩︎
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Southern Seminary Catalog, 2003–2004 (Louisville, KY: The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2003), 50; John B. Polhill, “The Setting of 2 John and 3 John,” Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 10, no. 3 (Fall 2006): 28; B&H Academic, “John Polhill,” contributor page, accessed March 29, 2026; Faithlife, “Paul and His Letters,” author information, accessed March 29, 2026. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Southern Seminary Catalog, 2008–2009 (Louisville, KY: The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2008), 43, 153. ↩︎
John B. Polhill, Acts, vol. 26, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1992), 97. ↩︎
Ron Graham, “Author of simplybible — Ron Graham,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Ron Graham, “Lessons Taught at Bundaberg — Period 2009–2017,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Ron Graham, “Acts Chapter One — Acts 1:1–8 Verse by Verse,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Ron Graham, “Topical Index,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Blacktown Church of Christ, “Bible Commentary Links,” accessed April 9, 2026. ↩︎
Rogersville Church of Christ, “Windell Gann,” accessed April 6, 2026; Rogersville Church of Christ, “Bible Study Material,” accessed April 6, 2026; Windell Gann, “Windell Gann: Bible Study Resources,” accessed April 6, 2026; StudyLight.org, “Books Available—Gann’s Commentary on the Bible,” accessed April 6, 2026; Selected Histories of Fayette County Churches (Fayette County Public Library, n.d.), 20. ↩︎
“Obituary for Dr. Grant R. Osborne,” Laura Sambrano Funeral Chapel, published November 2018; InterVarsity Press, “The Hermeneutical Spiral,” author and book page. Trinity International University, a news item referring to Osborne as a former TEDS professor; Tyndale House Publishers, “Grant R. Osborne, 1942–2018”; Tyndale, “Meet the Bible Translation Committee.”; Brill, On the Writing of New Testament Commentaries: Festschrift for Grant R. Osborne on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday. ↩︎
Grant R. Osborne, Acts: Verse by Verse, Osborne New Testament Commentaries (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2019), 39–59. ↩︎
University of Edinburgh School of Divinity, “Professor Lee Martin McDonald,” accessed April 7, 2026; Lee Martin McDonald, author profile, AbeBooks, accessed April 7, 2026; Lee McDonald, faculty profile, Academia.edu, accessed April 7, 2026; Rob Heaton, “Lee Martin McDonald, Before There Was a Bible: Authorities in Early Christianity (T&T Clark, 2023),” New Books Network, May 26, 2023; Bloomsbury, “Lee Martin McDonald,” author page, accessed April 7, 2026; Lee Martin McDonald, “The Emergence of Biblical Canons in Orthodox Christianity,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in Orthodox Christianity, Oxford Academic, published May 19, 2022. ↩︎
Lee Martin McDonald, Acts, in The Bible Knowledge Background Commentary: Acts–Philemon, ed. Craig A. Evans and Craig A. Bubeck, First Edition. (Colorado Springs, CO: David C Cook, 2004), 26–28. ↩︎
Moore Theological College, “The Rev Dr David G Peterson,” faculty profile, accessed April 7, 2026; David G. Peterson, “About,” David G. Peterson – Biblical Theology and Worship, accessed April 7, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “David G. Peterson,” author page, accessed April 7, 2026; David Peterson, The Acts of the Apostles (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009), author description; Google Books bibliographic entry; Credo Magazine, “David Peterson on the New Covenant,” September 2012, accessed April 7, 2026. ↩︎
David G. Peterson, The Acts of the Apostles, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI; Nottingham, England: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2009), 132. ↩︎
Ben Witherington III, “Curriculum Vitae,” Dr. Ben Witherington III, accessed March 29, 2026; Asbury Theological Seminary, “Dr. Ben Witherington III,” accessed March 29, 2026; Ben Witherington III, “About Dr. Ben,” Dr. Ben Witherington III, accessed March 29, 2026; Eerdmans Publishing, “Ben Witherington III,” accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
Ben Witherington III, The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998). (Kindle Locations 4382-4385). Kindle Edition. ↩︎
Apologetics Press, “Dave Miller,” author profile, accessed April 6, 2026; Apologetics Press, “AP Staff Spotlight: Dr. Dave Miller, AP Bible Department,” published October 1, 2025, accessed April 6, 2026; Apologetics Press, “New Executive Director of AP,” published August 10, 2023, accessed April 6, 2026; Dave Miller, The Quran Unveiled (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2005), Library of Congress cataloging data identifying the author as “Dave Miller (1953–); ”Dave Miller, What the Bible Says About the Church of Christ (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2007), Library of Congress cataloging data; Dave Miller, Surrendering to His Lordship (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2012); Apologetics Press, “Free PDF Books,” accessed April 6, 2026. Apologetics Press Store, “Why People Suffer,” accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
Dave Miller, “Modern-Day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation-EXTENDED,” Reason & Revelation 23, no. 3 (2003). ↩︎
“About Our Ministry,” Discernment Ministries International; “Blessing or Judgment?: The Origins of Manifestations in the Church,” Amazon book listing, accessed April 9, 2026; “Truth Matters – Lunacy in Lakeland – by Rev. Robert S. Liichow,” repost introduction, August 14, 2008, accessed April 9, 2026; Robert Liichow, Blessing or Judgment? The Origins of Manifestations in the Church (2002); Paul Fahy, The Charismatic Catastrophe, citing Robert S. Liichow, The Two Roots of Today’s Revival (Morris Publishing, 1997); “Donna L. (Liichow) Hurlbert Obituary,” Heffner Funeral Chapel & Crematory, February 15, 2014. ↩︎
Liichow, Robert. “Supernatural Speech in Acts.” Truth Matters (Detroit, MI), October 2013. ↩︎
“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the “Apostles-Only View” and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will continue to provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. In Part One, we examined theologians’ views on who the initial recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit were, from the early Church through the Reformation Era. In Part Two, we explored what theologians said about this topic through the eighteenth century. In this section, we will explore the nineteenth century, where the origins of the Apostles-Only Position begin. Let’s proceed to Part Three.
Exploring the Historical Background (Part Three)
~ The Debate Begins ~
This section continues our enlightening discussion regarding the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost! While John Chrysostom intriguingly posed the question of who received the Holy Spirit in the fourth century, it is fascinating to note that, to my knowledge, there has been no evidence suggesting that theologians believed exclusively in the Twelve Apostles as recipients until very recently, historically speaking. Most scholars up through the eighteenth century affirm that 120 or more devoted disciples received the Holy Spirit on that Pentecost. Yet, the nineteenth century introduced a compelling new perspective, igniting the modern debate surrounding the Apostles-Only position. I look forward to exploring these rich theological discussions with you!
Nineteenth Century (1800-1899)
This section will begin by exploring Adam Clarke’s contributions.
Adam Clarke (1762-1832)
Adam Clarke was an Irish-born Methodist Minister, Theologian, and biblical Commentator who, through his writings, was among the most important Wesleyan scholars of the Nineteenth Century. Born in Moybeg, County Londonderry, Ireland, Clarke received part of his education at Kingswood School, where he was under Methodist Influence. Entering the Itinerant Ministry in the Early Eighteen Eighties, Clarke eventually emerged as one of the most Important Intellectual Figures of British Methodism. As a result of his monumental work, “The Holy Bible…with a Commentary and Critical Notes,” and many other works in Theology, Philology, and Biblical Studies, Clarke became widely known and respected. Additionally, Clarke repeatedly served in leadership positions throughout his life in the Wesleyan Methodist Church. Clarke is often described as a man of great Learning, Tireless Literary Industry, and a Strong Defender of Methodist Theology. Clarke’s Legacy Endures particularly through his Biblical Commentary, which has had a Broad Influence in both Methodist and Evangelical Circles in Britain and America.1 In his commentary on Acts 2:1, Clarke writes:
“It is probable that the ‘all’ here mentioned means the one hundred and twenty spoken of Acts 1:15.” 2
Clarke’s statement challenges the Apostles-Only view by emphasizing that “they were all” specifically refers to the 120 individuals mentioned in Acts 1:15. While this interpretation is supported by most theologians, I believe the evidence indicates that more than 120 were initially filled with the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.
Agreeing with Clarke’s viewpoint, the Anglican clergyman James Ford offers his insights in the discussion.
James Ford (1797-1877)
James Ford was an English clergyman of the Church of England who wrote commentary books that made him one of the most important Bible interpreters of the nineteenth century. He attended Rugby School and Oriel College, Oxford. Ford received his B.A. degree in 1818; his M.A. degree in 1821; was ordained as a deacon in 1822; and as a priest in 1823. Ford served in several church positions, including a series of curacies in Northamptonshire, a curacy in Canterbury, a curacy in Exeter, and a prebendal stall in Exeter. In addition to the many other works he published throughout his career, Ford is best known for his illustrated commentaries on the Gospels and Acts. These include The Acts of the Apostles Illustrated. Ford also authored several devotional works, sermons, and translated works. Ford’s memorial notice from the time of his death describes him as “a man of scholarly accomplishment with a very large and generous heart.” His memorial notice also highlights Ford’s many years of productive ministry and his reputation for charity.3 James Ford writes, interestingly,
“They were all – what all? All the Apostles? No; all the disciples, all those hundred and twenty whereof we read (i. 15).4
What’s fascinating is that he poses the same question Chrysostom did many years ago and reaches the same conclusion: all 120 individuals received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.
Albert Barnes, a Presbyterian minister, poses the same thought-provoking question and arrives at the same insightful conclusion as James Ford.
Albert Barnes (1798–1870)
Albert Barnes, a Presbyterian minister and theologian, wrote the “Notes on the Bible,” which helped make him one of America’s most influential religious interpreters of the nineteenth century. Born in Rome, NY., Barnes attended Hamilton College and then Princeton Theological Seminary. After completing seminary, Barnes pastored in Morristown, NJ, and later at the First Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia. Barnes gained widespread recognition for his sermons and for the controversies surrounding his views on original sin and imputation. His commentaries on Scripture were unique because they provided a way for pastors, students, and lay readers to understand it, combining pastoral explanation and scholarly analysis. His commentaries were so successful that they influenced generations of Presbyterian and Evangelical Christians throughout the nineteenth century.5 In reference to Acts 2:4 and the phenomenon of speaking in tongues, he writes:
“From this it appears that the power was well known in the church, and was not confined to the apostles. This also may show that in the case in the Acts, the ability to do this was conferred on other members of the church as well as the apostles.”6
As can be seen, Barnes asserts that the remarkable Pentecost phenomenon reached far beyond the apostles, encompassing other devoted members of the Church as well.
