Who Initially Received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost? A Challenge to the Apostles-Only Perspective (Part Four)

“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the “Apostles-Only View” and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will continue to provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. In Part One, we investigated theologians’ perspectives on the first recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit, spanning from the inception of the church through the Reformation Era. In Part Two, our exploration continued as we considered insights from the eighteenth century to the nineteenth century. As we move into Part Three, which covers the nineteenth century, we discover the origins of the Apostles-Only Position. Now, in Part Four, we will examine twentieth-century viewpoints about who first received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost. Let’s eagerly move on to this next chapter!

This section continues the ongoing discussion about who the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit were on the Day of Pentecost. Although John Chrysostom raised the question of who received the Holy Spirit in the fourth century, to my knowledge, there is no evidence that any theologian taught that only the Twelve Apostles received the Holy Spirit when the Spirit descended until the nineteenth century. Most of the nineteenth-century scholars we investigated concluded that 120 or more disciples received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. However, a new perspective emerged in the nineteenth century that sparked the ongoing modern controversy: the Apostles-Only position.

As we explore the twentieth century, the diverse theological perspectives on our original topic come into focus. Let’s eagerly embark on this journey, beginning with E. M. Zerr!

E. M. Zerr — also known as Edward Michael Zerr — was born in Strasburg, Illinois. As a child, he lived in Missouri. At 17, he was baptized. During the late 1800s, he became involved in some local church work. For many years, Zerr conducted “Bible Readings” for churches of Christ throughout this country; he wrote articles for Christian journals and spent over 7 years writing his bible commentary. His most lasting contributions have been through his verse-by-verse study of the entire Bible, along with several hymns and smaller doctrinal studies. His influence has endured even after his passing on February 22, 1960.1 In his commentary on Acts 1:5, Zerr posits that…

Is it true that all pronouns automatically refer back to the last noun mentioned? Zerr suggests that Luke must be following the common Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement rule, which states that a pronoun should refer directly back to the last noun or noun phrase, known as its antecedent. Is this an absolute rule in English or Greek grammar? Do Luke and the other authors of the New Testament prove this to be true? These questions will be explored in detail later in this article. More importantly, even if this rule is being practiced, does it provide sufficient evidence to support the apostles-only paradigm? From my perspective, the evidence still does not support it.

Our next theologian, Thomas Walker, disagrees with Zerr’s interpretation of these passages and supports a more traditional understanding of the texts relevant to this issue.

The 20th-century Christian Biblical Writer/Commentator Thomas Walker (1881-1950) demonstrated a continuing interest in NT Interpretation, particularly in Acts and the Gospels, through his published writings. In theological bibliography, he is listed as the author of “The Acts of the Apostles” in the “Indian Church Commentaries Series,” Madras, 1910; and “Is Not This the Son of Joseph?”, A Study of the Infancy Narratives, London, 1937. The two works indicate that Walker was writing for both an ecclesiastical and educational audience by combining Exegetical Exposition with Historical/Jewish Background. Thomas Walker was a 20th-century Biblical Commentator who produced written commentaries/expositions concerning the NT, and is best known for these contributions.4 In his commentary on Acts 1:15, he writes:

“This verse shews very clearly that the Pentecostal baptism was by no means confined to the apostles. A considerable number of others, both men and women, shared it with them.”5

Additionally, he highlights the same point in Acts 2:1. The term “all” refers to…

“All the disciples assembled in Jerusalem (1:15), men and women, and not the apostles only. Notice the frequent reiteration of the word in this chapter (vv. 4, 7, 12, 14, 17, 21, 32, 36, 39, 43, 44, 45).”6

He holds a broader perspective beyond the apostles-only view, but doesn’t specify whether the total includes the 120 or more who initially received the Holy Spirit.

James Coffman, a Restorationist, offers further insights into the belief that only the apostles originally received the Gift of the Holy Spirit.

James Burton Coffman was a pastor/teacher/commentator in the Churches of Christ who had a long preaching career and an enormous commentary project, which earned him recognition as one of the most prominent Restoration Movement Bible Expositors of the twentieth century. In 1927, Coffman earned his Bachelor’s degree in History and Music from Abilene Christian University. Before becoming a full-time preacher in 1930, Coffman worked in education. Over more than 60 years of ministry, he preached regularly in congregations across Texas, Oklahoma, Washington, D.C., and New York City. He also led hundreds of Gospel Meetings. He is best remembered for leading churches in both Houston and Manhattan. Following retirement in 1971, he dedicated the remainder of his life to completing his commentary series on the complete Bible, which consisted of 37 volumes. The commentaries were completed by 1992 and are now published through ACU Press, but have been available for many years via online academic platforms. Today, these remain popular resources among conservative Churches of Christ Bible Study.7 Coffman presented a compelling argument that only the twelve apostles initially received the Holy Spirit.

While Coffman’s arguments are compelling, they lack important information, giving the impression that the argument is settled when, in reality, it relies on selective evidence. It leans heavily on one antecedent argument, overstates the exclusivity of the promise, treats Acts 2:32 as a controlling key when it may not be, confuses apostolic-office criteria with resurrection witness more broadly, and does not do full justice to Luke’s emphasis on the larger praying community or to Peter’s Joel citation about sons, daughters, and both male and female servants. I will explain this in great detail later.

Interestingly, Jacques Dupont, a Catholic exegete and Benedictine monk, supports a position similar to that of Coffman, Zerr, and McGarvey.

The work of Belgian Benedictine monk Jacques Dupont, Roman Catholic exegete and New Testament scholar, made him one of the most important twentieth-century interpreters of both the Synoptic tradition and the book of Acts/Luke. A monk at Saint-André de Clerlande in Belgium, he obtained his doctorate in theology from Louvain University in 1946. His major scholarly contribution was becoming one of the leading specialists in the Acts of the Apostles. In addition, Dupont participated in the preparation of the Bible de Jérusalem and authored numerous studies on the Beatitudes, the speeches in Acts, and the theological significance of the Gentile mission. Dupont’s contribution to biblical scholarship will be remembered for demonstrating how a deep concern for theological interpretation can be combined with a strong commitment to close, careful textual and literary analysis. One of the first notable modern discussions of the salvation of the Gentiles in Acts/Luke that provided this model was Dupont’s study “Le Salut des Gentils et la signification théologique du livre des Actes.”9 In this document, he mentions that…

Here, he clearly states that the promise of the Spirit was addressed solely to the apostles. Can this withstand exegetical scrutiny? No, it cannot.

Going forward, the Restorationist minister, Donald F. DeWelt, expresses a viewpoint that is similar to Dupont’s.

Donald F. DeWelt was an influential American Restoration Movement pastor, teacher, publisher, and Bible commentator who had an impact on mid-20th-century independent Christian Church and Church of Christ denominations. From 1957 until 1985, he taught at Ozark Bible College. He began publishing College Press in 1959 and developed a national reputation with the Bible Study Textbook series and other works, including Acts Made Actual and The Power of the Holy Spirit. Later accounts by those familiar with him describe him as particularly remembered for his role as a Bible teacher, writer/publisher, and leader in Christian higher education through classroom teaching, printing ministries, and academic leadership.11 In his work Acts Made Actual, he explains that

This argument appears to be the most compelling evidence for the apostles-only perspective among its supporters. However, from this author’s viewpoint, it not only overlooks the broader understanding of the pronoun-antecedent grammar rule but also violates several principles of hermeneutics. We will explore this issue in detail in some future segments.

Now, let’s evaluate what Roy E. Gingrich taught on this topic.

The work of Roy E. Gingrich was that of a well-known Evangelical Pastor, Professor of Bible at several Bible Colleges, and Author who wrote over 100 “Outline” Commentaries on the Bible. Mr. Gingrich was born in Ozark, Illinois, and received a call into the Christian Ministry in 1941. He served as a Pastor in Mount Vernon, IL, then in Indianapolis, IN, before becoming the long-time Pastor of Faith Bible Church in Memphis, TN. It appears from other sources related to his writings that he earned his degree, magna cum laude, in 1963 from Crichton College and shortly thereafter began teaching there. He would serve as Pastor of Faith Bible Church in Memphis for nearly 40 years, while also serving as a Professor of Bible at Crichton College in Memphis. His most notable contributions were hundreds of books of commentary, including surveys and theological studies such as The New Testament Survey and Introduction to Theology. These works were written directly and concisely, using an outline format for Pastors, Teachers, and serious lay readers. As a result of serving as a Pastor for many years, teaching in a classroom setting, and writing extensively, Gingrich has become a recognized conservative dispensationalist voice in popular Bible Exposition.13 In his work, The Book of Acts, he discusses Acts 2:1 and writes about its significance.

“The disciples (the 120 spoken of in 1:15) were gathered with one accord in one place (probably in the upper room mentioned in 1:13) on the Day of Pentecost.”14

While I agree with the viewpoint that does not support the apostles’ only perspective, I understand Scripture to show that more than 120 initially received the Spirit on Pentecost.

Let’s see what Albert Garner has to say.

Albert Garner was a well-known Missionary Baptist minister, theologian, writer, and educator who became a significant figure within the Landmark and Missionary Baptist movements in America from the mid-twentieth century until his death. Born to John and Alice (née Wilson) Garner in Cross County, AR, on Aug. 1, 1920, Garner received his Christian education within the Missionary Baptist Church. Garner’s identity emerged through his work as a pastor, through public theological debate, and through an impressive output of written materials. According to various Arkansas histories, he was among the first graduates of Missionary Baptist Seminary and also founded Florida Baptist Schools. In addition to being identified as a notable participant in public debates, holding to a more conservative Baptist stand. In addition to writing the multivolume Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary, he is most remembered for his role as a teacher, debater, and representative of conservative Baptist denominations.15 In his commentary, Garner explains who was to receive the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

“‘But you all will be baptized in (the) Holy Spirit;’ both with and in the Holy Spirit. This points to the overwhelming, empowering, immersing with and in the Holy Spirit of promise that came on Pentecost, as prophesied and promised, by John the Baptist and by Jesus, Matthew 3:11; Luke 3:16; Luke 24:49; John 14:16-17. The ‘ye’ refers not to the Apostles restrictedly, but to the church as an Institution that was baptized, immersed, endued once for all, for her world-wide and age-long work, beginning at Jerusalem.”16

Albert Garner is the first to articulate the “Institutional” argument. If this argument were the only explanation for the events of the Day of Pentecost, there would be little reason for Luke to recount instances of individuals receiving the Holy Spirit in other passages of the Book of Acts, as that would be redundant. A more refined perspective suggests that while the Holy Spirit descended upon the first gathering of the Church, it does not mean that every person who joins the Church automatically receives the Holy Spirit. Instead, this initial event indicates that the Holy Spirit is now available to all members of the Church. Just as the first disciples had to wait to receive the Gift of the Holy Spirit, so do all others. Therefore, this gift should not be understood as a one-time occurrence for the Church, but rather as a free gift that is accessible to individual believers in every generation since Pentecost.

Our next theologian, John Stott, is well-known in Evangelical circles. Let’s explore his perspective.