This perspective resonates with the insightful Lutheran theologian Heinrich Meyer, who thoughtfully affirmed that the Gift of the Spirit extends beyond the twelve apostles to embrace a wider community!
Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer (1800-1873)
Heinrich Meyer was born into a Lutheran family in Gotha. He studied theology at Jena University. The bulk of Meyer’s career involved both pastoral and administrative roles. He served as pastor at Harste, Hoya, and Neustadt am Rübenberge before moving to Hanover. At Hanover, Meyer served as Superintendent and was a member of the Church Consistory. His greatest contribution to the field of biblical studies was his creation of a major multi-volume commentary titled “Kritisch-Exegetischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament,” which appeared starting in 1832. This Commentary and Meyer’s subsequent contributions influenced generations of Protestant Bible scholars, and it remained a commonly used reference throughout the remainder of the 19th century.7 In his analysis of Acts 2:1, he observes that…
“These πάντες, all, were not merely the apostles, but all the followers of Jesus then in Jerusalem, partly natives and partly strangers, including the apostles. For, first of all, it may certainly be presumed that on the day of Pentecost, and, moreover, at the hour of prayer (Acts 2:15), not the apostles alone, but with them also the other μαθηταί—among whom there were, without doubt, many foreign pilgrims to the feast—were assembled. Moreover, in Acts 2:14, the apostles are distinguished from the rest. Further, the πάντες, designedly added, by no means corresponds to the small number of the apostles (Acts 1:26), especially as in the narrative immediately preceding mention was made of a much greater assembly (Acts 1:15); it is, on the contrary, designed—because otherwise it would have been superfluous—to indicate a still greater completeness of the assembly, and therefore it may not be limited even to the 120 persons alone. Lastly, it is clear also from the prophetic saying of Joel, adduced in Acts 2:16 ff., that the effusion of the Spirit was not on the apostles merely, but on all the new people of God, so that ἅπαντες (Acts 2:1) must be understood of all the followers of Jesus (of course, according to the latitude of the popular manner of expression).”8
Meyer is a particularly important source because he not only rejects the notion that only the apostles initially received the Spirit on Pentecost, but he also broadens the reference beyond just the Twelve apostles and the strict limit of 120 followers. To this assertion, I say, “Amen.” I believe he understands the relevant passages exactly as intended. The Holy Spirit was initially received not just by the twelve or the 120, but by all the disciples who were gathered together that day.
Johann Lange shares a belief that closely resonates with Meyer’s, highlighting the remarkable similarities in their perspectives that will be further explored shortly.
Johann Peter Lange (1802-1884)
As a German Protestant theologian, pastor, and biblical scholar, Johann Peter Lange (1802-1884) has been recognized as an influential Reformed voice in continental theology and commentaries from the mid-nineteenth century onward. Born to a rural family near Elberfeld, Germany, Lange attended seminary at Bonn; subsequently, he served as a pastor and eventually took positions as professor at Zürich and then again at Bonn. The breadth of his scholarly contributions spanned many areas, including biblical studies, dogma, Christian ethics, and the life of Christ. However, he is best known for his extensive commentary series, later published under the title Lange’s Commentary on the Holy Scriptures. His work combined theologically imaginative insights, pastoral concerns, and an impressive body of writing, exerting considerable influence over nineteenth-century Protestant biblical hermeneutics in Europe and the English-speaking world.9 In Acts 2:4, Lange expresses a belief similar to that of Meyer, stating:
“Who are the persons that were assembled, and that received the gift of the Holy Ghost? We are informed, Acts 2:1, that they were all with one accord in one place. It is at once obvious that not the apostles alone, but other disciples also, were present, and received the gift of the Holy Ghost. The correctness of this view is fully proved by Acts 2:14, in which the twelve apostles are plainly distinguished from other persons who were also filled with the Spirit and spake with other tongues. Still, even when this fact is admitted, one point remains, on which a difference of opinion exists:—Were only the 120 disciples, mentioned in Acts 1:15, present, or was a still larger number of persons assembled, and were all these endowed with the Holy Spirit? The former opinion is generally adopted, but the latter will appear to be better sustained when we consider that the day was a high festival of me old covenant, when those disciples of Jesus who did not reside in Jerusalem, or whom an express command of the Lord had not previously summoned, were, doubtless, also present in the city; it is natural to suppose that they, too, would assemble with the other disciples. Consequently, not only the twelve apostles, but the whole number of the disciples of Jesus who were then present in the city, were assembled together and shared in the effusion of the Spirit.”10
Elsewhere, he restates his position.
“Not only the apostles, but all the other disciples also, were filled with the Holy Ghost.”11
Building on this idea, Lange explains,
“The gift of the Holy Ghost was not at that time, and is not now, an exclusive privilege of a particular office (not even of the highest in the Church—that of the Apostles), nor of any rank or either sex, but is the gracious gift of the Lord, bestowed on all who believe in him.”12
Lange serves as a compelling and direct witness against the Apostles-Only position, emphasizing that Pentecost illustrates the Spirit’s gift extends beyond the Twelve Apostles.
The Methodist Daniel Denison Whedon notably supports this perspective, which adds to its credibility.
Daniel Denison Whedon (1808-1885)
Daniel Denison Whedon was an American Methodist minister, theologian, writer/editor, and Bible commentator. His writings made him one of the most prominent intellectual figures in Wesleyan circles during the nineteenth century. Whedon was born in Onondaga County, NY. He attended Hamilton College. After an early career as a teacher/academic, he entered the Methodist ministry. Whedon worked in both pastoral and academic roles. Some notable positions include serving as President of Wesleyan University and as Editor of The Methodist Quarterly Review for many years. As the Editor of The Methodist Quarterly Review, Whedon played a key role in shaping Methodist theological and literary discussion in the United States. Whedon is best known for his Commentaries on the Holy Scriptures and A Popular Commentary on the New Testament. These commentaries were unique because they used Methodist theology to explain the practical applications of Scripture. Additionally, Whedon engaged with scholarly research. Through his preaching, editorial leadership, and Biblical writings, Whedon’s influence on nineteenth-century American Methodism and evangelical interpretations of the Bible has been enduring.13 When Whedon explains the phrase “All with one accord” in Acts 2:1, he provides a detailed interpretation.
“The same one accord as in Acts 1:14, of the same body enumerated in Acts 1:15; namely, the about one hundred and twenty names representative of the New Testament Church.”14
Lange taught around 120 disciples who received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.
We will now explore whether Joseph Alexander agrees with this assessment.
Joseph Addison Alexander (1809-1860)
Joseph Addison Alexander, a prominent American Presbyterian clergyman, professor, and biblical scholar, authored many works that would place him among the major Princeton theologians of the Nineteenth Century. A native of Philadelphia, the son of Archibald Alexander, Joseph’s extraordinary ability to learn and apply classical knowledge and languages was apparent at a very young age. He graduated from the College of New Jersey (now called Princeton University) in 1826 with the highest honors. After a few years of studying and teaching ancient languages in Germany, he accepted a position at Princeton Theological Seminary. He was appointed to chair various departments, including Oriental and Biblical Literature, Ecclesiastical History, and New Testament Literature. Through his work, particularly his scholarly and devotional commentaries on Isaiah, the Psalms, Mark, and Acts, he became well known throughout America for his scholarly yet reverent biblical commentary. His work was distinguished by combining philological breadth, theological depth, and pastoral concern. As such, his influence on the development of American Presbyterian scholarship and biblical interpretation in the Nineteenth Century will be long enduring.15 Alexander discusses Acts 2:1 and the significance of the word “all.” He explores its implications within the context of the passage.
“All is strong, but not a definite expression, i.e., not one that determines what precise number, or what specific class of persons, were assembled upon this occasion. It must therefore be interpreted by the foregoing narrative, in which we read of two assemblages, the first of the eleven (1:4), and the second of a hundred and twenty persons (1:15). The proximity of this last, and the strength of the expression all, seem to forbid its restriction to the twelve, but not its extension to a greater number than a hundred and twenty.16
He then explains that…
“it seems most probable that all here designates that body,”17
…referring to the larger assembly mentioned in Acts 1:15, Alexander is one of the clearest mid-century witnesses against the Apostles-Only reading.
One of the strongest witnesses against the Apostles-only paradigm is the New Testament scholar, Henry Alford.
Henry Alford (1810-1871)
Henry Alford (1810-1871) was an important clergyman, theologian, New Testament scholar, Commentator on Scripture, and biblical authority within the Church of England. He was born in London, studied at Trinity College, Cambridge,e and became the most influential New Testament interpreter of the Nineteenth Century through his exegesis. Alford began studying classics, poetry, rhetoric, and theology at a young age. After graduating from Trinity College, he took Holy Orders in the Church of England and served in various clerical positions. He became the Dean of Canterbury in 1857. Alford is best known for his Greek Testament and The New Testament for English Readers. His two books were an application of textual criticism, linguistic knowledge, and practical commentary. Therefore, Alford is considered one of the most influential English biblical scholars of his time. However, Alford’s influence went far beyond the confines of academia. He was also known as a speaker, hymn writer, poet, and publisher.18 Alford is the third theologian, following Myer and Lange, to explicitly state that those who initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost included more than just the 120 individuals. In his Commentary on Acts 2:1, Henry Alford clearly articulates this point.
“Not the Apostles only, nor the hundred and twenty mentioned ch. Acts 1:15; but all the believers in Christ, then congregated at the time of the feast in Jerusalem.The former is manifest from Acts 2:14, when Peter and the eleven stand forward and allude to the rest as οὗτοι: and the latter follows on the former being granted. Both are confirmed by the universality of the promise cited by Peter, Acts 2:17 ff.”19
Notice how he suggests a distinction is made between the believers who received the Holy Spirit and the twelve apostles who stood with Peter. This interpretation will become important as we continue to investigate this question. He reiterates this same idea in Acts 2:14:
“Peter and the eleven come forward from the great body of believers.”20
Later, Alford continues by saying that Peter
“distinguishes … himself and the eleven from the rest,”21
and therefore reads Peter’s statement, “these are not drunken,” as referring to individuals outside the twelve apostles. As mentioned earlier, Alford stands out as a remarkable nineteenth-century authority who opposed the Apostles-Only perspective while strongly supporting the belief that more than 120 individuals initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit.22 I wholeheartedly share this perspective and appreciate the depth of his insights.
The Presbyterian minister, Melanchthon Jacobus, confidently endorses the same understanding.
Melancthon Williams Jacobus (1816–1876)
Melancthon William Jacobus was a Presbyterian minister, educator, and Bible interpreter. He produced a large body of practical exegetical literature that contributed to his status as a prominent nineteenth-century American Reformed interpreter. As a theologian of Presbyterian theological education, he is also well remembered for his extensive “Notes, Critical & Explanatory” series of commentaries on many biblical books, including his Commentary on Acts. Jacobus’s writing was intended for both ministers, students, and educated laity; as such, he blended serious doctrine with practical, accessible Exposition. His Acts commentary, first published in 1869 and later reprinted, established his reputation as one of America’s most respected interpreters of the New Testament during the late nineteenth century. 23 Adding to the historical consensus on the matter before us in this article is Melancthon Jacobus. He writes.
“This includes such as may have assembled besides the 120, and doubtless there were many Christian Disciples who had come to the feast.”24
I believe that Melancthon Jacobus is correct in stating that over 120 people initially received the Holy Spirit. I will later provide detailed evidence for this belief through hermeneutical and exegetical analysis.
Let’s take a moment to consider Philip Schaff’s perspective on this issue.
Philip Schaff (1819–1893)
Philip Schaff (1819-1893), born in Chur, Switzerland, studied theology at the University of Stuttgart and later at the Universities of Tübingen, Halle, and Berlin. At the University of Berlin, he was influenced by prominent German scholars, notably August Neander. In 1844, he emigrated to the U.S. and was appointed Professor of Church History and Biblical Literature at the German Reformed Theological Seminary in Mercersburg, Pa. His inaugural address, “The Principle of Protestantism,” caused controversy; however, it was instrumental in shaping the Mercersburg school. Later, he would be appointed Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Union Theological Seminary in New York City. It is through his numerous writings, including “History of the Christian Church”, “Creeds of Christendom”, and his editing work on early church and bible reference materials, that Schaff’s name has become well-known. It is through his scholarly writings, his ecumenical vision, and his editorial leadership that Schaff has become one of the most influential Protestant church historians of the 19th century.25 According to Philip Schaff, what is meant by the word “all” under the heading “They were all together” is explained:
“All here certainly includes more than the twelve apostles, as when Peter (Acts 2:14), standing up with the eleven, evidently speaks of many others on whom the Spirit had fallen. Very possibly, ‘all’ refers to the ‘hundred and twenty mentioned in chap. Acts 1:15. Many modern commentators prefer to understand from this expression a still larger company, composed of all believers then assembled in Jerusalem. Augustin and Chrysostom assume that the assembly on whom the Spirit fell was composed of the ‘hundred and twenty’ only.” 26
I fully agree with the scholars that the term “all” effectively refers to a broader group beyond the twelve or 120 disciples.
Michael Sadler, our next theologian, suggests it was likely around 120, but not more than that.
Michael Ferrebee Sadler (1819-1895)
Michael Ferrebee Sadler (1819-1895), an Anglican theologian, clergyman, and Commentator on Scripture, wrote a wide range of theological writings, making him one of the most well-known of the popular High Church theologians of the latter half of the nineteenth century. Born in Leeds, he was the firstborn son of the social reformer Michael Thomas Sadler; he attended Sherborne School and studied at St John’s College, Cambridge. He was elected as the Hebrew scholar under Tyrwhitt’s patronage in 1846 and was awarded the Bachelor of Arts degree by Cambridge University in 1847. In addition to being vicar of Bridgwater and vicar of StPaul’s’s, Bedford, he was also the rector of Honiton; during his ministry, he was also assigned to the prebend of Combe in Wells Cathedral. His many works, both theological, devotional, and exegetical, established him as a prominent figure. These include: The Sacrament of Responsibility, The Second Adam and the New Birth, Church Doctrine, Bible Truth, and his multi-volume Commentary on the New Testament, in particular, The Acts of the Apostles with Notes Critical and Practical. As a High Churchman, he wrote prolifically defending Tractarian and sacramental theology; these writings were distributed throughout England and read by many Anglicans.” 27 Michael Sadler proposes that when…
“They were all with one accord in one place. They were all: this seems to point to the one hundred and twenty as well as the Apostle.” 28
Additionally, Sadler makes a very good point.
“Now it appears to me that the position of the Apostles, as the sole source of ministerial power and authority in the Church, is in no way affected by the diffusion of this gift amongst the hundred and twenty, if so it was. For the Spirit at Pentecost was not given for the government of the Church, but for its diffusion, and for the sanctification of its members.” 29
I appreciate Michael Sadler’s emphasis that the Holy Spirit was not given at Pentecost solely for the governance of the Church, but rather for every member of it. This perspective will be examined further, particularly in relation to the argument presented by those who adhere to the “Apostles-Only” position.
In agreement with the perspectives of Jacubus and Schaff, Paton Gloag also emphasizes that over 120 individuals joyfully received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on that significant Pentecost!
Paton James Gloag (1823–1906)
Paton James Gloag was a Free Church Scottish Minister, Biblical Scholar, and commentator whose work in the New Testament made him one of the most well-respected exegetes in nineteenth-century Free Church Scholarship. A graduate of the University of Glasgow and New College, Edinburgh, Gloag was first called to the Pastoral Ministry at Galashiels and, after that, was an influential leader in the United Presbyterian Church of Scotland and Moderator of that Church. Gloag is best known for his Exegetical Works on the New Testament. His other notable contributions include his two-volume commentary on the Acts of the Apostles (1870). In addition to these, Gloag also wrote Introductions and Commentaries to Pauline Writings, Catholic Writings, and Johannine Writings. Gloag was also instrumental in translating many important German Commentaries into English, including Lechler’s, Meyer’s, Lünemann’s, and Huther’s. As such, Gloag helped bring Continental Scholarship to the Theological World.30 Commenting on Acts 2:1, he states
“The persons present are not to be restricted to the apostles, nor even to the hundred and twenty disciples who met in the upper room after the ascension, because many of our Lord’s numerous followers in Galilee would have come up to Jerusalem to the feast, and would have been present on this occasion.”31
Along with Jacubus, Schaff, and Gloag, I am convinced that Scripture teaches that more than 120 individuals received the Holy Spirit during the first outpouring. This topic will be explored in detail later.
The lively debate over the initial recipients of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost owes much to John William McGarvey’s perspective. His influential contributions have sparked extensive debate, inspiring further investigation, to say the least.
John William McGarvey (1829 -1911)
John William McGarvey (1829-1911), a prominent figure in the American Restoration Movement, was a minister, educator, biblical scholar, and interpreter who wrote extensively and became among the most influential interpreters of conservative scriptural churches of Christ and similar Restorationist movements. He attended Bethany College in West Virginia during the tenure of Alexander Campbell. Later, he became closely affiliated with the College of the Bible in Lexington, Kentucky, where he spent many years as an instructor and ultimately as President. He developed a lasting legacy in the areas of Acts, evidence, and biblical interpretation, and is best remembered for defending the historical accuracy of the scriptures and opposing “higher criticism” and theological liberalism. His influence extended through his teachings, debates, and written commentaries, which affected the interpretation of the Bible in the Restorationist tradition for several generations.32 McGarvey addresses the issue in this article with clarity:
“The persons thus assembled together and filled with the Holy Spirit WERE NOT, as many have supposed, the one hundred and twenty disciples mentioned in a parenthesis in the preceding chapter, but the twelve apostles. This is made certain by the grammatical connection between the first verse of this chapter and the last of the preceding.”33
Is one singular “grammatical connection” between Acts 2:1 and Acts 1:26 enough evidence to support his claim? There is a great deal more to consider than one man’s simplistic misunderstanding of a grammar rule. This point will be explained further in this article. Suffice it to say, his point is not as strong as it appears here. He also argues that…
“It was to the apostles alone … that Jesus had promised the miraculous aid of the Spirit,” and “It involves both a perversion of the text, and a misconception of the design of the event, to suppose that the immersion in the Holy Spirit was shared by the whole hundred and twenty.”34
Is it really “a perversion of the text, and a misconception” to suppose that more than the twelve initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost? While most readers may not yet discern the exegetical problems with McGarvey’s interpretation, once all the evidence is gathered and explained, the objective reader will never be misled on this topic again. McGarvey was not only one of the most prominent and articulate advocates of the Apostles-Only interpretation in the nineteenth century, but also might be the first person in history to support this position.
Interestingly, his contemporary, Barton Johnson, holds a completely different view, even though both are recognized as ministers of the Restoration Movement.
Barton W. Johnson (1833-1894)
Barton W. Johnson (1833-1894), an American Restoration Movement minister/editor/evangelist/biblical commentator, is probably best known for The People’s New Testament. Johnson was associated with the Disciples of Christ stream of the Stone-Campbell movement and worked in both editorial and pulpit roles. According to a late nineteenth-century biographical notice, Johnson spent “about sixteen years” in editorial work at The Evangelist and later at the Christian-Evangelist; during this time, he produced and published several books that were widely read, including The Vision of the Ages, his commentary on John, The People’s New Testament, and a series of commentaries titled the Christian Lesson Commentary. Johnson is best known for providing clear explanations of the New Testament to ministers and laypeople in the Restoration tradition. His New Testament commentary remained widely used and respected long after Johnson’s death.35 Barton W. Johnson states that the recipients of Pentecost included not only the apostles but also 120 other disciples. He affirms that…
“They were all … in one place. Not only the apostles, but the hundred and twenty disciples.”36
He then goes on to say:
“At the same time the disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit, their spirits baptized in the Spirit.”37
In Acts 2:4, he is even more explicit:
“They were all filled with the Holy Spirit. All the disciples present.”38
Johnson also connects this to Acts 1 by noting that the group in Jerusalem numbered about 120 individuals who had been waiting together “for the promise of the Father.” 39 While I agree with Johnson that more than the apostles initially received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, I believe Scripture affirms that more than 120 disciples received the Holy Spirit on that day. It’s fascinating that Barton Johnson rejects the Apostles-Only perspective, interpreting Acts 2:1–4 to show that the Holy Spirit was received by all 120 disciples at Pentecost, not just the Twelve!