John R. W. Stott was an Anglican pastor, evangelist, theologian, and writer who was one of the most important voices for modern-day global evangelicalism through his writings, sermons, and organizational leadership throughout the last century. John R. W. Stott was born in England, educated at Rugby School and Trinity College, Cambridge; Ridley Hall, Cambridge; and was ordained as a deacon in 1945. He served as the Assistant Curate at All Souls, Langham Place in London from 1945-50, and then as the rector from 1950-75. After serving as rector, Stott continued as the rector emeritus at All Souls, Langham Place until his death. In addition to his local parish ministry, John R. W. Stott emerged as a prominent figure in international evangelicalism by establishing Langham Partnership and by helping draft and organize the 1974 Lausanne Congress. At this congress, he led the drafting committee for the Lausanne Covenant and is frequently referred to as its primary architect. John R. W. Stott wrote over 50 books on Christian theology and practice, such as Basic Christianity and The Cross of Christ. Through his roles as preacher, teacher/expositor, and statesman, John R. W. Stott established himself as one of the leaders of contemporary evangelicalism, a figure who will continue to be heard across both academic institutions and churches.17 John Stott succinctly speaks against the Apostles-Only position here:

“For they must not imagine that the Pentecostal gift was for the apostles alone, or for the 120 disciples who had waited ten days for the Spirit to come, or for any élitist group, or even for that nation or that generation alone. God had placed no such limitations on his offer and gift.”18

I wholeheartedly agree with John Stott’s insightful observation that the Holy Spirit’s gift extends beyond the apostles’ generation. It’s truly inspiring to recognize this ongoing blessing! Yes, indeed, let us celebrate this profound truth together!

Our next theologian is well known within Evangelicalism as well and may be the first evangelical to advocate the apostles-only position – Norman Geisler. Until now, most teachers of the apostles-only paradigm have come from the Restorationist theological stream.

Joe Jackson Hisle was an evangelist in the Church of Christ, a preacher and author of sermons, and a Bible commentator. His public service focused primarily on congregational preaching and gospel meetings rather than on holding a formal professorship. He grew up in Allen, Oklahoma, attended school in Ada, graduated from high school there, studied for three years at East Central College, was drafted into the U.S. Army Air Corps during WWII, and ran his brother’s equipment company. For over thirty years, he had remained a long-time member of the church where he attended college. Among other things, within restoration movement circles, he is well known for a commentary on the Acts of the Apostles that he authored in 2002 and published by Contending for the Faith Publications, as well as for the sermon collection Let No Man Despise Thy Youth. The publisher refers to him as one of the most sought-after gospel-meeting evangelists in the United States and as having preached the gospel for nearly 50 years. His sermons are still widely available today on archived pages of the church where he studied, as well as on Let the Bible Speak.19 In reference to the “they” mentioned in Acts 2:1, he wrote,

The issue of whether all pronouns refer back to the last-mentioned noun is a key point for advocates of Apostles-Only belief. Again, is this an absolute rule in English or Greek grammar? Do Luke and the other authors of the New Testament support this claim? These questions will be explored in detail later in this article.

In the notes on Acts 1:8, he states…

Hisle presents a pronoun-antecedent argument that initially seems strong. In this article, we will conduct a thorough analysis of this argument to ensure readers are not misled again. For now, let’s proceed with the historical material.

Our next theologian, Jay E. Adams, the originator of nousthetic counseling, addresses the recipients of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.

Jay E. Adams was an American Reformed theologian, minister, seminary professor, and author, best known as the originator of nouthetic counseling. Nouthetic counseling is a type of Pastoral Care based on the idea that Scripture is sufficient for all things in life, unlike many other forms of counseling, which are grounded in secular psychological theories. E. Adams was born in Baltimore, MD. While teaching homiletics, pastoral theology, and biblical counseling at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, he would go on to help develop the Doctor of Ministry in Homiletics program at Westminster Theological Seminary in California. He co-founded several organizations, including the Christian Counseling & Education Foundation (CCEF), the National Association of Nouthetic Counselors (NANC, now known as the Association of Certified Biblical Counselors or ACBC), and the Institute for Nouthetic Studies. In 1970, he wrote “Competent to Counsel,” which has been widely regarded as the primary source that began the modern biblical counseling movement. Throughout the remainder of his ministry, he wrote over 100 books on counseling, preaching, theology, and living as a Christian.22

“The tongues of fire were the sign of the power with which [the Spirit’s descent was enduing them]. This was the reception of the power mentioned in 1:8. The filling of the Spirit was universal; all 120 received it.”23

I agree with him that the filling of the Spirit was universal. It was not just for the Apostles.

Our next theologian is well known and may be the first evangelical to advocate the apostles-only position: Norman Geisler. Until now, most advocates have come from the Restorationist theological camp.

Norman L. Geisler was a renowned American evangelistic theologian, philosopher, apologist, and educator who was the most productive and influential defender of biblically based classical Christian apologeticism and conservative Protestant advocacy of inerrant scripture from the late twentieth century through the early twenty-first century. Geisler was born on July 21, 1932, in Warren, Michigan. He studied theology and philosophy at Wheaton College and William Tyndale College and earned his PhD from Loyola University Chicago. Throughout his career, Geisler taught at several institutions, including Detroit Bible College, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Trinity College, and Dallas Theological Seminary; he also co-founded both Southern Evangelical Seminary and Veritas Evangelical Seminary. He is perhaps best known for defending Christianity’s fundamental tenets, which include theism, the historic Christian faith, and the complete authority of scripture through publications such as Christian Apologetics, Systematic Theology, and I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist (co-authored with Frank Turek); additionally, he was instrumental in drafting the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. As a teacher, debater, and author of numerous books, Geisler has had a profound impact on evangelical theology, apologetics, and conservative exegesis.24 For our purposes, we refer to what he wrote in appendix one, titled “Only the Apostles Spoke in Tongues at Pentecost,” of his Systematic Theology. He states that…

I was quite surprised when I read his article about presenting his case for the apostles-only position. From my perspective, he completely overlooks standard exegetical and hermeneutical principles. His points are easily addressed, and I plan to respond to them in detail—leaving no stone unturned in future exegetical segments of this article.

For the first time in history, a Calvinist has a positive view of the apostles’ only position. Let’s explore what Presbyterian theologian Francis Nigel Lee suggests.

Francis Nigel Lee was a British-born minister, theologian, teacher, and writer who wrote on the subjects of Theology, Philosophy, Church History, Apologetics, and Eschatology. Lee was born in Kendal, Westmorland, in 1934. At a young age, he moved to South Africa and received his education there. Lee became a Protestant Christian in 1957. After completing degrees at the University of Cape Town, the University of Stellenbosch, and the University of the Free State, he worked in South Africa, the USA, and Australia in pastoral, academic, and editing capacities. He was primarily recognized for his involvement in Confessional Reformed Theology, Historicist Eschatology, and Postmillennialism, as well as for publishing and/or writing an enormous number of works, both published and unpublished. Sources for the Archives and Obituaries report that Lee served in the Presbyterian Church in America, taught at multiple educational institutions, and worked in Queensland, where he exerted significant influence on Conservative Reformed circles.26

Although his position is not discussed in depth, it seems to have opened the door for those who adhere to the apostles-only position, particularly in the Calvinistic camp.

The next theologian to join this discussion is the Scottish theologian I. Howard Marshall.

Howard Marshall was a Scottish New Testament Scholar. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential evangelical scholars of the latter half of the 20th Century in the interpretation of the New Testament. Marshall’s education took place at Cambridge University and at the University of Aberdeen. Following this, he worked as a lecturer in New Testament at Aberdeen from 1964 until 1999, when he retired. After retiring, Marshall received two professorial appointments: Emeritus Professor of New Testament Exegesis and Honorary Research Professor. Marshall concentrated his scholarly endeavors primarily around three areas: Luke-Acts, the Pastorals, and New Testament Theology. In addition to these specific areas, Marshall also provided broad academic leadership through involvement as Chair of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical and Theological Research; President of the British New Testament Society; and Chairman of the Fellowship of European Evangelical Theologians. Marshall achieved prominence within academia and the Church through major publications, including The Gospel of Luke, Acts, Luke: Historian and Theologian, and New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel.28 In reference to the “all” in Acts 2:1, he states

“The whole company of 120 people is doubtless meant, and not just the reconstituted twelve apostles.”29

Next, we have another advocate for the apostles-only paradigm: Richard H. Snell.

Richard H. Snell was an internet writer and Bible teacher for the Church of Christ, with articles on the Lexington Church of Christ website. The articles included “Who Were Baptized In The Holy Spirit On The Day Of Pentecost?” and “The Veil of the Tabernacle and the Great Controversy as Taught by E. G. White and the Seventh Day Adventists.” Those articles show Snell to be a conservative restorationist author writing on topics such as biblical exposition, doctrinal controversy, and close argument from scripture. He is a well-known twentieth-century religious writer in the Church of Christ who wrote apologetic and exegetical essays to defend the faith and explain doctrine, rather than being known for a large public profile in academia or church government.30 While he has written extensively on this topic, other theologians have presented similar arguments previously. So, I will focus on his claim that only the apostles were promised the Holy Spirit here. He posits that

While it is likely that the future apostles were present in the audience of John the Baptizer, this does not imply that they were the only ones to whom John directed his message. Adding to his thoughts, he writes…

Let’s consider an important question: Does Acts one encompass the entire narrative of Scripture for this period? If not, could it be that selective passages are being chosen to support a preconceived idea? As we’ll explore, this viewpoint seems to contrast sharply with the clear teachings of the New Testament.

Carl A. Allen, another Restorationist, conveys the same teachings as Snell.

Carl A. Allen, a Churches of Christ evangelist, writer, and Bible teacher, has developed his public ministry through speaking, debating, and conservative, expositional biblical teaching. He was raised in Ada, Oklahoma; baptized into the church in 1959; completed high school at Ada High School in 1966; received a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Sociology from East Central University in 1970; and was ordained to the office of Evangelist in 1970 by the Church of Christ in Ada. As an Evangelist, Mr. Allen has been involved in gospel meeting work throughout much of his career; he has frequently participated in Preacher Studies and has written articles on various doctrines and exegesis for publications such as Truth Magazine, LaVista Church of Christ, and other outlets of the Restoration Movement. From his writings made available to the general public, he continues to address areas of controversy, such as baptism by the Holy Ghost, the nature of doctrine, preterism, marriage, and related topics, making him a recognized voice among conservative teachers in Churches of Christ.33 Carl Allen contends that

I have previously addressed the pronoun-antecedent argument in a mild manner. The details will be coming soon. He continues to express his thoughts.

He further contends,

These arguments are quite similar. Readers will later appreciate a more in-depth answer regarding this point. A significant aspect of Carl A. Allen’s exegetical issue is his neglect of the full context, particularly in Luke 24.

Let’s explore Richard B. Gaffin’s insights on the topic, drawing from his perspective as a Reformed scholar.

Richard B. Gaffin Jr. is a prominent Reformed theologian who serves as an Orthodox Presbyterian pastor and professor emeritus. His contributions have helped establish him as a leading representative of Westminster biblical theology since the late 20th century and into the 21st century. As a child of Orthodox Presbyterian missionaries in Peiping (now Beijing), China, Gaffin grew up and attended college at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, MI. After that, he received his Master of Divinity (M.Div.) degree from Westminster Theological Seminary. He then went to Germany, where he received his Ph.D. from the University of Göttingen. Gaffin became a member of the faculty at Westminster Theological Seminary in 1965, after which he taught for many years, ultimately taking the Charles Krahe Chair of Biblical and Systematic Theology. He currently holds the title Professor Emeritus of Biblical and Systematic Theology.37 Richard Gavin asserts that,

As those quoted earlier do, the apostles-only advocates make the pronoun-antecedent argument a key focus. While it initially appears that Richard Gaffin is employing the context principle to bolster his stance, a comprehensive examination will ultimately reveal its limitations. I look forward to sharing further insights that will clarify this perspective and highlight the need for a more robust argument.

Wayne Jackson, another Restorationist, agrees with Richard Gaffin.