The Scottish minister Thomas Martin Lindsay aligns with Barton Johnson on this topic.
Thomas Martin Lindsay (1843–1914)
Thomas Martin Lindsay was a Scottish Free Church Minister, Church Historian, and Theological Educator. He was one of the leading historians of the Reformation throughout the latter part of the Nineteenth Century and the early Twentieth Century. Lindsay was born in Lesmahagow, Lanarkshire, and attended the Divinity Schools of Glasgow and Edinburgh to become a Free Church of Scotland Minister. Lindsay entered the Ministry of the Free Church of Scotland in 1869. In 1872, he was appointed Professor of Church History at the Free Church College in Glasgow. In 1902, he became Principal of the College, a position he held until his death. Lindsay published many books relating to Church History and Biblical Studies. His two most well-known publications were Luther and the German Reformation and A History of the Reformation. These publications helped to establish Lindsay’s reputation as a Scottish minister. Thomas Martin Lindsay expresses agreement with the upcoming discussions. Scottish minister Thomas Martin Lindsay expresses agreement with the upcoming discussions, an intelligent and impartial historian of Protestantism. Lindsay had a lasting impact on Scottish Ecclesiastical Scholarship through his teaching, historical research, and Leadership within Free Church Theological Education.” 40 He expresses his opinion in writing.
“They were all with one accord, together, R. V. The all probably includes more than the 120 persons, for Galileans would be at the feast.”41
I completely agree with the insightful perspective that over 120 disciples initially received the Spirit on Pentecost.
Next, we will examine Thomas Page’s insights on this issue.
Thomas Ethelbert Page (1850–1936)
Thomas Ethelbert Page was an English classical scholar and educator who is primarily recognized for combining a high degree of scholarly exactness with a profound influence on many students. Page received an education at both Shrewsbury School and St John’s College, Cambridge; however, it was his time at Charterhouse that would define him for over thirty-nine years as one of the greatest scholar-teachers of all time. His work with numerous editions of classical and biblical literature, such as Horace, Virgil, and “The Acts of the Apostles,” had a lasting impact on the education of countless students. After leaving Charterhouse, Page continued to shape the education of future generations, serving as one of the original editors of the Loeb Classical Library. In recognition of his contributions to classical studies, Page was appointed a Companion of Honor in 1934.42 When commenting on the word “All” in Acts 2:1, his statement is simple and to the point:
His statement summarizes the view I hold, which we will discuss in detail later in this article.
Let’s transition to discussing Richard Belward, an Anglican priest and biblical scholar.
Richard Belward Rackham (1863-1912)
The Rev. Richard Belward Rackham (1863-1912) was an Anglican priest, Biblical scholar, and writer who was an associate of the Community of the Resurrection. His work as a scholar contributed to his being regarded by many scholars in the first quarter of the 20th century as one of the most important interpreters of Acts. A resident of the Mirfield community, the Rev. Rackham was a member of an Anglican religious order that emphasized scholarship, education, and mission. He is particularly remembered for his Exposition of Acts in “The Acts of the Apostles”, which appeared in 1901, as the last volume in the Westminster Commentaries series. Additionally, the Community of the Resurrection records indicate that he was born on December 27, 1863, and professed at Radley on August 1, 1895, and died on August 27, 1912, at the age of forty-eight. In subsequent references to his commentary, he has been described as a High Churchman of the Community of the Resurrection at Mirfield.44 Commenting about speaking in tongues in Acts 2:4, he says,
“These phenomena manifesting themselves in a body of 120 must have attracted attention, and a crowd of inhabitants and pilgrims soon collected.”45
As can be seen, his perspective is that 120 initially received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.
Let’s take a quick look at G. Campbell Morgan’s perspective on this subject.
G. Campbell Morgan (1863–1945)
G. Campbell Morgan, British Evangelical Preacher, Bible Expositor, Author & Evangelist, Was One of the Most Influential Voices among English-Speaking Protestants during the late nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Born in Tetbury, Gloucestershire, Morgan’s First Sermon was preached when He was Thirteen Years Old; Ordained into the ministry of the Congregation in 1890, and Received Great Recognition on Both Sides of the Atlantic for His Clear Text-Centered Exposition. Morgan was invited by D.L. Moody to preach at Moody Bible Institute in 1896; Morgan would later be Director of Northfield Bible Conference; Morgan Would Also Receive a Degree of Doctor of Divinity From Chicago Theological Seminary in 1902; Morgan Contributed to The Fundamentals and Pastored Westminster Chapel in London From 1904-1917; Returning To Westminster Chapel In the 30’s and Remained Until Retirement in 1943. Morgan is best remembered for the Extent of His Preaching Ministry, the popularity of biblical expositional works, bringing Martyn Lloyd-Jones to Westminster Chapel, and leaving a Large Body of Work, including Sermons and Books That Established Him as One Of the Leading Evangelical Ministers of His Generation.46 He claims that
“The persons assembled, described as ‘they,’ were those named in the previous chapter, the eleven apostles… Mathias, certain women, the Virgin Mother, and the brothers of Jesus.”47
I agree, but I would like to add that all the gathered disciples are included as well.
The Lutheran scholar R. C. H. Lenski is equally concise.
R. C. H. Lenski (1864–1936)
Richard Charles Henry Lenski (R.C.H. Lenski), born in Greifenberg, Germany, on October 8, 1864, and died March 21, 1936, was an immigrant to America as a young boy. After studying theology at Capital University and being ordained in 1887, he pastored churches in Baltimore, Maryland; Trenton, N.J.; Springfield, Ohio; and Anna, Ohio. In addition to serving as a pastor, Dr. Lenski was a professor of theology at Capital University beginning in 1911 and became Dean of that institution’s school of religion. Additionally, he served as President of the Western District of the Evangelical Lutheran Joint Synod of Ohio and as Editor-in-Chief of the Die Lutherische Kirchenzeitung for nearly 20 years. Lenski is best known for authoring the most extensive work on the Christian scriptures during this time period, a twelve-volume New Testament commentary series. This series included detailed exegesis from a conservative Lutheran position, as well as an exhaustive examination of the original language of the scriptures. Dr. Lenski also authored several books related to sermon construction, including The Sermon: Its Homiletical Construction. These works placed him firmly within the realm of American Lutheran scholarship and have kept his name familiar among contemporary Protestant commentators.48 He writes on the word “All” in Acts 2:1,
“‘All’ refers to the persons mentioned in 1:12-15 and certainly includes the women …”
As the evidence above shows, in this century, most theologians believe that more than just the apostles received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. However, one theologian, John William McGarvey, disagrees with this interpretation. As a result, many, though not all, will be seen to align with McGarvey’s viewpoint in the next century. Let’s move forward to the next century.