Wayne Jackson, Churches of Christ preacher, apologist, and author/editor, who influenced many in conservative restoration movement circles through the pulpits, publications & writings on biblical apologetics. The public biography indicates he was born in Goodlettsville, Tennessee; worked at the church in Delta, CO; then preached at the East Main Street congregation in Stockton, CA from 1961. According to these same sources, he received an AA degree from Stockton College, a BA from Sacramento Baptist College, and an MA from the Alabama Christian School of Religion. Additionally, Jackson co-founded and served as long-time editor of the Christian Courier. Beginning publication in May 1965. He authored over thirty books on biblical/apologetic/theological subjects, as well as on numerous other topics such as science/creation, prophecy/government, and Acts. In this manner, both by working in a local congregation and by publishing consistently, Jackson has become one of the best-known authors/ministers within churches, with his writing and views spreading far beyond his individual congregation.39

All evidence considered, no, the first application of the prophecy was not just for the apostles alone; it was applied to all the disciples and followers of Christ who were gathered together, waiting and praying for the Gift of the Holy Spirit. This fact will be proven conclusively in a future segment.

The next theologian takes a position diametrically opposed to Wayne Jackson’s views.

John B. Polhill is a Baptist New Testament scholar who has taught for many years. His scholarly contributions to the fields of Luke-Acts and Paul have had a considerable impact. Mr. Polhill received his Bachelor’s degree from the University of Richmond and both Master of Divinity and Doctor of Philosophy degrees from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He also attended other graduate schools, including Harvard Divinity School, the University of St. Andrews, Princeton Theological Seminary, and the University of California-Berkeley. He began teaching at Southern Seminary in 1969 and was appointed to the James Buchanan Harrison Chair of New Testament Interpretation. At Southern, he also became Senior Professor of New Testament Interpretation. Dr. Polhill is most well-known nationally for his Acts commentary (New American Commentary) and his book on Paul and His Letters. In addition to these two books, Dr. Polhill has written or edited several reference materials, contributed to denominational publications, and authored numerous articles. As an active participant in both the Society of Biblical Literature and the National Association of Baptist Professors of Religion, Dr. Polhill has practiced what he teaches by serving as a senior pastor for churches in Virginia, Kentucky, and Massachusetts throughout his career.41 He explains his view on this question quite clearly,

“Who were the people gathered in the upper room? On whom did the Spirit descend? Was it the 120 mentioned in 1:15 or only the Twelve Apostles? In 2:14 Luke mentioned only the Twelve, but there it probably was to connect them with Peter’s speech, which appealed to their special role as eyewitnesses to the resurrection (2:32). The presence of the large crowd testifying to the witness of the Spirit-filled Christians (2:6–11) would indicate that the full 120 were involved, as would the text Peter quoted from Joel that refers to women as well as men prophesying (2:17–18)… Perhaps the clearest indication that the entire 120 received the Spirit at Pentecost is Joel’s inclusion of daughters as well as sons—all were prophesying. Joel undoubtedly had seen the Spirit’s outpouring only as a gift to Israel, and perhaps many of those Jewish-Christians at Pentecost saw it the same way. The remainder of Acts clarifies that the promise applies to the Gentiles as well: it is indeed poured out on ‘all people.'”42

I agree with John Polhill that the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit included more than just the apostles.

Ron Graham expresses his viewpoint, which aligns with Wayne Jackson’s.

Ron Graham is a preacher/teacher/writer for the Churches of Christ; best known as the preacher and webmaster for simplybible.com (also referred to on the website as “Simply Christians Australia”). In addition to describing his role as the author/webmaster, Graham provides information about his ministry in his bio section on the author’s page. He indicates he has been serving for approximately sixty years. Additionally, he states that he became a Christian at a very young age and began preaching by age nineteen. Moreover, he explains that the initial seven years of support were provided to him by the 11th and Birdwell Church of Christ in Big Spring, Texas. Further, the author’s page portrays Graham’s ministry as a combination of both supported preaching and secular employment. Finally, it identifies Graham’s ministry primarily within Australian Churches of Christ, with publications, video-teaching, missionary service in Vanuatu, and pulpit service at the Bundaberg church of Christ. According to Graham, he retired from pulpit service in May 2017 to focus all his time on developing simplybible.com. Graham stated that simplybible.com currently includes over 1,600 Bible study pages and has archived decades of his teachings. As such, his body of published works include: verse-by-verse studies on Acts and topical studies on subjects such as the Holy Spirit, the church, prophecy and Christian living; therefore, he can be most appropriately defined as a church based Bible teacher/study writer who has disseminated his influence via preaching, multiple distributed teaching ministries and an extensive independent online resource for students rather than via traditional academic appointments.43

This is nothing new to this investigation. My thoughts are clear on the matter.

Windell Gann, a minister of the Church of Christ, supports the apostles-only position.

Windell Gann is a Bible teacher and a Churches of Christ minister whose mission work has focused on congregational preaching, classroom study, and the production of study materials for Sunday school classes and individual readers. Public information from rogersville church of Christ indicates that he served more than forty years as a pulpit minister to various Sunday schools in Ohio and Alabama; served as the pulpit minister at rogersville church of Christ since 1986; retired from his position at rogersville church of Christ in 2006, but continues to teach bible classes and serve when needed. Information from Rogersville also shows that Gann holds several degrees in biblical studies and has a background in religious education. Windell Gann is also known for providing a substantial amount of free bible study materials, including sermon outlines, bible study lesson sheets, “Walking Through the Bible” resources, PowerPoint sermons, and a verse-by-verse commentary covering Acts through Revelation, which have been available on his website, the resource section of the Rogersville congregation’s website, and StudyLight. A historical account of the Fairfield/Faulkner area of Fairfield Township, Fayette County, Ohio, also notes that he began his preaching work there in 1961, following his graduation from Freed-Hamman College (and his marriage to Mary Ann) in 1963. Together, these sources present Gann as a practical Restoration Movement bible study teacher whose influence will come not so much through formal academic publications but rather through durable church-based bible study tools and commentary.45 According to Windell Gann,

This is the same main argument presented by all advocates of the apostles-only perspective.

Next, we will explore the brief comment Professor Grant Osborne has to say about this topic.

Grant R. Osborne, an American evangelical New Testament scholar, made important contributions to the study of biblical hermeneutics, the Gospels, Revelation, and evangelical commentary. Osborne attended Fort Wayne Bible College, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and the University of Aberdeen. There, Osborne completed his PhD. For many years, he taught at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. As such, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School remembers him as one of its professors. His most notable works are The Hermeneutical Spiral, a widely read book on interpreting Scripture that won the 1993 Christianity Today Critics’ Choice Award, and commentaries on Matthew, Revelation, Romans, 1-3 John, and Hebrews. In addition, Osborne worked with Tyndale’s Bible Translation Committee on the New Living Translation, serving as the senior translator for the Gospels and Acts; this provides further evidence of his scholarly stature. Further proof of his scholarly stature can be found in the 2013 festschrift, On the Writing of New Testament Commentaries. 47

Finally, the promised day (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4) arrives, and the saints (the 120 of 1:15) are still gathered in the upper room awaiting the expected event.48

He suggests that more than the apostles were awaiting the promised Holy Spirit, indicating that he believes additional individuals, beyond just the twelve apostles, received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.

Biblical scholar Lee McDonald concurs.

Lee Martin McDonald is an American New Testament scholar whose research on early Christianity and its role in the development of canonical authority and the canonization process has significantly impacted the study of early Christianity and canon formation. Lee M. McDonald received a Ph.D. in New Testament studies from the University of Edinburgh (1976) and later earned a Th.M. from Harvard University. Over the years, Lee McDonald served as President Emeritus and Professor of New Testament Studies at Acadia Divinity College, as Dean of the Faculty of Theology at Acadia University, and as past president of the Institute for Biblical Research. In addition to these positions, Lee McDonald has taught or lectured at many other schools, including Fuller Theological Seminary, Princeton Theological Seminary, and Sioux Falls Seminary. His most notable contributions are through his writing, which include, but are not limited to, The Formation of the Christian Biblical Canon, The Canon Debate, The Origin of the Bible, and Before There Was a Bible. Recent author profiles describe him as having authored or edited more than 30 books with around 160 articles/essays. This extensive scholarship has helped make him one of the most recognized evangelical voices on the origins and formation of the biblical canon.49 Pointing out what is written in Acts 2:1, he writes,

The “all” refers to the whole assembly of 120 rather than only to the Twelve (1:15), and the Holy Spirit came upon all of them.50

I believe that “all” refers to all the disciples of Christ who were gathered, waiting for the promised Holy Spirit.

Next is David Peterson, who also holds the same view as Lee McDonald.

David G. Peterson is a theologian who specializes in New Testament studies. He is also an ordained Anglican priest. His research has had a significant influence on the study of Luke-Acts, the book of Hebrews, the theology of St. Paul, the doctrine of Christian holiness (or sanctification), and the biblical theology of worship. Dr. Peterson was an emeritus professor at Moore Theological College in Sydney and still occasionally teaches there. Moore indicates that Dr. Peterson holds the degrees ThL, BA, MA (Sydney), BD (London), ThSchol, and PhD (Manchester). Dr. Peterson was Principal of Oak Hill College in London from 1996 through 2007. His Profile indicates that he has engaged in pastoral ministry in the Dioceses of Sydney, Chester, and London. Dr. Peterson’s most notable scholarly contributions are: The Acts of the Apostles in the Pillars New Testament Commentary Series; Romans in the New Testament. David Peterson shares Lee McDonald’s view. Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary Series: Engaging With God, Possessed By God, Transformed By God, and Hebrews and Perfection. By combining the roles of institutional leader, ordained pastor, and prolific author, Dr. Peterson has established himself as one of the most well-known and respected evangelical scholars, whose scholarship demonstrates both careful attention to detail in textual analysis and a connection to the broader theological concerns of the Church. 51

Despite the prominence of the Twelve in the preceding chapter, it is likely that those gathered together included the 120 disciples mentioned in 1:15.”52

Again, my conviction is that a clear exegetical analysis of the text supports that “all” refers to all the disciples of Christ who were gathered, waiting for the promised Holy Spirit.

Ben Witherington III shares the same perspective on this issue.

Ben Witherington III is a New Testament scholar who has had a major impact in the study of the historical Jesus, Paul’s writings, and the field of socio-rhetorical exegesis. Dr. Witherington graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (BA), Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (MDiv.), and the University of Durham (PhD., 1981; emphasis was in New Testament Theology) under C.K. Barrett. His teaching experience includes time at High Point College, Duke Divinity School, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, and Ashland Theological Seminary, and he has served as the Jean R. Amos Professor of New Testament for Doctoral Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary since 1995. Dr. Witherington has authored over sixty books. He has authored commentaries for every book in the New Testament. Books like The Jesus Quest and The Paul Quest have established Dr. Witherington as an authority in providing the scholarly community with historically informed, literarily interpreted, and theologically relevant interpretations of scripture that are easily understood by both scholars and those reading in churches.53 He rightly says

“There is no indication that this phenomenon was only experienced by the Twelve as some sort of empowerment for leadership. To the contrary, what follows in Peter’s speech suggests the Spirit empowers the witness of all God’s people, including those of lowest social status. All in the room were filled with the Spirit and began to speak in ‘other tongues’ as the Spirit gave them utterance.”54

In my opinion, Ben Witherington is entirely correct.

In agreement with Geisler, Gaffin, and Snell, another Restorationist, Dave Mille, supports their viewpoint.

Dave Miller (born 1953) is an apologist, author, and Bible teacher for the Churches of Christ who has been influential among conservative Restoration Movement thinkers regarding evidentialism in Christianity, authority of Scripture, church identity, and contemporary morality. From his Apologetics Press page, it appears that Mr. Miller obtained degrees at the following institutions: Lubbock Christian University, Texas Tech University, Harding School of Theology, and Southern Illinois University (where he earned his doctorate in rhetoric and public address). The same source(s) note that Mr. Miller has worked on a full-time basis for Apologetics Press since 2002, with 18 years as Executive Director from 2005 through 2023. Following his retirement from this position, he remained employed by the organization as a staff writer and consultant. Mr. Miller has authored many booklets, study guides, and other works. Among these are: “The Quran Unveiled”, “What the Bible Says About the Church of Christ”, “Surrendering to His Lordship”, “The Silencing of God”, and “Why People Suffer”.55 He teaches that…

While the specific recipients of the promise of the Holy Spirit and the baptism of fire are not specified, there are no passages limiting either of those events to the apostles alone.

Let’s examine what Robert S. Liichow, the leader of Discernment Ministries, says about this topic.

The late Robert S. Liichow was an author, speaker, and ministry consultant for discernment ministries. He is probably best known for founding the apologetic/polemical ministry Discernment Ministries International, whose purpose is “to teach Truth and expose Error.” Ministry materials report that Mr. Liichow attended the University of Michigan and then became heavily involved in the Charismatics and related expressions, such as the Word-of-Faith movement, Prophetic, Apostolic, Signs and Wonders, and Discipleship Movements. Those same ministry reports also say that both Mr. Liichow and his wife, Tracy, eventually exited the charismatic extreme movement after attending Michigan Theological Seminary, completing a Master’s Degree. In addition to being described as a prolific writer, church consultant, exit counselor, and a frequent radio guest, other public accounts state that Mr. Liichow later studied at Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne. Criticisms of Charismatic manifestations and revivals are commonly associated with Mr. Liichow’s work through Discernment Ministries International and in two of his writings entitled Blessing or Judgment? The Origins of Manifestations in the Church (2002), and The Two Roots of Today’s Revival (1997). Finally, publicly available documents show that by February 2014, he had passed away when his sister Donna L. Hurlbert posted his name on her obituary as one of several deceased brothers.57 Commenting on Acts 2:1, he states

This statement can be quite amusing for those who have studied the relevant passages in depth, but it may also reveal his own bias. It’s important to note that the group referred to as “they” by Luke includes more than just the twelve disciples, as Luke 24:33-36 clearly shows. Why would he ignore the narrative information in the passage? We will explicitly demonstrate this later. Remember to read the text slowly.

Our last theologian for this section is Mark Dunagan, who agrees with Robert Liichow.

Mark Dunagan is a modern-day Bible commentator and teacher in the Churches of Christ who has created extensive free commentaries to assist in the study and teaching of scripture. According to publicly available ministry profiles, Mark has been involved in preaching and teaching since the early 1980’s; additionally, Mark has been associated with the Beaverton Church of Christ in Oregon for many years. The commentaries have been published on his website and at other locations, such as StudyLight and SermonIndex, and are presented as multi-volume works covering the entire Bible. He uses a practical-expositional approach in each volume, combining textual analysis, cross-referencing, and direct applications from the text. In addition to his commentaries, he also offers additional resources through his teaching ministry in audio, video, and online formats. As a result of this effort, Mark has become a recognized figure in conservative circles of the Restoration Movement as an author committed to providing an easy-to-understand, all-encompassing presentation of the Bible.58 In the Acts 2 section of his commentary, he writes,

His arguments mirror those of other proponents of the apostles-only position, although he has introduced a few additional points. There is a lot to address here, but I will save my responses for the article’s exegetical section.

Let’s continue this conversation into the twenty-first century, Part Five. This will be the final part of the historical investigation on this matter.