“Clarke” Adam,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; Leslie St “phen, “Clarke” Adam,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and David M. Tho “pson, “Clarke, Adam (1760/62–1832), methodist minister and scholar,” Dictionary of Irish Biography. ↩︎
Adam Clarke, The Holy Bible … with a Commentary and Critical Notes (London, 1810–1826), on Acts 2:1. ↩︎
“The Late Rev. Jame” Ford,” in Journal of the Royal Institution of Cornwall 5 (1876–77): 320–22, whichFord’s Ford’s birth year, education at Rugby and Oriel College, Oxford degrees, ordinations, clerical appointments, principal publications, and death on February 18, 1877; see also James Ford, The Acts of the Apostles Illustrated (Chiefly in the Doctrinal and Moral Sense) from Ancient and Modern Authors (London: Joseph Masters, 1856), title page and author designation. ↩︎
James Ford, Acts of the Apostles, (London: Joseph Masters and Co., 1856), “36.↩︎
“Albert” arnes,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; Leslie St “phen, “Barnes,” lbert,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–190 “; and “Albert” arnes,” Presbyterian Historical Society, accessed March 20, 2026. ↩︎
Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Acts of the Apostles (1834), on Acts 2:4. ↩︎
Meyer, Heinrich August W” lhelm,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11t “ed.; “Heinrich August Wilhelm” Meyer,” Deutsche Biographi “; and “Heinrich August Wilhelm” Meyer,” in The Encyclopedia Americana (1920). ↩︎
“Lange, Johann” Peter,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; “Lange, Johann” Peter,” Deutsche Biographi “; and “Johann Peter” Lange,” The Canterbury Dictionary of Hymnology, accessed March 20, 2026. ↩︎
John Peter Lange, A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures: Critical, Doctrinal and Homiletical, trans. Philip Schaff, vol. 4 The Acts of the Apostles, 10 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner & Co., 1866), Acts 2:1, pg 27. ↩︎
Johann Peter Lange, Acts of the ApostlLange’sLange’s Commentary on the Holy Scriptures: Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical, on Acts 2:4 ↩︎
“Whedon, Daniel D” nAppletons’ Cyclopædia of American Biography; Abel St “vens, “Daniel Denison” hedon,” in Methodist memorial literature “; and “Daniel Denison” hedon,” Wikipedia, accessed March 20, 2026. ↩︎
Daniel WWhedon’shedon’s Commentary on the New Testament, vol. 3 (New York: Eaton & Mains, 1909), notes on Acts 2 “1. ↩︎
“Alexander, Joseph A” dison,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11t “ed.; “Alexander, Joseph A” dison,” in John McClintock and James Strong, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literatur; and “The Life of Joseph Addison Alexander” D.D.,” HathiTrust catalog record, accessed March 20, 2026. ↩︎
Joseph Addison Alexander, The Acts of the Apostles Explained (New York: Charles Scribner, 1857), on Acts 2:1; Joseph Addison Alexander, The Acts of the Apostles Explained, 3rd ed., vol. 1, 2 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner & Co, 1866), 41. ↩︎
Leslie St “phen, “Alford,” Henry,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885- 1900; “Alford, Henry,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed; and “Alford, Henry (1810–1871), dean of Canterbury and biblical scholar,” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. ↩︎
Henry Alford, The Greek Testament: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary, vol. 2 (London: Rivingtons, 1863), on Acts 2:1; Henry Alford, The Greek Testament: Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles to the Romans and Corinthians, 7th, Digitized December 16, 2010. ed., vol. 2, 4 vols. (Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co., 1877), 13. ↩︎
Notes, Critical and Explanatory, on the Acts of the Apostles identifies Melancthon W. Jacobus as the author and gives the 1869 publication details; see also the Penn and Princeton bibliographic records for Jacobus’s wider body of biblical notes and memorial materials. ↩︎
W. Jacobus Melancthon, Notes, Critical and Explanatory, on the Acts of the Apostles (New York: Robert Carter & Brothers, 1859), “9. ↩︎
“Philip Schaff,” Encyclopedia Britannica; and “Philip Schaff,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., which summarizes his Swiss birth, German education, Mercersburg and Union appointments, heresy controversy, and major historical works. ↩︎
“Sadler, Michael Ferrebee (1819- 1895),” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885 “1900; “Michael Ferrebee” adler,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; “Michael Ferrebee” Adler, Anglican History; and The Acts of the Apostles, with Notes by M. F. Sadler (1887), bibliographic record. ↩︎
Michael Ferrebee Sadler, The Acts of the Apostles: With Notes Critical and Practical (London: George Bell and Sons, 1904), 37. ↩︎
“B., “Gloag, Paton, James, in Dictionary of National Biography, Second Supplement. Gloag’s pastoral career, church leadership, and principal publications are listed; see also A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, which identifies him as the author of the 1870 Acts commentary. ↩︎
Paton J. Gloag, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, vol. 1, 2 vols. (Edinburgh: T and T Clark, 1870), 71. ↩︎
“John William McArvey,” Encyclopedia Britannica–style biographical su “mary; “John William Mc” arvey,” Christian Classics Ethereal Library author page; and W. T. “oore, “JM’Garvey’” arvey,” in The Living Pulpit of the Christian Church (1868), as indexed in Restoration Movement historical resources. ↩︎
J. W. McGarvey, Acts of the Apostles (Cincinnati, OH: Standard Publishing Company, 1892), Acts 2:1, 21. ↩︎
“Barton W. Johnson – Biography and Comm” ntary,” SwordSearcher, summarizing a late nineteenth-century biographical notJohnson’shnson’s editorial and literary work; se “also “Bible Studies at Restoration Movement” Pages,” lJohnson’shnson’s principal publications, includiPeople’seople’s New Testament (1891). ↩︎
Barton W. JohnsoPeople’seople’s New Testament with Notes (St. Louis, MO: Christian Publishing Company, 1891), on Acts 2:1–4. ↩︎
“Lindsay, Thomas Martin (1843–1914), his” orian,” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography; Lindsay, Thomas Martin, in the Dictionary of National Biography, 1927 Supplement; and Lindsay, Thomas Martin, Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon / Brill reference summary. ↩︎
Thomas M. Lindsay, The Acts of the Apostles, with Introduction, Notes, and Maps, ed. Marcus Dods and Alexander Whyte (New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1884), 48. ↩︎
T. E. Page, Carminum Liber I (London: Macmillan, 1883); Thomas Ethelbert Page, The Acts of the Apostles, Being the Greek Text as Revised by Drs. Westcott and Hort, with Explanatory Notes (London: Macmillan, 1886); T. E. Page, Bucolica et Georgica (London: Macmillan, 1898); T. E. Page, ed. The Aeneid of Virgil, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1894–1900). ↩︎
Thomas Ethelbert Page, The Acts of the Apostles, Classic Commentaries on the Greek New Testament (London: Macmillan, 1897), 84. ↩︎
Community of the Resurrection, Mirfield, commemorative notice for Richard Belward Rackham CR, which gives his birth, profession, and death dates; bibliographic records for Richard Belward Rackham, The Acts of the Apostles: An Exposition; and a later notice describing Rackham as a High Churchman from the Community of the Resurrection at Mirfield. ↩︎
Richard Belward Rackham, The Acts of the Apostles, and Exposition, 10th ed. (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1925), 17. ↩︎
Chicago Theological Seminary Library, “Life of Rev. Dr. George Campbell Morgan,” Campbell Morgan Collections, accessed March 28, 2026. Jill Morgan, A Man of the Word: Life of G. Campbell Morgan (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2010), 21–31; Fred Sanders, “Biola’s The Fundamentals Still Relevant Today,” Biola News, February 25, 2013. Chicago Theological Seminary Library, “Life of Rev. Dr. George Campbell Morgan”; Martyn Lloyd-Jones Trust, “Centenary of the Opening of Westminster Chapel: A Sermon,” accessed March 28, 2026. ↩︎
G. Campbell Morgan, The Acts of the Apostles (New York: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1924), 24. ↩︎
Erwin L. Lueker, Luther Poellot, and Paul Jackson, eds., “Lenski, Richard Charles Henry,” Christian Cyclopedia (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2000), accessed March 28, 2026; Juergen Ludwig Neve and Willard Dow Allbeck, History of the Lutheran Church in America, 3rd rev. ed. (Burlington, IA: Lutheran Literary Board, 1934), biographical notice on R. C. H. Lenski. ↩︎
“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the “Apostles-Only View” and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will continue to provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. In Part One, we investigated theologians’ insights into the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit, spanning the early church to the Reformation Era. Now, let’s enthusiastically journey into Part Two, where we will continue to uncover the fascinating perspectives of theologians on this subject through the eighteenth century!
Exploring the Historical Background (Part Two)
This section contributes to the rich historical viewpoints regarding the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. While the inquiry into who received this divine gift was notably presented by Chrysostom in the fourth century, it is intriguing to note that, to my knowledge, no theologian has argued that the Twelve Apostles were the sole recipients when the Holy Spirit descended. Let’s explore this fascinating topic further!
The Eighteenth Century(1700-1799)
We have examined the Reformation Era’s perspectives on who first received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. In this section, we will closely analyze the contributions of eighteenth-century theologians, starting with the insightful Matthew Henry.
Matthew Henry (1662-1714)
Matthew Henry, though strictly speaking lived in the 17th century, did not begin his commentary until 1704.1 He is considered an English nonconformist pastor who interpreted scripture in a commentary titled “An Exposition of the Old and New Testament,” and is among the most influential and widely read scriptural interpreters in all of Protestant History. Born at Broad Oak in Flintshire, the son of noted Pastor Philip Henry, he was raised in a strong puritan/dissenting home and later educated by the dissenting Pastor Thomas Doolittle at his academy. Matthew Henry studied law at Gray’s Inn but ultimately devoted his life almost exclusively to pastoring, serving for decades as a Presbyterian pastor at Chester, then later at Hackney. His reputation for being a powerful, devotional preacher and for applying the theological aspects of the Bible in a way that was useful to the people of God grew and spread throughout the world. The way he approached the Bible in interpreting it has had a lasting impact on Evangelicalism, Presbyterianism, Baptism, Methodism, and virtually every other form of Protestant Christianity. This is due largely to the fact that his interpretations are warm, clear, and provide insight into both the preaching of the gospel and the study of the Word of God. 2 In his commentary on Acts 2:4, Henry writes:
“It seems evident to me that not only the twelve apostles, but all the hundred and twenty disciples were filled with the Holy Ghost alike at this time.”3
He goes on:
“The “all” here must refer to the all that were together, v. 1; ch. 1:14, 15.”.4
Henry serves as a clear early eighteenth-century witness against the “Apostles Only” perspective. He explicitly identifies the recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:4 as all 120 disciples mentioned in Acts 1:14-15. As will be demonstrated later, the biblical passages on this question indicate that more than 120 disciples initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.
John Gill agrees with Henry and provides insights that will enhance our understanding of the topic.
John Gill (1697–1771)
John Gill was a prominent eighteenth-century Particular Baptist minister, theologian, and biblical interpreter. His scholarly writings established him as perhaps the most influential Baptist divine of the Eighteenth Century. Gill was born at Kettering, Northants. From early on, he demonstrated extraordinary intellectual gifts, and consequently, much of what he learned in language and theology, he learned by himself. Baptized in 1716, ordained shortly after, and entering the pastoral ministry, Gill became the Pastor of the Baptist congregation at Horsleydown, Southwark, in 1719, serving that congregation for over 50 years. Through his voluminous writing, particularly “An Exposition of the New Testament,” “A Complete Body of Doctrinal and Practical Divinity,” and his defense of Calvinistic Baptist Theology, Gill acquired a lasting reputation. Gill is remembered for marrying together an impressive pastoral ministry and an equally impressive scholarly expertise in Hebrew, theology, and biblical exposition. His influence reached well beyond Britain and America to many other Baptist and Calvinistic circles.5 In relation to Acts 2:1, Gill provides the following comments:
“Though this need not be restrained to the twelve apostles, but may be understood of the hundred and twenty.”6
On Acts 2:4, he adds:
“Not only the twelve apostles, but the seventy disciples; and it may be all the hundred and twenty, that were together, even women as well as men.”7
And in Acts 2:15, he mentions more than just the twelve.
“Meaning not only the eleven apostles, but the rest of the hundred and twenty, on whom also the Spirit was poured forth.”8
Gill stands out as a remarkable example from the eighteenth century, effectively challenging the Apostles-Only paradigm by thoughtfully including both women and men, making his perspective truly significant and enlightening.
Next, John Wesley expresses his perspective on the 120.
John Wesley (1703–1791)
John Wesley was a clergy member, evangelist, and theologian in the Church of England, most renowned as the founder of Methodism in England. Wesley was born at Epworth Rectory in Lincolnshire. He attended Charterhouse School and then Christ Church, Oxford. Wesley was ordained a deacon in 1725 and a priest in 1728. During his first years of ministry in Oxford and his ill-fated missionary adventure in Georgia, Wesley’s religious beliefs were transformed by the evangelical awakening of the time and the Aldersgate experience in 1738. Following that experience, Wesley was instrumental in the revival of religion in England during the 18th century; he traveled throughout England, preached to people from all walks of life, organized the Methodist Societies, and wrote numerous works, including sermons, journals, letters, and biblical notes. Although he never broke with the Church of England, Wesley’s theology, evangelistic fervor, and method of church organization formed the basis of the later Methodist tradition.9 Wesley shares his insights on Acts 2:1.