  1. Edward Michael Zerr is identified as born on October 15, 1877, in Strasburg, Illinois, and as dying on February 22, 1960, in memorial records and later biographical notices. These same notices report that he moved with his family to Missouri, was baptized at age seventeen, preached for many years, served as an elder in New Castle, Indiana, and spent more than seven years in full-time labor producing his six-volume Bible Commentary. Retail and publication summaries further describe him as having preached for 58 years, delivered more than 8,000 sermons, and contributed to several religious periodicals. ↩︎
  2. E. M. Zerr, Bible Commentary, vol. 5, Matthew to Revelation (n.p.: Mission Messenger, 1952), comment on Acts 1:5. ↩︎
  3. E. M. Zerr, Bible Commentary, vol. 5, Matthew to Revelation (n.p.: Mission Messenger, 1952), comment on Acts 2:1. ↩︎
  4. Thomas Walker is identified as “Thomas Walker [1881–1950]” in the bibliographic records for The Acts of the Apostles. The Indian Church Commentaries (Madras: SPCK Depository, 1910) and Is Not This The Son of Joseph? An Exposition of the relevant chapters of the Gospels in the Light of Jewish Culture (London: James Clarke & Co., [1937]. ↩︎
  5. T. Walker, The Acts of the Apostles (New York: The MacMillan Co., 1919), 16. ↩︎
  6. Ibid., 27. ↩︎
  7. James Burton Coffman Biography, ACU Press & Leafwood Publishers, accessed March 29, 2026; “James Burton Coffman Papers, 1901–1990,” finding aid, Center for Restoration Studies Archives, Abilene Christian University, published December 10, 2021; Staff Reports, “Minister Burton Coffman Dies at 101,” The Christian Chronicle, August 1, 2006; “Books Available—Coffman’s Commentaries on the Bible,” StudyLight.org, accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
  8. James Burton Coffman, Coffman Commentaries, vol. 5, 37 vols. (Abilene, TX: Abilene Christian University Press, 1974), notes on Acts 2. ↩︎
  9. “Dupont, Jacques (1915–1998),” Bibliothèque nationale de France, which identifies him as a Benedictine of Saint-André de Clerlande, doctor of theology at Louvain in 1946, an exegete specializing in Acts, and a participant in the translation of the Bible de Jérusalem; see also Persée authority record, “Dupont, Jacques,” giving the same scholarly profile; and Mark Barnes, The Gift of Prophecy in the New Covenant, citing Jacques Dupont’s article “Le Salut des Gentils et la signification théologique du livre des Actes,” New Testament Studies 6 (1959–60): 132–55. ↩︎
  10. Jacques Dupont, The Salvation of the Gentiles: Essays on the Acts of the Apostles. Translated by John R. Keating. New York: Paulist, 1979, 38. ↩︎
  11. Donald F. DeWelt is identified as “Donald F. ‘Don’ DeWelt (1919–1991)” in memorial records, giving his birth and death dates as February 19, 1919, and June 12, 1991. Institutional histories further note that he taught at Ozark Bible College from 1957 to 1985 and founded College Press in 1959. His published works include Acts Made Actual and The Power of the Holy Spirit, the latter identifying him on its title page as “Professor at Ozark Bible College, Joplin, Missouri.” ↩︎
  12. Don DeWelt, Acts Made Actual (Joplin, Missouri: College Press, 1958), p. 35. ↩︎
  13. “Roy Gingrich,” Faithlife author profile, accessed April 6, 2026; “Roy Edward Gingrich Obituary,” Legacy.com (from The Commercial Appeal), published December 2005, accessed April 6, 2026.
    “Roy Gingrich’s Commentaries in Outline Form (100 vols.),” Logos, accessed April 6, 2026; Roy E. Gingrich, The New Testament Survey, Biblia preview, accessed April 6, 2026; Roy E. Gingrich, Introduction to Theology (Volume One), Biblia preview, accessed April 6, 2026; Roy E. Gingrich, “The Book of Genesis Introduction,” PDF hosted at Roy Gingrich Ministries, accessed April 6, 2026.
    Roy Gingrich Ministries, homepage, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
  14. Roy E. Gingrich, The Book of Acts (Memphis, TN: Riverside Printing, 2002), 9. ↩︎
  15. “Missionary Baptist Seminary,” Encyclopedia of Arkansas, which identifies Albert Garner as a notable graduate, writer, debater, and founder of Florida Baptist Schools; and The Encyclopedia of Religious Debates, which lists “Albert Garner [Missionary Baptist Church], August 1, 1920 … August 23, 2007” and identifies him within the public debate tradition. ↩︎
  16. Garner, Albert & Howes, J.C. “Commentary on Acts 1”. Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary. https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/ghb/acts-1.html. 1985. ↩︎
  17. Langham Partnership, “About John Stott, Langham Partnership Founder,” accessed March 29, 2026; John Stott, “Life,” johnstott.org, accessed March 29, 2026; David Turner, “The Rev John Stott Obituary,” The Guardian, July 28, 2011; Lausanne Movement, “Story of Lausanne,” accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “John R. W. Stott,” author page, accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “Books by John Stott,” accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
  18. John R. W. Stott, The Message of Acts: The Spirit, the Church & the World, The Bible Speaks Today (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994), 78. ↩︎
  19. “Joe Hisle Obituary,” Legacy Remembers, published December 21, 2009, accessed April 6, 2026; Joe J. Hisle, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles (Yukon, OK: Contending for the Faith Publications, 2002); Let No Man Despise Thy Youth (Sermons by Joe Hisle) (LaGrange, GA: Bible Way Publications), product description, Legacy Music Publishing, accessed April 6, 2026; “Sermons by Joe Hisle,” Ada Church of Christ, accessed April 6, 2026; “Joe Hisle,” Let the Bible Speak, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
  20. Joe J. Hisle, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, Contending for the Faith (Yukon, OK: Contending for the Faith Publications, 2002), notes on Acts 2. ↩︎
  21. Ibid., notes on Acts 1:8. ↩︎
  22. Jay E. Adams, “Author Interview with Jay Adams,” P&R Publishing, February 20, 2015; Donn R. Arms, “Dr. Jay E. Adams,” Institute for Nouthetic Studies, August 17, 2023.
    Westminster Media, “Pastoral Theology,” accessed April 7, 2026; Christian Counseling & Educational Foundation, “Beliefs & History,” accessed April 7, 2026; Jay E. Adams, Competent to Counsel (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1970); Zondervan, “Jay E. Adams,” author page, accessed April 7, 2026d ↩︎
  23. Jay E. Adams, Acts, The Christian Counselor’s Commentary (Cordova, TN: Institute for Nouthetic Studies, 2020), 8. ↩︎
  24. “About – Norman Geisler,” Norman Geisler’s official website, which describes him as a prolific author, professor, philosopher, apologist, evangelist, and theologian; “A Personal Tribute to Dr. Norman Geisler,” Southern Evangelical Seminary, which highlights his institutional leadership and influence in evangelical apologetics; and “Who Was Norman Geisler?” GotQuestions, which summarizes his role as an architect of the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy and his major scholarly emphases. ↩︎
  25. Norman Geisler, “Appendix One: Only the Apostles Spoke in Tongues at Pentecost,” in Systematic Theology: Church, Last Things, vol. 4, 4 vols. (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 2005), locations 17693, Kindle Edition; ↩︎
  26. “Francis Nigel Lee Manuscript Collection – MS#099,” PCA Historical Center, which summarizes Lee’s birth in England, childhood move to South Africa, 1957 conversion, academic degrees, and later ministerial and teaching career; “Dr. Francis Nigel Lee,” Frontline Fellowship memorial notice, December 23, 2011; and “Francis Nigel Lee,” biographical summary. ↩︎
  27. Francis Nigel Lee, “Calvinism on the Holy Spirit: John Calvin on the Constant Need to Keep on Being Filled with the Spirit” (Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Presbyterian Theological College, n.d.), accessed August 20, 2024, https://www.scribd.com/document/109894544/coths, 23. ↩︎
  28. University of Aberdeen, “Rev Prof Howard Marshall,” News, December 17, 2015, accessed March 29, 2026; BiblicalTraining, “I. Howard Marshall,” professor profile, accessed March 29, 2026.
    Methodist-Wesley Research Centre, “Marshall,” accessed March 29, 2026; Eerdmans Publishing, “I. Howard Marshall,” author page, accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “I. Howard Marshall,” author page, accessed March 29, 2026; Eerdmans Publishing, The Gospel of Luke, book page, accessed March 29, 2026; InterVarsity Press, Acts, book page, accessed March 29, 2026.
    Ray Van Neste, “I. Howard Marshall, New Testament Scholar, Dies at 81,” The Gospel Coalition, December 12, 2015. ↩︎
  29. I. Howard Marshall, The Acts of the Apostles: An Introduction and Commentary (India: Inter-Varsity Press, 1980), 68. ↩︎
  30. Richard H. Snell is identified as the author of doctrinal and exegetical articles published by the Lexington Church of Christ, including “Who Were Baptized In The Holy Spirit On The Day Of Pentecost?” and “The Veil of the Tabernacle and the Great Controversy as Taught by E. G. White and the Seventh Day Adventists.” These sources establish him as a Church of Christ writer and Bible teacher. ↩︎
  31. Richard H. Snell, “Who Were Baptized In The Holy Spirit On The Day Of Pentecost?” Church of Christ, https://www.churchofchristlexne.org/what-we-believe/baptism-of-spirit.html, accessed July 29, 2024. ↩︎
  32. Ibid. ↩︎
  33. “Truth Magazine Volume 40 – 1996,” Truth Magazine, accessed April 6, 2026; “Truth Magazine Volume 45 – 2001,” Truth Magazine, accessed April 6, 2026; Carl A. Allen, “Did 120 Receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:1-4?,” La Vista Church of Christ, September 19, 2007, accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
  34.  Carl A. Allen, “Did 120 Receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:1-4?,” La Vista Church of Christ, 2007, https://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/cms/did-120-receive-the-baptism-of-the-holy-spirit-in-acts-21-4/. ↩︎
  35. Ibid. ↩︎
  36. Ibid. ↩︎
  37. “Theologian and Churchman Richard B. Gaffin Jr.,” New Horizons (Orthodox Presbyterian Church), which notes his birth in Peiping, China, in 1936, his missionary family background, and his long role in the life of the OPC; “The Rev. Dr. Richard B. Gaffin Jr.,” Ordained Servant (Orthodox Presbyterian Church), on his interwoven ministry with Westminster Theological Seminary and the OPC; and Westminster Theological Seminary media, describing him as Professor Emeritus of Biblical and Systematic Theology. ↩︎
  38. Richard B. Gaffin Jr., Perspectives on Pentecost: Studies in the New Testament Teaching on the Gifts of the Holy Spirit (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1979). ↩︎
  39. Boyd Wayne Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson,” Old Paths Archive, accessed April 7, 2026; “Wayne Jackson and members of the East Main Church of Christ in Stockton, California, launched the Christian Courier in May 1965,” Christian Courier, “About,” accessed April 7, 2026; Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson.”
    Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson.”; “On the Shelf: New items added to Center for Restoration Studies collections, March 2024,” Abilene Christian University Special Collections, June 11, 2024; Jackson, “Biography of Boyd Wayne Jackson.” ↩︎
  40. Wayne Jackson, “The Holy Spirit and the Apostles,” Christian Courier, accessed August 31, 2024, https://christiancourier.com/articles/the-holy-spirit-and-the-apostles. ↩︎
  41. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Southern Seminary Catalog, 2003–2004 (Louisville, KY: The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2003), 50; John B. Polhill, “The Setting of 2 John and 3 John,” Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 10, no. 3 (Fall 2006): 28; B&H Academic, “John Polhill,” contributor page, accessed March 29, 2026; Faithlife, “Paul and His Letters,” author information, accessed March 29, 2026.
    The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Southern Seminary Catalog, 2008–2009 (Louisville, KY: The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2008), 43, 153. ↩︎
  42. John B. Polhill, Acts, vol. 26, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1992), 97. ↩︎
  43. Ron Graham, “Author of simplybible — Ron Graham,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Ron Graham, “Lessons Taught at Bundaberg — Period 2009–2017,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Ron Graham, “Acts Chapter One — Acts 1:1–8 Verse by Verse,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Ron Graham, “Topical Index,” Simply Bible, accessed April 9, 2026; Blacktown Church of Christ, “Bible Commentary Links,” accessed April 9, 2026. ↩︎
  44. Ron Graham, Acts 2:1-13, Theological, SimplyBible.Com, last modified 2016, accessed October 12, 2024, https://www.simplybible.com/f007-acts-c2-v1-13.htm. ↩︎
  45. Rogersville Church of Christ, “Windell Gann,” accessed April 6, 2026; Rogersville Church of Christ, “Bible Study Material,” accessed April 6, 2026; Windell Gann, “Windell Gann: Bible Study Resources,” accessed April 6, 2026; StudyLight.org, “Books Available—Gann’s Commentary on the Bible,” accessed April 6, 2026; Selected Histories of Fayette County Churches (Fayette County Public Library, n.d.), 20. ↩︎
  46. Windell Gann, “Commentary on Acts 2:1,” StudyLight.Org, last modified 2021, accessed September 22, 2024, https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/gbc/acts-2.html. ↩︎
  47. “Obituary for Dr. Grant R. Osborne,” Laura Sambrano Funeral Chapel, published November 2018; InterVarsity Press, “The Hermeneutical Spiral,” author and book page.
    Trinity International University, a news item referring to Osborne as a former TEDS professor; Tyndale House Publishers, “Grant R. Osborne, 1942–2018”; Tyndale, “Meet the Bible Translation Committee.”; Brill, On the Writing of New Testament Commentaries: Festschrift for Grant R. Osborne on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday. ↩︎
  48. Grant R. Osborne, Acts: Verse by Verse, Osborne New Testament Commentaries (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2019), 39–59. ↩︎
  49. University of Edinburgh School of Divinity, “Professor Lee Martin McDonald,” accessed April 7, 2026; Lee Martin McDonald, author profile, AbeBooks, accessed April 7, 2026; Lee McDonald, faculty profile, Academia.edu, accessed April 7, 2026; Rob Heaton, “Lee Martin McDonald, Before There Was a Bible: Authorities in Early Christianity (T&T Clark, 2023),” New Books Network, May 26, 2023; Bloomsbury, “Lee Martin McDonald,” author page, accessed April 7, 2026; Lee Martin McDonald, “The Emergence of Biblical Canons in Orthodox Christianity,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in Orthodox Christianity, Oxford Academic, published May 19, 2022. ↩︎
  50. Lee Martin McDonald, Acts, in The Bible Knowledge Background Commentary: Acts–Philemon, ed. Craig A. Evans and Craig A. Bubeck, First Edition. (Colorado Springs, CO: David C Cook, 2004), 26–28. ↩︎
  51. Moore Theological College, “The Rev Dr David G Peterson,” faculty profile, accessed April 7, 2026; David G. Peterson, “About,” David G. Peterson – Biblical Theology and Worship, accessed April 7, 2026; InterVarsity Press, “David G. Peterson,” author page, accessed April 7, 2026; David Peterson, The Acts of the Apostles (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009), author description; Google Books bibliographic entry; Credo Magazine, “David Peterson on the New Covenant,” September 2012, accessed April 7, 2026. ↩︎
  52. David G. Peterson, The Acts of the Apostles, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI; Nottingham, England: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2009), 132. ↩︎
  53. Ben Witherington III, “Curriculum Vitae,” Dr. Ben Witherington III, accessed March 29, 2026; Asbury Theological Seminary, “Dr. Ben Witherington III,” accessed March 29, 2026; Ben Witherington III, “About Dr. Ben,” Dr. Ben Witherington III, accessed March 29, 2026; Eerdmans Publishing, “Ben Witherington III,” accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
  54. Ben Witherington III, The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998). (Kindle Locations 4382-4385). Kindle Edition. ↩︎
  55. Apologetics Press, “Dave Miller,” author profile, accessed April 6, 2026; Apologetics Press, “AP Staff Spotlight: Dr. Dave Miller, AP Bible Department,” published October 1, 2025, accessed April 6, 2026; Apologetics Press, “New Executive Director of AP,” published August 10, 2023, accessed April 6, 2026; Dave Miller, The Quran Unveiled (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2005), Library of Congress cataloging data identifying the author as “Dave Miller (1953–); ”Dave Miller, What the Bible Says About the Church of Christ (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2007), Library of Congress cataloging data; Dave Miller, Surrendering to His Lordship (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press, 2012); Apologetics Press, “Free PDF Books,” accessed April 6, 2026.
    Apologetics Press Store, “Why People Suffer,” accessed April 6, 2026. ↩︎
  56. Dave Miller, “Modern-Day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation-EXTENDED,” Reason & Revelation 23, no. 3 (2003). ↩︎
  57. “About Our Ministry,” Discernment Ministries International; “Blessing or Judgment?: The Origins of Manifestations in the Church,” Amazon book listing, accessed April 9, 2026; “Truth Matters – Lunacy in Lakeland – by Rev. Robert S. Liichow,” repost introduction, August 14, 2008, accessed April 9, 2026; Robert Liichow, Blessing or Judgment? The Origins of Manifestations in the Church (2002); Paul Fahy, The Charismatic Catastrophe, citing Robert S. Liichow, The Two Roots of Today’s Revival (Morris Publishing, 1997); “Donna L. (Liichow) Hurlbert Obituary,” Heffner Funeral Chapel & Crematory, February 15, 2014. ↩︎
  58. Liichow, Robert. “Supernatural Speech in Acts.” Truth Matters (Detroit, MI), October 2013. ↩︎
  59. StudyLight.org, “Books Available—Dunagan’s Commentary on the Bible,” accessed March 29, 2026, https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/dun.html; StudyLight.org, “Comprehensive Overview of the Bible Commentaries available FREELY on StudyLight.org!,” accessed March 29, 2026, https://www.studylight.org/commentaries.html; Nomads You & I, “Mark Dunagan’s Free Biblical Resources,” accessed March 29, 2026, https://nomadsyouandi.com/pages/mark-dunagans-bible-commentaries; Nomads You & I, “Nomads You and I – Mark and Cindy Dunagan – Podcast,” accessed March 29, 2026, https://nomadsyouandi.com/; Fortress Christian School, “Chapel Guest Speaker – Mark Dunagan,” Facebook post snippet surfaced in search results, accessed March 29, 2026. ↩︎
  60. Dunagan, Mark. “Commentary on Acts 2”. “Dunagan’s Commentaries on the Bible,” accessed March 29, 2026. https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/dun/acts-2.html. 1999-2014 ↩︎

Who Initially Received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost? A Challenge to the Apostles-Only Perspective (Part Two)

“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the “Apostles-Only View” and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will continue to provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. In Part One, we investigated theologians’ insights into the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit, spanning the early church to the Reformation Era. Now, let’s enthusiastically journey into Part Two, where we will continue to uncover the fascinating perspectives of theologians on this subject through the eighteenth century!

This section contributes to the rich historical viewpoints regarding the original recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. While the inquiry into who received this divine gift was notably presented by Chrysostom in the fourth century, it is intriguing to note that, to my knowledge, no theologian has argued that the Twelve Apostles were the sole recipients when the Holy Spirit descended. Let’s explore this fascinating topic further!

We have examined the Reformation Era’s perspectives on who first received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. In this section, we will closely analyze the contributions of eighteenth-century theologians, starting with the insightful Matthew Henry.

Matthew Henry, though strictly speaking lived in the 17th century, did not begin his commentary until 1704.1 He is considered an English nonconformist pastor who interpreted scripture in a commentary titled “An Exposition of the Old and New Testament,” and is among the most influential and widely read scriptural interpreters in all of Protestant History. Born at Broad Oak in Flintshire, the son of noted Pastor Philip Henry, he was raised in a strong puritan/dissenting home and later educated by the dissenting Pastor Thomas Doolittle at his academy. Matthew Henry studied law at Gray’s Inn but ultimately devoted his life almost exclusively to pastoring, serving for decades as a Presbyterian pastor at Chester, then later at Hackney. His reputation for being a powerful, devotional preacher and for applying the theological aspects of the Bible in a way that was useful to the people of God grew and spread throughout the world. The way he approached the Bible in interpreting it has had a lasting impact on Evangelicalism, Presbyterianism, Baptism, Methodism, and virtually every other form of Protestant Christianity. This is due largely to the fact that his interpretations are warm, clear, and provide insight into both the preaching of the gospel and the study of the Word of God. 2 In his commentary on Acts 2:4, Henry writes:

“It seems evident to me that not only the twelve apostles, but all the hundred and twenty disciples were filled with the Holy Ghost alike at this time.”3

He goes on:

“The “all” here must refer to the all that were together, v. 1; ch. 1:14, 15.”.4

Henry serves as a clear early eighteenth-century witness against the “Apostles Only” perspective. He explicitly identifies the recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:4 as all 120 disciples mentioned in Acts 1:14-15. As will be demonstrated later, the biblical passages on this question indicate that more than 120 disciples initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.

John Gill agrees with Henry and provides insights that will enhance our understanding of the topic.

John Gill was a prominent eighteenth-century Particular Baptist minister, theologian, and biblical interpreter. His scholarly writings established him as perhaps the most influential Baptist divine of the Eighteenth Century. Gill was born at Kettering, Northants. From early on, he demonstrated extraordinary intellectual gifts, and consequently, much of what he learned in language and theology, he learned by himself. Baptized in 1716, ordained shortly after, and entering the pastoral ministry, Gill became the Pastor of the Baptist congregation at Horsleydown, Southwark, in 1719, serving that congregation for over 50 years. Through his voluminous writing, particularly “An Exposition of the New Testament,” “A Complete Body of Doctrinal and Practical Divinity,” and his defense of Calvinistic Baptist Theology, Gill acquired a lasting reputation. Gill is remembered for marrying together an impressive pastoral ministry and an equally impressive scholarly expertise in Hebrew, theology, and biblical exposition. His influence reached well beyond Britain and America to many other Baptist and Calvinistic circles.5 In relation to Acts 2:1, Gill provides the following comments:

“Though this need not be restrained to the twelve apostles, but may be understood of the hundred and twenty.”6

On Acts 2:4, he adds:

“Not only the twelve apostles, but the seventy disciples; and it may be all the hundred and twenty, that were together, even women as well as men.”7

And in Acts 2:15, he mentions more than just the twelve.

“Meaning not only the eleven apostles, but the rest of the hundred and twenty, on whom also the Spirit was poured forth.”8

Gill stands out as a remarkable example from the eighteenth century, effectively challenging the Apostles-Only paradigm by thoughtfully including both women and men, making his perspective truly significant and enlightening.

Next, John Wesley expresses his perspective on the 120.

John Wesley was a clergy member, evangelist, and theologian in the Church of England, most renowned as the founder of Methodism in England. Wesley was born at Epworth Rectory in Lincolnshire. He attended Charterhouse School and then Christ Church, Oxford. Wesley was ordained a deacon in 1725 and a priest in 1728. During his first years of ministry in Oxford and his ill-fated missionary adventure in Georgia, Wesley’s religious beliefs were transformed by the evangelical awakening of the time and the Aldersgate experience in 1738. Following that experience, Wesley was instrumental in the revival of religion in England during the 18th century; he traveled throughout England, preached to people from all walks of life, organized the Methodist Societies, and wrote numerous works, including sermons, journals, letters, and biblical notes. Although he never broke with the Church of England, Wesley’s theology, evangelistic fervor, and method of church organization formed the basis of the later Methodist tradition.9 Wesley shares his insights on Acts 2:1.

“They were all with one accord in one place … the whole hundred and twenty being present.”10

Wesley’s statement is much more succinct than Henry’s or Gill’s. It indicates that Acts 2:1 refers to the entire group of 120 people, not just the apostles.

Now, I invite you to explore the insightful thoughts of the Methodist theologian John Fletcher on this issue.

John Fletcher (1729-1785) was an Anglican clergyman, theologian, and Methodist divine who, through his writings, became the most important interpreter of Wesleyan theology in the 18th century. Fletcher was born in Nyon, Switzerland. He studied at GeneBeforer before entering Holy Orders in the Church of England in 1751. Fletcher had planned to pursue a career in the military when he moved from Geneva to England in 1750. Fletcher became both a Curate and a Vicar of the parish church in Madeley, Shropshire; however, he worked very closely with John Wesley during the evangelical revival movement. Fletcher’s renown would endure for generations through his works, including Checks to Antinomianism, in which he defended Wesleyan Arminian Theology against Calvinist opponents. Fletcher was also recognized for his piety, pastoral zeal, and theological abilities. Although Fletcher remained an ordained member of the Church of England, he would eventually become one of the most influential theological contributors to the development of early Methodism and was considered by John Wesley a possible successor.11 On this topic, Fletcher does not adhere to an Apostles-Only perspective. In fact, he writes…

“How strangely those professors deceive themselves, who confidently affirm that the Holy Spirit was promised to the apostles alone.”13

I completely agree with Fletcher on this matter.

Let’s look forward to what Thomas Coke will have to say on this point.

Thomas Coke was a prominent figure in early Methodism, helping develop its mission work across both Britain and America. A clergyman of the Anglican Church, Methodist leader, missionary organizer, and biblical commentator, Coke was a close associate of John Wesley. He became second only to him in importance among those involved in early Methodism. Thomas Coke was born in Brecon, Wales. He attended Jesus College, Oxford University. He was ordained by the Church of England and began serving as a curate. However, as Coke’s support for Methodism continued to grow, so did the conflict he experienced. The conflict eventually led to Coke’s separation from the parish ministry. In time, Coke became one of Wesley’s inner circle and one of his most trusted advisors. Coke then became instrumental in establishing Methodism in both Britain and America. Coke is particularly noted for his leadership in Methodist missions, his repeated labors across the Atlantic Ocean, his contributions to the establishment of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and his writings. Coke wrote a comprehensive biblical commentary. Coke’s dedication to spreading Methodism, his organizational skills, and his missionary vision have made him one of the key architects of early global Methodism.14 Coke’s viewpoint is clearly evident in his summary heading for Acts 2.

“The apostles, filled with the Holy Ghost, and speaking divers languages…”15

Could this suggest that he thought only the Apostles received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost? If that quote were all he had said, it would raise some questions. While it’s true that the Apostles experienced this profound gift, were there others who also received the Holy Spirit? Coke’s ongoing discussion provides additional clarity on this intriguing topic. He poses the question:

“Why might not the Holy Spirit fall down upon all the hundred and twenty…?”16

and adds that Peter’s appeal to Joel supports the presence of

“women as well as men.”17

Coke’s heading appears to focus solely on the apostles, but his exposition broadens the event’s scope to include the wider audience present, specifically women. Clearly, he includes more than just the Twelve Apostles as recipients of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.

Joseph Benson, our next theologian, shares the following insights.

Joseph Benson was a theologian, bible commentator, and Methodist minister; Benson would be recognized as one of the most prominent leaders of early Wesleyan Methodism following the death of John Wesley. Benson was born in Cumberland and received an education with the intention of entering the established clergy. Instead, Benson converted to Methodism at a relatively young age and shortly thereafter began receiving recognition from John Wesley for his educational contributions and preaching abilities. Benson continued to make significant contributions to the Methodist movement through his role as a preacher, apologist, editor, and conference leader. Benson made several notable contributions to theology and exegesis. Benson is best known for defending the Methodist movement, for being an Arminian, and for authoring A Commentary on the Old and New Testament.18 Benson interprets Acts 2:4 as follows:

“They were all filled with the Holy Ghost — That is, all the one hundred and twenty, as appears from Acts 2:1.”19

He continues by saying:

“This whole company was abundantly replenished with both the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit.”20

“It seems evident that not the twelve apostles only, but all the one hundred and twenty disciples were endowed with the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost at this time.”21

Benson’s perspective is valuable because he is exceptionally direct: for him, “all” in Acts 2:4 refers to all 120 people. He certainly does not, therefore, teach an Apostle-Only perspective. Although I agree that more than the apostles initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on that first Pentecost, Scripture includes more than 120 disciples. I will provide the evidence for this later in the article.

The nineteenth century sparked an engaging dialogue about the first recipients of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. This captivating conversation continued into the next century and remains relevant even today. Now, let’s eagerly investigate the fascinating developments of the nineteenth century!


  1. Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, ed. John Brown (1852; reprint, Grand Rapids: Christian Classics, 1960), 1:3. ↩︎
  2. Leslie Stephen, “Henry, Matthew,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, accessed March 18, 2026. ↩︎
  3. Matthew Henry, An Exposition of the Old and New Testament (London, 1708–1710), on Acts 2:4. ↩︎
  4. Ibid. ↩︎
  5. Leslie Stephen, “Gill, John,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, accessed March 18, 2026; and “Gill, John (1697–1771), Particular Baptist minister and theologian,” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. ↩︎
  6. John Gill, An Exposition of the New Testament (London, 1746–1748), on Acts 2:1. ↩︎
  7. Ibid., 2:4. ↩︎
  8. Ibid., 2:15. ↩︎
  9. “John Wesley,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, last modified February 26, 2026, accessed March 18, 2026; Leslie Stephen, “Wesley, John,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and Henry D. Rack, “Wesley [Westley], John (1703–1791), Church of England clergyman and a founder of Methodism,” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. ↩︎
  10. John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (London, 1755), on Acts 2.:1; John Wesley, The New Testament, with Explanatory Notes, Digitized March 29, 2007. (London: Oxford University, 1869), 278. ↩︎
  11. “John William Fletcher,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; Leslie Stephen, “Fletcher, John William,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and Encyclopedia Britannica, “John William Fletcher,” accessed March 21, 2026. ↩︎
  12. John Fletcher, The Works of the Rev. John Fletcher, Late Vicar of Madeley, ed. John Kershaw, 8th ed., vol. VI, VII vols. (London: United Kingdom: n.. p., Digitized: November 3, 2023, 1826).193. ↩︎
  13. “Thomas Coke,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified January 17, 2026, accessed March 18, 2026; “Coke, Thomas (1747–1814),” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and “Thomas Coke (1747–1814),” The United Methodist Church, accessed March 18, 2026. ↩︎
  14. Thomas Coke, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (London, 1801–1803), summary on Acts 2. ↩︎
  15. Ibid. ↩︎
  16. Ibid. ↩︎
  17. Leslie Stephen, “Benson, Joseph,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900, accessed March 18, 2026; “Benson, Joseph (1749–1821; e.m. 1771),” The Encyclopedia of World Methodism / DMBI Online; and John Rylands Library, “Joseph Benson Papers,” accessed March 18, 2026. ↩︎
  18. Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (London, 1811–1818), on Acts 2:4. ↩︎
  19. Ibid. ↩︎
  20. Ibid. ↩︎

Who Initially Received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost? Challenging the Apostles-Only Perspective (Part One)

“Who first received the Baptism With the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the “Gift of the Holy Spirit”) on the Day of Pentecost has been debated by Bible students, theologians, and scholars for over one hundred years. Different views exist about whether the Holy Spirit was both promised and given to the apostles alone on the Day of Pentecost (the “Apostles-Only View”) or if all 120 followers of Jesus mentioned in Acts 1:15, or all the disciples of Jesus gathered, received the Holy Spirit. This article will examine the Apostles-Only View and challenge it on exegetical grounds. Before examining the claims made by the Apostles-Only advocates, I will provide a well-researched overview of theologians’ perspectives throughout Church history, offering historical-theological context for the controversy. The list will encompass not only early church theologians but also writers, presenters, and theologians up to the 21st century. While I intend for this list to be comprehensive, I am aware that it may not be exhaustive. If you know of any commentaries, writers, or theologians who have addressed this topic, please reach out to me. Let our theological journey begin.