“They were all with one accord in one place … the whole hundred and twenty being present.”10
Wesley’s statement is much more succinct than Henry’s or Gill’s. It indicates that Acts 2:1 refers to the entire group of 120 people, not just the apostles.
Now, I invite you to explore the insightful thoughts of the Methodist theologian John Fletcher on this issue.
John Fletcher (1729-1785)
John Fletcher (1729-1785) was an Anglican clergyman, theologian, and Methodist divine who, through his writings, became the most important interpreter of Wesleyan theology in the 18th century. Fletcher was born in Nyon, Switzerland. He studied at GeneBeforer before entering Holy Orders in the Church of England in 1751. Fletcher had planned to pursue a career in the military when he moved from Geneva to England in 1750. Fletcher became both a Curate and a Vicar of the parish church in Madeley, Shropshire; however, he worked very closely with John Wesley during the evangelical revival movement. Fletcher’s renown would endure for generations through his works, including Checks to Antinomianism, in which he defended Wesleyan Arminian Theology against Calvinist opponents. Fletcher was also recognized for his piety, pastoral zeal, and theological abilities. Although Fletcher remained an ordained member of the Church of England, he would eventually become one of the most influential theological contributors to the development of early Methodism and was considered by John Wesley a possible successor.11 On this topic, Fletcher does not adhere to an Apostles-Only perspective. In fact, he writes…
“How strangely those professors deceive themselves, who confidently affirm that the Holy Spirit was promised to the apostles alone.”13
I completely agree with Fletcher on this matter.
Let’s look forward to what Thomas Coke will have to say on this point.
Thomas Coke (1747 – 1814)
Thomas Coke was a prominent figure in early Methodism, helping develop its mission work across both Britain and America. A clergyman of the Anglican Church, Methodist leader, missionary organizer, and biblical commentator, Coke was a close associate of John Wesley. He became second only to him in importance among those involved in early Methodism. Thomas Coke was born in Brecon, Wales. He attended Jesus College, Oxford University. He was ordained by the Church of England and began serving as a curate. However, as Coke’s support for Methodism continued to grow, so did the conflict he experienced. The conflict eventually led to Coke’s separation from the parish ministry. In time, Coke became one of Wesley’s inner circle and one of his most trusted advisors. Coke then became instrumental in establishing Methodism in both Britain and America. Coke is particularly noted for his leadership in Methodist missions, his repeated labors across the Atlantic Ocean, his contributions to the establishment of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and his writings. Coke wrote a comprehensive biblical commentary. Coke’s dedication to spreading Methodism, his organizational skills, and his missionary vision have made him one of the key architects of early global Methodism.14 Coke’s viewpoint is clearly evident in his summary heading for Acts 2.
“The apostles, filled with the Holy Ghost, and speaking divers languages…”15
Could this suggest that he thought only the Apostles received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost? If that quote were all he had said, it would raise some questions. While it’s true that the Apostles experienced this profound gift, were there others who also received the Holy Spirit? Coke’s ongoing discussion provides additional clarity on this intriguing topic. He poses the question:
“Why might not the Holy Spirit fall down upon all the hundred and twenty…?”16
and adds that Peter’s appeal to Joel supports the presence of
Coke’s heading appears to focus solely on the apostles, but his exposition broadens the event’s scope to include the wider audience present, specifically women. Clearly, he includes more than just the Twelve Apostles as recipients of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.
Joseph Benson, our next theologian, shares the following insights.
Joseph Benson (1749–1821)
Joseph Benson was a theologian, bible commentator, and Methodist minister; Benson would be recognized as one of the most prominent leaders of early Wesleyan Methodism following the death of John Wesley. Benson was born in Cumberland and received an education with the intention of entering the established clergy. Instead, Benson converted to Methodism at a relatively young age and shortly thereafter began receiving recognition from John Wesley for his educational contributions and preaching abilities. Benson continued to make significant contributions to the Methodist movement through his role as a preacher, apologist, editor, and conference leader. Benson made several notable contributions to theology and exegesis. Benson is best known for defending the Methodist movement, for being an Arminian, and for authoring A Commentary on the Old and New Testament.18 Benson interprets Acts 2:4 as follows:
“They were all filled with the Holy Ghost — That is, all the one hundred and twenty, as appears from Acts 2:1.”19
He continues by saying:
“This whole company was abundantly replenished with both the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit.”20
“It seems evident that not the twelve apostles only, but all the one hundred and twenty disciples were endowed with the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost at this time.”21
Benson’s perspective is valuable because he is exceptionally direct: for him, “all” in Acts 2:4 refers to all 120 people. He certainly does not, therefore, teach an Apostle-Only perspective. Although I agree that more than the apostles initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on that first Pentecost, Scripture includes more than 120 disciples. I will provide the evidence for this later in the article.
The nineteenth century sparked an engaging dialogue about the first recipients of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. This captivating conversation continued into the next century and remains relevant even today. Now, let’s eagerly investigate the fascinating developments of the nineteenth century!
Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, ed. John Brown (1852; reprint, Grand Rapids: Christian Classics, 1960), 1:3. ↩︎
Leslie Stephen, “Henry, Matthew,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, accessed March 18, 2026. ↩︎
Matthew Henry, An Exposition of the Old and New Testament (London, 1708–1710), on Acts 2:4. ↩︎
Leslie Stephen, “Gill, John,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, accessed March 18, 2026; and “Gill, John (1697–1771), Particular Baptist minister and theologian,” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. ↩︎
John Gill, An Exposition of the New Testament (London, 1746–1748), on Acts 2:1. ↩︎
“John Wesley,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, last modified February 26, 2026, accessed March 18, 2026; Leslie Stephen, “Wesley, John,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and Henry D. Rack, “Wesley [Westley], John (1703–1791), Church of England clergyman and a founder of Methodism,” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. ↩︎
John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (London, 1755), on Acts 2.:1; John Wesley, The New Testament, with Explanatory Notes, Digitized March 29, 2007. (London: Oxford University, 1869), 278. ↩︎
“John William Fletcher,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; Leslie Stephen, “Fletcher, John William,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and Encyclopedia Britannica, “John William Fletcher,” accessed March 21, 2026. ↩︎
John Fletcher, The Works of the Rev. John Fletcher, Late Vicar of Madeley, ed. John Kershaw, 8th ed., vol. VI, VII vols. (London: United Kingdom: n.. p., Digitized: November 3, 2023, 1826).193. ↩︎
“Thomas Coke,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified January 17, 2026, accessed March 18, 2026; “Coke, Thomas (1747–1814),” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and “Thomas Coke (1747–1814),” The United Methodist Church, accessed March 18, 2026. ↩︎
Thomas Coke, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (London, 1801–1803), summary on Acts 2. ↩︎
Leslie Stephen, “Benson, Joseph,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, accessed March 18, 2026; “Benson, Joseph (1749–1821; e.m. 1771),” The Encyclopedia of World Methodism / DMBI Online; and John Rylands Library, “Joseph Benson Papers,” accessed March 18, 2026. ↩︎
Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (London, 1811–1818), on Acts 2:4. ↩︎
“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the Apostles-Only View and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. The list will encompass not only early church theologians but also writers, presenters, and theologians up to the 21st century. While I intend for this list to be comprehensive, I am aware that it may not be exhaustive. If you know of any commentaries, writers, or theologians who have addressed this topic, please reach out to me. Let our theological journey begin.
Preliminary Notes
I have organized the historical quotes according to the birthdates and lifespans of the authors or theologians, rather than by the dates of their written works. I find this method a simpler way to organize the information. If you are looking for the date of a specific quotation, please refer to the detailed footnotes for accurate references. Since the main objective is to highlight the exegetical shortcomings of the Apostles-Only position and provide sound exegetical responses, each quotation supporting the Apostles-Only position will be presented with a red background and white lettering for easy reference. Quotes from other authors will support the idea that 120 disciples initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, or that more than 120 did. For example,
This study will be the most thorough examination of this question ever conducted. It will provide the foundation for a subsequent book on the same topic.
It’s important to note that the quotes highlighted in red begin in the 19th-century section. Before this period, every author unanimously agreed that more than just the twelve apostles initially received the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. Most of the theologians examined in this article believe that the 120 individuals mentioned in Acts 1 were included. Additionally, some argue that the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit may have encompassed more than just these 120, a perspective I also share. Additionally, please note that each section of this article focuses on a specific historical period. Some authors cover multiple time periods, making their categorization less straightforward than I initially anticipated. Consequently, categorizing them has involved some subjectivity. Regardless of your conclusions after exploring this subject, I wish you the best in your pursuit of understanding.
Exploring the Historical Background
The Pre-Reformation Theologians
This segment offers an engaging overview of pre-Reformation theologians and their insightful perspectives on the remarkable individuals who received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.
Cyril of Jerusalem (315-386)
Cyril of Jerusalem was a clergy member in Jerusalem, a teacher of new converts, and a theologian. His writings give insight into the faith and worship of Christians in Jerusalem during the 4th century. It is believed that Cyril was born in Jerusalem; he became a priest around mid-century. As a priest, he instructed catechumens (a teaching program that would later be called The Catechetical Lectures). At some point in 350, Cyril was appointed Bishop of Jerusalem. Most of his time as bishop was spent in conflict with other bishops over theological issues. This conflict led to his expulsion from Jerusalem at least once due to the Arian issue. He also had problems with Acacius of Caesarea. Cyril is especially remembered for saving the catechetical and mystagogical lectures. These lectures contain a wealth of information on the theology, sacraments, and devotions of the early Christian community. Cyril became a saint and Doctor of the Church, largely because of his contributions to these two areas of the faith.1 Cyril states that on the day of Pentecost, the Holy Spirit…
“descended on the Apostles in the form of fiery tongues.” 2
His statement does not clarify whether he believed that others, aside from the twelve apostles, also initially received the Holy Spirit. It only indicates that the Holy Spirit fell upon the apostles. Another theologian, Thomas Coke (1747 – 1814), wrote in one place that the Holy Spirit filled the Apostles,3 but later includes the 120 mentioned in the text as well.4 However, Cyril does not provide any further references to this comment in his other writings, leaving this quote ambiguous.
Looking ahead, it’s important to highlight that John Chrysostom thoughtfully considered the identity of his audience when he delivered his remarkable homily on Acts 2.
John Chrysostom (347-407)
John Chrysostom is considered one of the most influential of the early Greek church fathers. He was educated in the classical rhetorical tradition before entering an ascetic/ecclesiastical career. As a deacon and later as a presbyter at Antioch, John developed a reputation as one of the best preachers of the day, both for eloquence and exegetical depth, and thus earned the nickname Chrysostomos (“the golden mouth”). He was appointed bishop of Constantinople by Theodosius I in 39. While there, he made great strides in initiating moral reforms within the Church, critiquing the excesses of many clergy and emperors, and continuing his pattern of providing exposition through preaching. However, these actions put him at odds with other high-ranking clergy and officials of the empire, resulting in his removal from office and subsequent exile. During that time, John Chrysostom died in 407 A.D. He is significant in biblical studies because his works include numerous homiletic commentaries on specific texts, including Matthew, John, Acts, Romans, and the Pauline letters. These writings were written from the perspective of the Antiochene school of interpretation, emphasizing the literal and historical aspects of scripture, but also demonstrating pastoral and theological application to their readers.5 When commenting on Acts 2:4, John Chrysostom posed an interesting question. In a transcribed homily of his preaching through the book of Acts, it is recorded that when he reached Acts 2:1-2, he stated,
“Was it upon the twelve that it came?’ Was it upon the twelve that it came? Not so, but upon the hundred and twenty.” 6
The fact that Chrysostom raises this question suggests that some in his day wondered how many people received the Spirit initially on the Day of Pentecost during the fourth century. However, there are no written records by other early Church theologians discussing this topic. For the record, I understand the passages regarding this topic to teach that more than 120 disciples initially received the Holy Spirit on that wonderful first Christian Pentecost. The question of who initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost will be discussed in detail later in the article.
Augustine of Hippo may not address the question directly, yet he will reveal his interpretation of the text, prompting us to consider the implications of his insights.
Augustine of Hippo (354–430)
Augustine is one of the most influential Latin church fathers. Born at Tagaste in Roman North Africa, he studied rhetoric and experienced a period of moral & intellectual struggle — especially with Manichaeism and later Neoplatonism. After his conversion to Christianity and baptism by Ambrose in Milan in AD 387, he returned to the North. Eventually, he became bishop of Hippo in 396, where he died in 430. As a preacher, author, and theologian, Augustine was among the most important figures in Christian history. Through his works (Confessions, On the Trinity, On Christian Doctrine, The City of God), he exerted great influence over Western theology. His ideas were very significant in many areas, including grace, sin, the Church, hermeneutics, and the doctrine of God. Not only did his legacy shape late antiquity, but also medieval, Reformation, and modern Christian theology.7 Augustine first mentions the Holy Spirit descending upon one hundred and twenty people in his response to Petilian during the Donatist Controversy, where he notes,
“One hundred and twenty people had been gathered together when the Holy Spirit came upon them without the laying on of anyone’s hands.”8
He also mentions it again in one of his sermons on the Gospel of John.
“Where had the Church its commencement, but where the Holy Ghost came from heaven, and filled the hundred and twenty sitting in one place?”9
He reaffirms his viewpoint again as he preaches on Psalm 133.
“Whence those hundred and twenty … on whom when gathered into one place the Holy Spirit descended on the day of Pentecost.”10
It’s truly fascinating that he doesn’t address any questions about the original recipients of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost! This leaves us pondering whether Chrysostom’s early question was still up for discussion. However, one thing is abundantly clear: Augustine recognized that the Holy Spirit was bestowed upon more than just the twelve apostles that day, though he concurs with Chrysostom that the total number of recipients was 120. What an interesting topic to explore further!
Let us joyfully explore the insights of the esteemed Venerable Bede, who thoughtfully commented on the Acts of the Apostles, particularly aligning with Augustine on Acts 2:1–18.
Venerable Bede (672–735)
Bede the Venerable was an Anglo-Saxon monk, theologian, author of the Bible, historian, and chronicler who, through his extensive knowledge of the scripture, was one of the most important Christian scholars of the western world during the early Middle Ages. Bede lived his whole life within the monastic community, virtually at Wearmouth and Jarrow in Northumbria, where he studied the scripture from a young age. For most of his adult life, Bede dedicated himself to studying and interpreting scripture, teaching, writing, and participating in the liturgical activities of the Church. As well as being ordained as both a deacon and a priest, Bede was known for his wide-ranging scholarly abilities in areas such as the interpretation of biblical texts, historical chronology, biographies of saints (hagiography), hymns (hymnody), and the history of the Church. It is for the Ecclesiastical History of the English People (Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum) that Bede is best known, and it has been a fundamental resource for the history of Christianity among the Anglo-Saxons. In addition to this work, Bede authored many biblical commentaries, making him a central figure in the transmission of knowledge of the early Christian fathers to the Church in the Middle Ages. Due to his vast knowledge, his adherence to orthodoxy, and the ongoing impact of his writings, Bede would eventually be given the title “The Venerable” and would go on to be formally declared a Doctor of the Church.11 In Bede’s commentary on the events of the Day of Pentecost, he explains that…
“The faithful were gathered together in one place.”12
Bede comments on Acts 2, referring to the Pentecost recipients as the gathered “they” who were all together in one place, as well as “the faithful” who were united in the “upper room” when the Holy Spirit arrived. While this description is not as numerically explicit as Chrysostom’s, it still identifies those who received the Spirit at Pentecost. It appears that Bede assumed that all the disciples (the faithful) who gathered together on the Day of Pentecost received the Holy Spirit. The exact number remains unclear, suggesting he may have thought more than 120 received the Spirit when it was first poured out.
We’ve identified some theologians from the pre-Reformation era who have contributed to this topic. Let’s examine the contributions that originated during the Reformation.
Reformation Era(1500-1699)
While these dates are not officially recognized in the Reformation Era, they serve a valuable purpose for organizing information within this article. Thank you for your understanding! Let’s begin with Martin Luther.
Martin Luther (1483-1546)
Martin Luther was a German theologian who was one of the most important figures in the Protestant Reformation, primarily through his teachings and writings. Born at Eisleben, he studied the liberal arts and law and entered the Augustinian Monastery at Erfurt. In 1507, he was ordained as a Catholic priest, and later (around 1518), he was appointed Professor of Biblical Studies at the University of Wittenberg. The Ninety-Five Thesis that Luther wrote in 1517 is widely regarded as the first major step toward sparking the Protestant Reformation. As time passed, Luther’s views grew increasingly controversial. Specifically, he believed that salvation came from an individual’s faith in God, that scripture should take precedence over church authority, and that an individual’s good works were less important than their faith. Eventually, this led to great animosity toward him by both the Holy Roman Empire and the Pope, which ultimately ended in a confrontation between Luther and the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V at the Diet of Worms in 1521. Following that, Luther found protection among many of the German Princes, who sympathized with his cause. During this time, Luther continued to write, preach, translate the Bible into German, and help develop the early evangelical movement. Ultimately, Luther’s legacy has been instrumental in developing what is now known as Lutheran theology and continues to have a profound impact on Protestantism today. 13 Regarding the question of this article, Luther states that both the twelve apostles and the entire group gathered on the Day of Pentecost were filled with the Holy Spirit. In a sermon on John 14:23, Luther said that
“the Holy Spirit falls from heaven and fills all the company assembled together,”14
Though his second quote is somewhat ambiguous, Luther does include more than the original twelve apostles receiving the Gift of the Holy Spirit when he affirms that the Spirit falls and “fills all the company assembled together.” This statement suggests that he believed more than 120 people received the Holy Spirit that day, although it remains unclear to me.
What contributions can we expect from the second renowned Reformer, John Calvin, in the ongoing investigation?
John Calvin (1509–1564)
John Calvin (French Reformer and Theologian) was the central figure of the Second Generation of the Protestant Reformation Movement. Calvin was born in Noyon, Picardy; he studied Humanities and Law before dedicating himself to the Protestant Reform. After being forced into exile from France because of his Protestant beliefs, Calvin settled in Geneva and helped shape its Ecclesiastical Order and broader religious climate. Calvin’s preachings, biblical commentaries, letters, and especially his “Institutes of the Christian Religion” had an enormous impact on the theology of the Reformed Church, specifically regarding the authority of scripture, sovereignty of God, predestination, church governance, and the Christian life. As the pastor of Geneva and through his writings, Calvin was the most influential French Protestant Reformer of the sixteenth Century and among the greatest theological figures of early Modern Christianity. 16
Although the Australian Presbyterian Theologian Francis Nigel Lee suggests that John Calvin taught the Apostles-Only position,17 Calvin’s writings suggest otherwise. In the broader context of Luke’s description of those gathering in the upper room in Jerusalem (Acts 1:12-15), Calvin notes in his commentary on Acts 1:14 that the Spirit’s influence extends beyond just the twelve apostles. Interestingly, he includes the apostles’ wives as co-recipients when he writes,
“Who would, therefore, think that they were excluded from their husbands whilst they look for the coming of the Spirit?”18
In the same section of his commentary, he specifically mentions that
“the women are gathered together with them now.”19
Then Calvin points out that he understands Luke’s point, which is that everyone gathered was anticipating the Spirit’s coming, not just the twelve Apostles.
“Here [Luke] showeth that they did diligently look for the coming of the Holy Spirit, for this was the cause of their prayer, that Christ would send his Spirit, as he had promised.”20
Of particular interest is how, uniquely, Calvin includes the wives of the apostles as well as others in his theological analysis. This suggests that John Calvin held the view that the apostles were not the sole recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit during Pentecost. Those who claim otherwise are simply making unfounded assumptions without evidence to support their assertions.
What can we learn about Calvin’s protégé? It’s time to explore Theodore Beza’s perspective.