I have organized the historical quotes according to the birthdates and lifespans of the authors or theologians, rather than by the dates of their written works. I find this method a simpler way to organize the information. If you are looking for the date of a specific quotation, please refer to the detailed footnotes for accurate references. Since the main objective is to highlight the exegetical shortcomings of the Apostles-Only position and provide sound exegetical responses, each quotation supporting the Apostles-Only position will be presented with a red background and white lettering for easy reference. Quotes from other authors will support the idea that 120 disciples initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, or that more than 120 did. For example,

It’s important to note that the quotes highlighted in red begin in the 19th-century section. Before this period, every author unanimously agreed that more than just the twelve apostles initially received the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. Most of the theologians examined in this article believe that the 120 individuals mentioned in Acts 1 were included. Additionally, some argue that the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit may have encompassed more than just these 120, a perspective I also share. Additionally, please note that each section of this article focuses on a specific historical period. Some authors cover multiple time periods, making their categorization less straightforward than I initially anticipated. Consequently, categorizing them has involved some subjectivity. Regardless of your conclusions after exploring this subject, I wish you the best in your pursuit of understanding.

This segment offers an engaging overview of pre-Reformation theologians and their insightful perspectives on the remarkable individuals who received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost.

Cyril of Jerusalem was a clergy member in Jerusalem, a teacher of new converts, and a theologian. His writings give insight into the faith and worship of Christians in Jerusalem during the 4th century. It is believed that Cyril was born in Jerusalem; he became a priest around mid-century. As a priest, he instructed catechumens (a teaching program that would later be called The Catechetical Lectures). At some point in 350, Cyril was appointed Bishop of Jerusalem. Most of his time as bishop was spent in conflict with other bishops over theological issues. This conflict led to his expulsion from Jerusalem at least once due to the Arian issue. He also had problems with Acacius of Caesarea. Cyril is especially remembered for saving the catechetical and mystagogical lectures. These lectures contain a wealth of information on the theology, sacraments, and devotions of the early Christian community. Cyril became a saint and Doctor of the Church, largely because of his contributions to these two areas of the faith.1 Cyril states that on the day of Pentecost, the Holy Spirit…

“descended on the Apostles in the form of fiery tongues.” 2

His statement does not clarify whether he believed that others, aside from the twelve apostles, also initially received the Holy Spirit. It only indicates that the Holy Spirit fell upon the apostles. Another theologian, Thomas Coke (1747 – 1814), wrote in one place that the Holy Spirit filled the Apostles,3 but later includes the 120 mentioned in the text as well.4 However, Cyril does not provide any further references to this comment in his other writings, leaving this quote ambiguous.

Looking ahead, it’s important to highlight that John Chrysostom thoughtfully considered the identity of his audience when he delivered his remarkable homily on Acts 2.

John Chrysostom is considered one of the most influential of the early Greek church fathers. He was educated in the classical rhetorical tradition before entering an ascetic/ecclesiastical career. As a deacon and later as a presbyter at Antioch, John developed a reputation as one of the best preachers of the day, both for eloquence and exegetical depth, and thus earned the nickname Chrysostomos (“the golden mouth”). He was appointed bishop of Constantinople by Theodosius I in 39. While there, he made great strides in initiating moral reforms within the Church, critiquing the excesses of many clergy and emperors, and continuing his pattern of providing exposition through preaching. However, these actions put him at odds with other high-ranking clergy and officials of the empire, resulting in his removal from office and subsequent exile. During that time, John Chrysostom died in 407 A.D. He is significant in biblical studies because his works include numerous homiletic commentaries on specific texts, including Matthew, John, Acts, Romans, and the Pauline letters. These writings were written from the perspective of the Antiochene school of interpretation, emphasizing the literal and historical aspects of scripture, but also demonstrating pastoral and theological application to their readers.5 When commenting on Acts 2:4, John Chrysostom posed an interesting question. In a transcribed homily of his preaching through the book of Acts, it is recorded that when he reached Acts 2:1-2, he stated,

“Was it upon the twelve that it came?’ Was it upon the twelve that it came? Not so, but upon the hundred and twenty.” 6

The fact that Chrysostom raises this question suggests that some in his day wondered how many people received the Spirit initially on the Day of Pentecost during the fourth century. However, there are no written records by other early Church theologians discussing this topic. For the record, I understand the passages regarding this topic to teach that more than 120 disciples initially received the Holy Spirit on that wonderful first Christian Pentecost. The question of who initially received the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost will be discussed in detail later in the article.

Augustine of Hippo may not address the question directly, yet he will reveal his interpretation of the text, prompting us to consider the implications of his insights.

Augustine is one of the most influential Latin church fathers. Born at Tagaste in Roman North Africa, he studied rhetoric and experienced a period of moral & intellectual struggle — especially with Manichaeism and later Neoplatonism. After his conversion to Christianity and baptism by Ambrose in Milan in AD 387, he returned to the North. Eventually, he became bishop of Hippo in 396, where he died in 430. As a preacher, author, and theologian, Augustine was among the most important figures in Christian history. Through his works (Confessions, On the Trinity, On Christian Doctrine, The City of God), he exerted great influence over Western theology. His ideas were very significant in many areas, including grace, sin, the Church, hermeneutics, and the doctrine of God. Not only did his legacy shape late antiquity, but also medieval, Reformation, and modern Christian theology.7 Augustine first mentions the Holy Spirit descending upon one hundred and twenty people in his response to Petilian during the Donatist Controversy, where he notes,

“One hundred and twenty people had been gathered together when the Holy Spirit came upon them without the laying on of anyone’s hands.”8

He also mentions it again in one of his sermons on the Gospel of John.

“Where had the Church its commencement, but where the Holy Ghost came from heaven, and filled the hundred and twenty sitting in one place?”9

He reaffirms his viewpoint again as he preaches on Psalm 133.

“Whence those hundred and twenty … on whom when gathered into one place the Holy Spirit descended on the day of Pentecost.”10

It’s truly fascinating that he doesn’t address any questions about the original recipients of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost! This leaves us pondering whether Chrysostom’s early question was still up for discussion. However, one thing is abundantly clear: Augustine recognized that the Holy Spirit was bestowed upon more than just the twelve apostles that day, though he concurs with Chrysostom that the total number of recipients was 120. What an interesting topic to explore further!

Let us joyfully explore the insights of the esteemed Venerable Bede, who thoughtfully commented on the Acts of the Apostles, particularly aligning with Augustine on Acts 2:1–18.

Bede the Venerable was an Anglo-Saxon monk, theologian, author of the Bible, historian, and chronicler who, through his extensive knowledge of the scripture, was one of the most important Christian scholars of the western world during the early Middle Ages. Bede lived his whole life within the monastic community, virtually at Wearmouth and Jarrow in Northumbria, where he studied the scripture from a young age. For most of his adult life, Bede dedicated himself to studying and interpreting scripture, teaching, writing, and participating in the liturgical activities of the Church. As well as being ordained as both a deacon and a priest, Bede was known for his wide-ranging scholarly abilities in areas such as the interpretation of biblical texts, historical chronology, biographies of saints (hagiography), hymns (hymnody), and the history of the Church. It is for the Ecclesiastical History of the English People (Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum) that Bede is best known, and it has been a fundamental resource for the history of Christianity among the Anglo-Saxons. In addition to this work, Bede authored many biblical commentaries, making him a central figure in the transmission of knowledge of the early Christian fathers to the Church in the Middle Ages. Due to his vast knowledge, his adherence to orthodoxy, and the ongoing impact of his writings, Bede would eventually be given the title “The Venerable” and would go on to be formally declared a Doctor of the Church.11 In Bede’s commentary on the events of the Day of Pentecost, he explains that…

“The faithful were gathered together in one place.”12

Bede comments on Acts 2, referring to the Pentecost recipients as the gathered “they” who were all together in one place, as well as “the faithful” who were united in the “upper room” when the Holy Spirit arrived. While this description is not as numerically explicit as Chrysostom’s, it still identifies those who received the Spirit at Pentecost. It appears that Bede assumed that all the disciples (the faithful) who gathered together on the Day of Pentecost received the Holy Spirit. The exact number remains unclear, suggesting he may have thought more than 120 received the Spirit when it was first poured out.

We’ve identified some theologians from the pre-Reformation era who have contributed to this topic. Let’s examine the contributions that originated during the Reformation.

While these dates are not officially recognized in the Reformation Era, they serve a valuable purpose for organizing information within this article. Thank you for your understanding! Let’s begin with Martin Luther.

Martin Luther was a German theologian who was one of the most important figures in the Protestant Reformation, primarily through his teachings and writings. Born at Eisleben, he studied the liberal arts and law and entered the Augustinian Monastery at Erfurt. In 1507, he was ordained as a Catholic priest, and later (around 1518), he was appointed Professor of Biblical Studies at the University of Wittenberg. The Ninety-Five Thesis that Luther wrote in 1517 is widely regarded as the first major step toward sparking the Protestant Reformation. As time passed, Luther’s views grew increasingly controversial. Specifically, he believed that salvation came from an individual’s faith in God, that scripture should take precedence over church authority, and that an individual’s good works were less important than their faith. Eventually, this led to great animosity toward him by both the Holy Roman Empire and the Pope, which ultimately ended in a confrontation between Luther and the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V at the Diet of Worms in 1521. Following that, Luther found protection among many of the German Princes, who sympathized with his cause. During this time, Luther continued to write, preach, translate the Bible into German, and help develop the early evangelical movement. Ultimately, Luther’s legacy has been instrumental in developing what is now known as Lutheran theology and continues to have a profound impact on Protestantism today. 13 Regarding the question of this article, Luther states that both the twelve apostles and the entire group gathered on the Day of Pentecost were filled with the Holy Spirit. In a sermon on John 14:23, Luther said that

“the Holy Spirit falls from heaven and fills all the company assembled together,”14

Additionally, he acknowledges that the Spirit.

“comes down and fills the disciples.”15

Though his second quote is somewhat ambiguous, Luther does include more than the original twelve apostles receiving the Gift of the Holy Spirit when he affirms that the Spirit falls and “fills all the company assembled together.” This statement suggests that he believed more than 120 people received the Holy Spirit that day, although it remains unclear to me.

What contributions can we expect from the second renowned Reformer, John Calvin, in the ongoing investigation?

John Calvin (French Reformer and Theologian) was the central figure of the Second Generation of the Protestant Reformation Movement. Calvin was born in Noyon, Picardy; he studied Humanities and Law before dedicating himself to the Protestant Reform. After being forced into exile from France because of his Protestant beliefs, Calvin settled in Geneva and helped shape its Ecclesiastical Order and broader religious climate. Calvin’s preachings, biblical commentaries, letters, and especially his “Institutes of the Christian Religion” had an enormous impact on the theology of the Reformed Church, specifically regarding the authority of scripture, sovereignty of God, predestination, church governance, and the Christian life. As the pastor of Geneva and through his writings, Calvin was the most influential French Protestant Reformer of the sixteenth Century and among the greatest theological figures of early Modern Christianity. 16

Although the Australian Presbyterian Theologian Francis Nigel Lee suggests that John Calvin taught the Apostles-Only position,17 Calvin’s writings suggest otherwise. In the broader context of Luke’s description of those gathering in the upper room in Jerusalem (Acts 1:12-15), Calvin notes in his commentary on Acts 1:14 that the Spirit’s influence extends beyond just the twelve apostles. Interestingly, he includes the apostles’ wives as co-recipients when he writes,

“Who would, therefore, think that they were excluded from their husbands whilst they look for the coming of the Spirit?”18

In the same section of his commentary, he specifically mentions that

“the women are gathered together with them now.”19

Then Calvin points out that he understands Luke’s point, which is that everyone gathered was anticipating the Spirit’s coming, not just the twelve Apostles.