Theodore Beza (1519–1605)
The French Reformed theologian and scholar who succeeded John Calvin in Geneva was Theodore Beza. Born in Vézelay, in Burgundy he studied first in the humanities and then law with many noted humanist scholars, such as Melchior Wolmar, before experiencing a personal spiritual conversion in 1548 that led him to Geneva and Calvin, and eventually to become one of the leaders of the Reformed Movement, both academically (Professor of Greek at Lausanne) and ecclesiastically, where he served as one of the primary theological and ecclesiastical leaders in Geneva from Calvin’s death in 1564 until his own death. Beza was instrumental in establishing and defending Reformed Theology, primarily through his writing, biblical scholarship, ecclesiastical leadership, and attendance at the major Christian colloquies, particularly the Colloquy of Poissy. His greatest contributions were to Reformed Dogmatics, his editions of and annotations on the Greek New Testament, and his work as one of the chief architects of Post-Calvin Genevan Protestantism. 21
In his commentary, M. F. Sadler refers to Theodore Beza, the “Ultra-Protestant commentator,” who affirms that the gift of the Spirit is only for the Apostles, based on the context.22 However, there is no evidence supporting this statement. Sadler’s statement may be his own conclusion based upon the remarks of John Gill. John Gill, in his work An Exposition of the New Testament (London, 1746–1748), comments on Acts 2:1 that “in two ancient copies of Beza’s, and in some others, it is read as ‘all the apostles.’” This observation indicates that an extended reading was known within certain parts of the early modern textual tradition and could be used to support the Apostles-Only interpretation. While these manuscripts may exist, I do not have any primary sources to support their existence. The fact of the matter is that the commonly printed Greek text of Acts 2:1 reads ἦσαν πάντες (“they were all”).23
What can be shown with reasonable confidence is that Gill attributes to Beza the knowledge of a variant at Acts 2:1, reading “all the apostles.” Sadler seems to take Gill’s statement as an absolute fact; however, the evidence provided is insufficient. It is speculative to assert more unless these manuscripts can be located.
John Lightfoot shares his insights on the topic being investigated.
John Lightfoot (1602-1675)
John Lightfoot was an English Hebraist (Hebrew scholar), divine, and New Testament biblical interpreter who was born at Stoke-upon-Trent, and after education at Christ’s College, Cambridge, proved to be a highly skilled linguist, as well as an orator. Following ordination in the Church of England, Lightfoot served in several positions as a clergyman and was subsequently appointed as one of the best-known Christians in seventeenth-century England, providing scholarly insights into Jewish antiquity. Lightfoot took part in the Westminster Assembly; then went on to become the Master of St Catharine’s College, Cambridge, and additionally, the Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University. Lightfoot will be best remembered by the amount of knowledge that he demonstrated regarding Hebrew, rabbinic literature, and Second Temple Judaism, when applying these types of scholarly knowledge to the New Testament; Lightfoot’s work (Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae, and his Commentary on Acts) were significant contributions to the development of early modern scholarship to reconstruct the Jewish background of the Gospels and Acts, and have had a lasting effect on how people interpret scripture through biblical exegesis.24 In relation to the topic of this article, he expresses…
“That many, if not all of the 120 received the holy Ghost, and the gift of tongues on Pentecost day; and not the twelve onely.”25
He also mentions in that section,
“It being therefore not to bee denyed, that there were divers others besides the twelve, if not the whole hundred and twenty (which I rather thinke) that received the holy Ghost in the gift of tongues at this time.”26
Lightfoot’s beliefs are clear and compelling. He emphasized that a group of 120 disciples, which included the original twelve apostles, was the first to experience the profound Gift of the Holy Spirit.
Let’s examine Matthew Poole’s perspective on this matter.
Matthew Poole (1624–1679)
Poole was a theological writer from England, an English Presbyterian minister, and a nonconformist biblical commentator. He was born in York in 1624 and studied at Emmanuel College, Cambridge. After entering the ministry, Poole served as a minister at St. Michael-le-Querne in London. In 1662, Poole’s ministry came to an end due to the Act of Uniformity, which forced him out of the ministry. Even though his ministry was stopped, Poole continued to write and gain recognition for his work on the Bible. Two of his notable works were “Synopsis criticorum biblicorum” and “Annotations upon the Holy Bible”. These two works are known for their pastoral application and for drawing heavily on the writings of past interpreters. As such, Poole is often noted as one of the most important English biblical commentators of the 17th century.27 Matthew Poole, in his Annotations upon the Holy Bible (London, 1685), introduces Acts 2:1–13 with the heading,
“The descent of the Holy Ghost upon the apostles on the day of Pentecost”
Although this statement suggests that Poole believed the twelve apostles were the only ones to receive the Gift of the Holy Spirit first, the rest of his commentary does not support that view.28 He sees that the Holy Spirit is available to everyone.
The Catholic biblical scholar C. M. Du Veil holds that more than the apostles received the Holy Spirit when He was first poured out.
Charles Maria de Veil (1630-1685)
Charles Marie de Veil (also referred to as C.M. Du Veil) was a biblical scholar who wrote commentaries on the New Testament and was converted from Judaism. He studied theology in France and was well-educated before entering the Roman Catholic Church and becoming an ordained minister. De Veil earned the degree of Doctor of Divinity and served within the Roman Communion. He later became disillusioned with the Roman Communion and moved to England; there, he affiliated himself with Protestant scholars. The work for which Charles Marie de Veil is best known today is his Literal Exposition of the Acts of the Holy Apostles (1685), which illustrates his literal or philological approach to interpreting scripture. He is a significant figure for his unusual path to conversion and for his contributions to New Testament scholarship during the 17th century.29 Regarding who initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, he comments on the clause “they were all” in Acts 2:1 as follows:
“That is, those hundred and twenty, of which that most noble and most holy Colledge of Disciples of Christ at that time consisted; as is said before, c. 1. v. 15.”30
He then continues on to Acts 2:3, stating that the fiery tongues
“Visibly rested upon every one of the hundred and twenty.”31
And on Acts 2:4, he makes the point even clearer:
“The Women also who were then present in the same place.”32
Here, by including women, he shows that the Spirit’s Pentecost outpouring was not limited to only the Twelve. Du Veil’s perspective is more than just “broader than the apostles” by implication. He explicitly states that the recipients in Acts 2:1–4 were the 120 disciples, including the women who were filled with the Holy Spirit. Therefore, Du Veil serves as a clear historical witness against the Apostles-Only view, but does not clarify if more than 120 received the Spirit that Day.
For the first 1700 years, there were no theologians who supported the Apostles-Only interpretation. I look forward to exploring this intriguing topic further in Part Two—stay tuned!
“St. Cyril of Jerusalem,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified February 27, 2026, accessed March 20, 2026; J. P. Kirsch, “St. Cyril of Jerusalem,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908); and “Cyril (bishop of Jerusalem),” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed. ↩︎
Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lecture 16, sec. 4, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd ser., vol. 7, ed. Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1894). ↩︎
Thomas Coke, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (London, 1801–1803), summary on Acts 2 ↩︎
Donald Attwater, “St. John Chrysostom,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified July 26, 2025, accessed March 15, 2026. ↩︎
John Chrysostom, The Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the Acts of the Apostles, trans. J. Walker, J. Sheppard, and H. Browne, Digitized April 11, 2008., vol. 1 (United Kingdom: J. H. Parker, 1851), 54. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles, hom. 4, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st ser., vol. 11, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1889), on Acts 2:1–4. ↩︎
“St. Augustine,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified March 3, 2026, accessed March 15, 2026; Joseph Tixeront, “St. Augustine of Hippo,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 2 (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907). ↩︎
Saint Augustine, Sermons 94A–147A on the New Testament, ed. John E. Rotelle, trans. Edmund Hill, vol. 4, The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Brooklyn, NY: New City Press, 1992), 57. ↩︎
Augustine, Homilies on the First Epistle of John, hom. 2, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st ser., vol. 7, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1888). ↩︎
Augustine, Exposition on Psalm 133, sec. 2, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st ser., vol. 8, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1888). ↩︎
“Saint Bede the Venerable,” Encyclopedia Britannica, accessed March 20, 2026; G. Roger Hudleston, “The Venerable Bede,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907); and “Saint Bede summary,” Encyclopedia Britannica. ↩︎
“Acts 2 — Bible Commentaries,” SermonIndex, s.v. “Bede,” accessed April 9, 2026; Bede, A Book of Reflection on the Acts of the Apostles 2:1–18, trans. and discussed in Charles A. Sullivan, “Bede’s Book of Reflection on the Acts of the Apostles 2:1–18. . ↩︎
“Martin Luther,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified February 14, 2026, accessed March 15, 2026; Hartmann Grisar, “Martin Luther,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910). ↩︎
Martin Luther, “Sermon for Pentecost Sunday; John 14:23–31,” in The Church Postil, 1523, trans. John Nicholas Lenker, as reproduced in “Martin Luther’s Sermon for Pentecost Sunday,” accessed March 14, 2026. ↩︎
“John Calvin,” Encyclopedia Britannica, accessed March 15, 2026; J. P. Kirsch, “John Calvin,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908); see also Institutes of the Christian Religion, summarized in Encyclopedia Britannica. ↩︎
Francis Nigel Lee, “Calvinism on the Holy Spirit: John Calvin on the Constant Need to Keep on Being Filled with the Spirit” (Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Presbyterian Theological College, n.d.), accessed August 20, 2024, https://www.scribd.com/document/109894544/coths, 23. ↩︎
John Calvin, Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles, on Acts 1:14. ↩︎
“Matthew Poole,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; Leslie Stephen, “Poole, Matthew,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and “Matthew Poole,” Theopedia, accessed March 15, 2026. ↩︎
Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (London, 1685), on Acts 2:1–4. ↩︎
John McClintock and James Strong, “Duveil, Charles Maria,” in Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature; “Veil, De,” in Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature; and Charles Marie Du Veil, A Literal Explanation of the Acts of the Holy Apostles (London: Printed for Francis Pearse at the Blew, 1685). ↩︎
C. M. Du Veil,A Literal Explanation of the Acts of the Holy Apostles (London, 1685), on Acts 2:1–4; Charles-Marie Du Veil, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, trans. F. A. Cox, A Translation from the 1685 Latin Version. (London: J. Haddon, 1851), 33. ↩︎