“Here [Luke] showeth that they did diligently look for the coming of the Holy Spirit, for this was the cause of their prayer, that Christ would send his Spirit, as he had promised.”20  

Of particular interest is how, uniquely, Calvin includes the wives of the apostles as well as others in his theological analysis. This suggests that John Calvin held the view that the apostles were not the sole recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit during Pentecost. Those who claim otherwise are simply making unfounded assumptions without evidence to support their assertions.

What can we learn about Calvin’s protégé? It’s time to explore Theodore Beza’s perspective.

The French Reformed theologian and scholar who succeeded John Calvin in Geneva was Theodore Beza. Born in Vézelay, in Burgundy he studied first in the humanities and then law with many noted humanist scholars, such as Melchior Wolmar, before experiencing a personal spiritual conversion in 1548 that led him to Geneva and Calvin, and eventually to become one of the leaders of the Reformed Movement, both academically (Professor of Greek at Lausanne) and ecclesiastically, where he served as one of the primary theological and ecclesiastical leaders in Geneva from Calvin’s death in 1564 until his own death. Beza was instrumental in establishing and defending Reformed Theology, primarily through his writing, biblical scholarship, ecclesiastical leadership, and attendance at the major Christian colloquies, particularly the Colloquy of Poissy. His greatest contributions were to Reformed Dogmatics, his editions of and annotations on the Greek New Testament, and his work as one of the chief architects of Post-Calvin Genevan Protestantism. 21

In his commentary, M. F. Sadler refers to Theodore Beza, the “Ultra-Protestant commentator,” who affirms that the gift of the Spirit is only for the Apostles, based on the context.22 However, there is no evidence supporting this statement. Sadler’s statement may be his own conclusion based upon the remarks of John Gill. John Gill, in his work An Exposition of the New Testament (London, 1746–1748), comments on Acts 2:1 that “in two ancient copies of Beza’s, and in some others, it is read as ‘all the apostles.’” This observation indicates that an extended reading was known within certain parts of the early modern textual tradition and could be used to support the Apostles-Only interpretation. While these manuscripts may exist, I do not have any primary sources to support their existence. The fact of the matter is that the commonly printed Greek text of Acts 2:1 reads ἦσαν πάντες (“they were all”).23

What can be shown with reasonable confidence is that Gill attributes to Beza the knowledge of a variant at Acts 2:1, reading “all the apostles.” Sadler seems to take Gill’s statement as an absolute fact; however, the evidence provided is insufficient. It is speculative to assert more unless these manuscripts can be located.

John Lightfoot shares his insights on the topic being investigated.

John Lightfoot was an English Hebraist (Hebrew scholar), divine, and New Testament biblical interpreter who was born at Stoke-upon-Trent, and after education at Christ’s College, Cambridge, proved to be a highly skilled linguist, as well as an orator. Following ordination in the Church of England, Lightfoot served in several positions as a clergyman and was subsequently appointed as one of the best-known Christians in seventeenth-century England, providing scholarly insights into Jewish antiquity. Lightfoot took part in the Westminster Assembly; then went on to become the Master of St Catharine’s College, Cambridge, and additionally, the Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University. Lightfoot will be best remembered by the amount of knowledge that he demonstrated regarding Hebrew, rabbinic literature, and Second Temple Judaism, when applying these types of scholarly knowledge to the New Testament; Lightfoot’s work (Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae, and his Commentary on Acts) were significant contributions to the development of early modern scholarship to reconstruct the Jewish background of the Gospels and Acts, and have had a lasting effect on how people interpret scripture through biblical exegesis.24 In relation to the topic of this article, he expresses…

“That many, if not all of the 120 received the holy Ghost, and the gift of tongues on Pentecost day; and not the twelve onely.”25

He also mentions in that section,

“It being therefore not to bee denyed, that there were divers others besides the twelve, if not the whole hundred and twenty (which I rather thinke) that received the holy Ghost in the gift of tongues at this time.”26

Lightfoot’s beliefs are clear and compelling. He emphasized that a group of 120 disciples, which included the original twelve apostles, was the first to experience the profound Gift of the Holy Spirit.

Let’s examine Matthew Poole’s perspective on this matter.

Poole was a theological writer from England, an English Presbyterian minister, and a nonconformist biblical commentator. He was born in York in 1624 and studied at Emmanuel College, Cambridge. After entering the ministry, Poole served as a minister at St. Michael-le-Querne in London. In 1662, Poole’s ministry came to an end due to the Act of Uniformity, which forced him out of the ministry. Even though his ministry was stopped, Poole continued to write and gain recognition for his work on the Bible. Two of his notable works were “Synopsis criticorum biblicorum” and “Annotations upon the Holy Bible”. These two works are known for their pastoral application and for drawing heavily on the writings of past interpreters. As such, Poole is often noted as one of the most important English biblical commentators of the 17th century.27 Matthew Poole, in his Annotations upon the Holy Bible (London, 1685), introduces Acts 2:1–13 with the heading,

“The descent of the Holy Ghost upon the apostles on the day of Pentecost”

Although this statement suggests that Poole believed the twelve apostles were the only ones to receive the Gift of the Holy Spirit first, the rest of his commentary does not support that view.28 He sees that the Holy Spirit is available to everyone.

The Catholic biblical scholar C. M. Du Veil holds that more than the apostles received the Holy Spirit when He was first poured out.

Charles Marie de Veil (also referred to as C.M. Du Veil) was a biblical scholar who wrote commentaries on the New Testament and was converted from Judaism. He studied theology in France and was well-educated before entering the Roman Catholic Church and becoming an ordained minister. De Veil earned the degree of Doctor of Divinity and served within the Roman Communion. He later became disillusioned with the Roman Communion and moved to England; there, he affiliated himself with Protestant scholars. The work for which Charles Marie de Veil is best known today is his Literal Exposition of the Acts of the Holy Apostles (1685), which illustrates his literal or philological approach to interpreting scripture. He is a significant figure for his unusual path to conversion and for his contributions to New Testament scholarship during the 17th century.29 Regarding who initially received the Gift of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, he comments on the clause “they were all” in Acts 2:1 as follows:

“That is, those hundred and twenty, of which that most noble and most holy Colledge of Disciples of Christ at that time consisted; as is said before, c. 1. v. 15.”30

He then continues on to Acts 2:3, stating that the fiery tongues

“Visibly rested upon every one of the hundred and twenty.”31

And on Acts 2:4, he makes the point even clearer:

“The Women also who were then present in the same place.”32

Here, by including women, he shows that the Spirit’s Pentecost outpouring was not limited to only the Twelve. Du Veil’s perspective is more than just “broader than the apostles” by implication. He explicitly states that the recipients in Acts 2:1–4 were the 120 disciples, including the women who were filled with the Holy Spirit. Therefore, Du Veil serves as a clear historical witness against the Apostles-Only view, but does not clarify if more than 120 received the Spirit that Day.

For the first 1700 years, there were no theologians who supported the Apostles-Only interpretation. I look forward to exploring this intriguing topic further in Part Two—stay tuned!


  1. “St. Cyril of Jerusalem,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified February 27, 2026, accessed March 20, 2026; J. P. Kirsch, “St. Cyril of Jerusalem,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908); and “Cyril (bishop of Jerusalem),” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed. ↩︎
  2. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lecture 16, sec. 4, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd ser., vol. 7, ed. Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1894). ↩︎
  3. Thomas Coke, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (London, 1801–1803), summary on Acts 2 ↩︎
  4. Ibid. ↩︎
  5. Donald Attwater, “St. John Chrysostom,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified July 26, 2025, accessed March 15, 2026. ↩︎
  6. John Chrysostom, The Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the Acts of the Apostles, trans. J. Walker, J. Sheppard, and H. Browne, Digitized April 11, 2008., vol. 1 (United Kingdom: J. H. Parker, 1851), 54. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles, hom. 4, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st ser., vol. 11, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1889), on Acts 2:1–4. ↩︎
  7. “St. Augustine,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified March 3, 2026, accessed March 15, 2026; Joseph Tixeront, “St. Augustine of Hippo,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 2 (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907). ↩︎
  8. Saint Augustine, Sermons 94A–147A on the New Testament, ed. John E. Rotelle, trans. Edmund Hill, vol. 4, The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Brooklyn, NY: New City Press, 1992), 57. ↩︎
  9. Augustine, Homilies on the First Epistle of John, hom. 2, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st ser., vol. 7, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1888). ↩︎
  10. Augustine, Exposition on Psalm 133, sec. 2, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st ser., vol. 8, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1888). ↩︎
  11. “Saint Bede the Venerable,” Encyclopedia Britannica, accessed March 20, 2026; G. Roger Hudleston, “The Venerable Bede,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907); and “Saint Bede summary,” Encyclopedia Britannica. ↩︎
  12. “Acts 2 — Bible Commentaries,” SermonIndex, s.v. “Bede,” accessed April 9, 2026; Bede, A Book of Reflection on the Acts of the Apostles 2:1–18, trans. and discussed in Charles A. Sullivan, “Bede’s Book of Reflection on the Acts of the Apostles 2:1–18. . ↩︎
  13. “Martin Luther,” Encyclopedia Britannica, last modified February 14, 2026, accessed March 15, 2026; Hartmann Grisar, “Martin Luther,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910). ↩︎
  14. Martin Luther, “Sermon for Pentecost Sunday; John 14:23–31,” in The Church Postil, 1523, trans. John Nicholas Lenker, as reproduced in “Martin Luther’s Sermon for Pentecost Sunday,” accessed March 14, 2026. ↩︎
  15. Ibid. ↩︎
  16. “John Calvin,” Encyclopedia Britannica, accessed March 15, 2026; J. P. Kirsch, “John Calvin,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908); see also Institutes of the Christian Religion, summarized in Encyclopedia Britannica. ↩︎
  17. Francis Nigel Lee, “Calvinism on the Holy Spirit: John Calvin on the Constant Need to Keep on Being Filled with the Spirit” (Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Presbyterian Theological College, n.d.), accessed August 20, 2024, https://www.scribd.com/document/109894544/coths, 23. ↩︎
  18. John Calvin, Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles, on Acts 1:14. ↩︎
  19. Ibid. ↩︎
  20. Ibid. ↩︎
  21. “Theodore Beza,” Encyclopedia Britannica, accessed March 15, 2026; “Beza, Theodore,” in Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed. ↩︎
  22. Michael Ferrebee Sadler, The Acts of the Apostles: With Notes Critical and Practical (London: George Bell and Sons, 1904), 39. ↩︎
  23. Gill, John. An Exposition of the New Testament. London, 1746–1748. ↩︎
  24. “John Lightfoot,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; “John Lightfoot (1602–1675),” Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and “John Lightfoot,” Christian Classics Ethereal Library, accessed March 15, 2026. ↩︎
  25. John Lightfoot, A Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles, Chronicall and Criticall (London, 1645), chap. 2, sec. 3. ↩︎
  26. Ibid. ↩︎
  27. “Matthew Poole,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.; Leslie Stephen, “Poole, Matthew,” in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885–1900; and “Matthew Poole,” Theopedia, accessed March 15, 2026. ↩︎
  28. Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (London, 1685), on Acts 2:1–4. ↩︎
  29. John McClintock and James Strong, “Duveil, Charles Maria,” in Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature; “Veil, De,” in Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature; and Charles Marie Du Veil, A Literal Explanation of the Acts of the Holy Apostles (London: Printed for Francis Pearse at the Blew, 1685). ↩︎
  30. C. M. Du Veil, A Literal Explanation of the Acts of the Holy Apostles (London, 1685), on Acts 2:1–4; Charles-Marie Du Veil, A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, trans. F. A. Cox, A Translation from the 1685 Latin Version. (London: J. Haddon, 1851), 33. ↩︎
  31. Ibid. ↩︎
  32. Ibid. ↩︎